What everyone is too polite to say about Steve Jobs
 

I'll be the first:
I'm not sorry about ur pancreas.

http://gawker.com/5847344/what-every...out-steve-jobs

I'll pile on.

Witness the difference in the culture of the iPhone application store and the Android marketplace. Jobs had a lot going for him. But I think his desire for centralized control has stifled some creativity. I do not like the idea that all of it had to be vetted by one entity, Apple as opposed to the hectic fecundity of the Android marketplace.

I had one of the original iMacs. The thing crashed all the time. I had an unbent paper clip always sitting next to it to push into the tiny "restart" hole on the side. Plus it had a round mouse, so you had to visually confirm the orientation before you could use it.

I have a 5th generation iPod. The face is so soft, it was all scratched up after about a month of riding by itself in my pocket with the ear buds.

But I had an earlier Mac (Performa 578) that was pretty good at the time, and a nice laser printer.

I doubt I'll ever buy another Apple product.

Oooh. That seems a bit strong.

It's true that current stories are mostly just talking about the positive side of Steve. Those of us in the industry are well aware of the stories of Jobs' temper and the Steve Jobs distortion field. No one person is all good or all bad. When his life it tallied up, I'd say he was a good thing for the industry and for our generation.

But no, not perfect.

I think the man was a genius and will be much missed.

I also think he had a fucking big pole up his arse when it came to central control (as has been mentioned).

I think one of the biggest laughs I had last year (think was last year) was when Steve Jobs wrote an open letter (I think in response to an open letter from Adobe) citing as one of his reasons for not allowing Adobe Flash on the i-phone/pad/pod that adobe is too proprietary.

Itunes and apple products are awesome, if you don't mind your usage being predetermined. I love my iphone. My mum loves her i-pad. It's perfect for her. What she needs, and what Apple have provided, is 'appliance computing'. No bugs, no glitches, no conflicts no grinding. Perfect.

Not much use if you want to watch certain formats, perform certain tasks, share the media you've fucking well bought (seriously, DRM? Get fucked.) then you need a proper computer or non-apple tablet.

I'm a very recent convert to the joys of ipod and iphones. I held off for a long time in protest against the proprietary and nailed down nature of apple products. I detested the way new OS would come out for the mac, but without backwards compatibility. I detested the way some formats just wouldn't work. And, frankly, to be able to run the kinds of games I used to run, and play the way I played, I needed a pc. I have been a PC gal since the 90s and have no intention of changing: my main comp and my laptop are both windows machines.

Jobs was a visionary. And we should rihtly celebrate his contribution. But he certainly wasn't a saint.

Bill Gates is and always has been one of my heroes. He did for personal computers, what Steve Jobs did for consumable media platforms. Taken together they've fundamentally altered the world we live in.

Cheap shot, too soon.

I, too, had read (in many places) that the man could be an asshat at times. But, I didn't wanna go there by myself.

Also, I reckon the guy parked anywhere he damn-well pleased.

Isn't it ironic that his cause of death is abbreviated as "PC"?


Replied for you.

Ooooo

I am the king of "polite".....

Despite what people have been saying for years about Microsloth, Apple really is the Borg.

I've been saying that (or something at least similar) ever since they hunted down and killed Franklin, back when Bill Gates was saying "hardware, shmardware. Can I show you something in a nice operating system?"

Apple's DRM shit is enough for me to boycott them.

The GPS tracking is damn sinister.

.

He was not a genius. In fact, I suspect he was rather nasty. As was Walter Cronkite and Peter Jennings. What Jobs did was empower the geniuses. He was all about the product; screw the finance. He made the company so profitable by ignoring profits. The product was more important. He knew what a genius could do - and encouraged such people.

Management never makes these decisions. Management only defines a strategic objective. Decisions are made and succeed when management permits them to happen. Jobs did that.

I like how you just state that as a bald fact :p

Neither you nor I are qualified to make such a statement.