![]() |
Smooth Running Democracies
Kenya death toll seen at 250
Pakistan decides "in principle" to delay poll Democracy is not a panacea. Democracy is just one way that a stable society can govern itself. In unstable societies it is just another way to continue instability. |
NOOOOOO!!!! It is the undemocracies that are the problem and I will not stop until every fascist, commie, monarch, and every other type of undemocrat is squashed beneath my feet.
|
Guys, the shittiest free-market Democracy in the world is
Albania Featured in P.J. O'Rourke's book "Eat The Rich" which I highly recommend. It was his description of Albania that kind of opened my eyes that free-market Democracy is not the tonic UG thinks it is. The nature of the people is the nature of the nation. O'Rourke offers free Albania and unfree Sweden and guess where we'd all prefer to live? |
Well Albanian Bikini Team doesn't ring a bell, does it?
|
Quote:
|
I believe he is saying that our national character is such that we'd be pretty stable no matter what our form of government. Democracy is fine and mostly workable for us. Others' mileage may vary.
|
We cherish the individual freedoms, autonomy, and privacy, this democracy called the USA, provides. Probably most of us take for granted, a great deal more than the criminals, illegal aliens, gang bangers and terrorists.
Why there ought to be a law.... but not one that applies to me. |
There is no need for us to change.
For centuries and centuries, through biblical times, civilization's great question is, "What set of laws shall make us successful?" If only we could stop certain behaviors and encourage others, we'd be golden! In truth, Griff has it: in cultures that have mastered Democracy, the laws are just an extension of the people, and not the other way round. |
Oh, I agree. The more lawless the people, the more laws are passed. But the lawless ignore them anyway, so they only oppress the rest.
|
Getting to the Kenya one. I don't think our set political boundaries are helping at all. Honestly, the only way Africa can get rid of the problems we gave them is to make their own boundaries. But that is only effective if we pull out from Africa, and by that I mean all influence and let them take care of their resources. Then, there will be many fights and genocides (see Europe 700-1950), and we will have relative peace afterwards.
Somehow I don't see that happening... |
Quote:
|
But you could say that about 7th-21th century Europe too.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Much of the Arab population of the world are anti-democratic because they see the treacherous deeds commited by the U.S. (self-proclaimed "leader of democracy") and they're left thinking ... "If that's what democracy is then I want nothing to do with it". I think what you wrote about "democracy and unstable societies" applies very well here. The U.S. is such an extremely unstable democracy that its' democratic principles are dubious to say the least. |
Nevertheless Dr, the US is an extremely stable nation. There are few riots, and crime is just that: crime; not the sectarian killing fields of less stable nations.
Y'know I'm rarely reluctant to have a pop at the American political zeitgeist....but 'carry on as fascists'? 'Violent, morally dubious, imperialists' I can see a case for, but fascists? And I do not believe for one second that Arab populations are anti-democratic because of America's example. If they are voicing that then they are voicing it as an excuse. An excuse to adhere to socio-political systems which really do border on the fascistic (in some cases) albeit of a religious bent. The arab nations have many genuine grievances, often against the US and the UK, but America is not to blame for their choice of political system. They may have provided a contributary factor in creating the landscape out of which those systems grow and in which the decisions are made, but that is all. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.