In France they are civil unioning
 

Yeah I knew this would happen.

Religious right: "Gays can't get married!"
Gays: "But we want partnership rights!"
Politicians: "Let's just have civil unions which grant rights without marriage."
Heteros: "Holy shit, those civil union things look like a great option! None of the church bullshit? We love it!"
Religious right: "We didn't think of that...!"

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/16/wo...html?src=twrhp

Almost comic opera !

The law of unintended consequences must be gaulling to the churches.

Well...Frankly I am appalled at your punning.

That article failed to answer the most important question.
And the property????:eyebrow:

Dissolved with acid.

At present, homo and hetero couples are challenging the law by turning up to register their unions - marriage for same-sex couples and civil partnerships otherwise. It's all about drawing attentikon to the silliness of a law that allows gender to be an issue when the same is strictly prohibited in employment law (and many others).

U used to believe that things were reasonable in this country, but the more I've read, the more I realise that "separate but equal" is utterly wrong in law. And I don't believe any civilised country should be in thrall to anyone's magic book. Unless they're prepared to adopt the whole thing and outlaw cheeseburgers, prawn rings, and statues.

Most of the French gays and lesbians I've met want one thing : to be considered as normal citizens ie : no discrimination in employment, careers, renting/buying home.

And while you can help with laws, the first thing to change is the mind of Monsieur Durand (you would say Joe Average).

I'm hetero, 42 and a confirmed bachelor. Yet, during the interview with my current employer, they asked me about the fact that I'm a bachelor. I take it the subtitle was : Aren't you gay ?

Another point : At first, Gay/Lesbian associations were built to help fighting AIDS. Now, they have nearly achieved the status of a political party. They are certainly lobbying a lot for rights.

As a French comic put it years ago : All men are equal... and some are more equal than others.

George Orwell wrote the same in Animal Farm :)

It's so funny when a cultural difference catches me completely off-guard like this. I did the eyeball-equivalent of a double-take.

In the US, no interviewing employer would dare ask about anything of the sort, even in passing conversation outside of the real interview questions. They'd be sued faster than they could blink, because the subtext would be that the offer of employment depended on the answer.

But Clod, unless I have missed it completely, US employers are completely free
to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation.

That is, sexual orientation is not a protected class such as
race, color, national origin, religion, sex, family status, or disability.
Have I completely missed this ?

I did some Googling and found this link.

It's a list of federal laws regarding discrimination in employment.
The second section is a listing of Discriminatory Practices
This link has only a rather oblique mention of sexual orientation:
"Conduct" sounds as though it applies only to current employees, not necessarily to prospective employees.

I'm interested in this because my assumption now is that with DADT repealed for the US military,
prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation will follow into the civilian population,
in the same way the military effectively lead the way on ending discrimination based on race.

They can also say, " Tell me about yourself".

"What is the worst thing you ever...etc etc" Employers give people many chances to shoot oneself in the foot" Discrimination at an interview would be very hard to prove. I think so anyway. The interviewers would have to be pretty blatant.

Oh absolutely, I'm not saying the discrimination doesn't happen. I'm just saying they have to be very careful to hide it. Even here in Texas, where the law says they can fire you for any reason or no reason at all, companies have a ton of (internal) rules for HR folks about what they can and can't say, not only to current and prospective employees, but to prospective new employers of ex-employees, who may call for general references and background checks. Like most corporate behavior, it's all about covering their ass so they don't get involved in a civil suit.

If every state in the Union would recognize and give the same rights to gays with a civil union the whole issue would dissolve or at least die down to a dull roar in this country.

IF...

If civil unions were the norm for everyone I think the churches would be happier in the long run.

Then, a "marriage" would not be a function of the state,
and the content of the ceremony would be in keeping with the faith of the individual and their religion.

France may be leading the way (again ?)