The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   al-Jazeera in Vermont (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=17558)

xoxoxoBruce 06-22-2008 08:14 PM

al-Jazeera in Vermont
 
Neatorama points to an NPR story about a battle in Vermont over al-Jazeera’s English-language 24-hr news channel.
Quote:

There’s been an interesting news story out of Burlington, Vermont - a great town if you ever have a chance to visit. The city of Burlington owns the city’s cable television service and their cable system is one of only two, apparently, in the United States that carries al-Jazeera’s English-language 24-hr news channel.

A small group of people have come together to demand that Burlington drop al-Jazeera from its cable service, claiming that al-Jazeera is anti-American and anti-Israeli and is engaged in “cultural Jihad” against the United States. Yes - people like this really do exist. Advocates for keeping al-Jazeera remind detractors that they can simply “turn the channel,” and insist that as freedom-lovers they cherish al-Jazeera’s presence on their local cable system as an exercise in diversity of viewpoints.

There have been a number of public hearings and discussions, and it appears that a final decision from the city government as to what will happen is being put on hold.
I agree that al-Jazeera is probably more than bias toward the bad guys, but there are two points;
1- I'd like to know what the bad guys are being told.
2- More importantly, it's censorship and that's bad, plain and simple.

Griff 06-22-2008 08:34 PM

Right on target.

regular.joe 06-22-2008 08:45 PM

Keep em. You're never completely useless....you can always be used as a bad example.

The English Al-Jeseera and the Arabic Al-Jeseera, aren't even close on content.

Griff 06-23-2008 05:16 AM

If we're in a war of ideas, it'd be nice to know what we're fighting.

SteveDallas 06-23-2008 09:14 AM

Yeah, what they said. A) At risk of being branded a first amendment absolutist, I have a hard time buying that there's any justification for blocking a news broadcast just because some people (or even most people) think it's biased. B) Know thine enemy.

xoxoxoBruce 06-23-2008 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveDallas (Post 464369)
At risk of being branded a first amendment absolutist, I have a hard time buying that there's any justification for blocking a news broadcast just because some people (or even most people) think it's biased.

Yeah, otherwise they'd have to kill FOX News.:haha:

regular.joe 06-23-2008 01:53 PM

What really burns my nads about any news channel or agency is that they have the balls to look me in the proverbial eye and tell me "were not biased, we just tell the truth".

Griff 06-23-2008 02:43 PM

It is possible that they tell the truth about what they cover, but choosing what to cover is where the bias is. They are all biased towards sensationalistic nonsense, which plays right into the hands of politicians who need face time.

spudcon 06-23-2008 02:52 PM

Yeah, lest's dig up Tokyo Rose, and put her on CNN!

DanaC 06-23-2008 03:33 PM

Quote:

It is possible that they tell the truth about what they cover, but choosing what to cover is where the bias is.
That is a very good point, Griff.

I don't really see where the problem lies, myself. The English language Al Jazeera that I have watched is not pushing an islamic agenda, nor is it overtly anti- American, the West, or Israel. What it does do is display a more sympathetic attitude towards, for example, Palestine in its reporting, and is rather more critical about Israel's actions, than most of the English news channels. That said, I don't think it hurts much to have that other perspective out there. Bear in mind, there is a world of difference between being critical of a country's actions or policies, and being anti- that country.

Given that the mainstay of their audience will be the English-speaking and therefore most assimilated portion of the immigrant arab population, it wouldn't be a very popular move to just slam America all the time. Like any news channel, their aim is not to keep their audience as small as humanly possible, therefore limiting themselves purely to the most stridently anti-American parts of the population would be a very poor business model. So far Al Jazeera has shown themselves more than capable of finding a respectable niche within the broadcasting spectrum.

glatt 06-23-2008 03:40 PM

I don't subscribe to any cable service, but if I did, I would be interested in having as many channels as possible that cater to my own interests. I don't picture myself watching al-Jazeera much. But who knows? Maybe I would find it fascinating and watch it all the time.

jinx 06-23-2008 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by regular.joe (Post 464399)
What really burns my nads about any news channel or agency is that they have the balls to look me in the proverbial eye and tell me "were not biased, we just tell the truth".

Especially when they've gone to court several times to defend their right to NOT tell the truth. Fuckin jerks...

Cicero 06-23-2008 09:30 PM

Yea. Why not?

JuancoRocks 06-24-2008 01:21 AM

I have a hard time listening to any raghead "News Station"
named "Al's Jizz Rah" :headshake

DanaC 06-24-2008 03:57 AM

raghead?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.