Man arrested for buying junior high school girl's panties
 

In the shadow of the "Driver fined for smoking in lorry" thread, we bring you ...

++++++++++++++++++++++++

Man arrested for buying junior high schoolgirl's panties

ISHIOKA, Ibaraki -- A man has earned the dubious honor of being the first person arrested for breaking an Ibaraki Prefectural Government ordinance outlawing minors from selling their underpants, police said.

Kenji Tomita, 46, a part-time worker from Ishioka, has been sent to the Ashikaga Local Public Prosecutors Office for breaking the Ibaraki Prefectural Government's ordinance aimed at providing a wholesome upbringing for youth.

Tomita admits to the allegations.

Tomita was the first person to be arrested under a clause of the ordinance that outlaws the practice of minors under 18 from removing their underwear and selling it.

Police said Tomita paid 10,000 yen in cash to a 14-year-old junior high schoolgirl he met through a mobile phone matchmaking site in exchange for her giving him two pairs of her panties at a hotel in southern Ibaraki Prefecture.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

This is from The Mainichi Daily News, a major Japanese paper. See http://mdn.mainichi.jp/national/news...na033000c.html

10,000 yen is about US $85.

Well, right or wrong? Free trade and market economics, or pedophilic exploitation?
Harmless wanker, or dangerous predator?
Good bargain, or outrageously overpriced?

Three random thoughts:

1. If jailbait panties are banned, only criminals will have jailbait panties.

2. Why isn't the girl in trouble also? (Or if she is, why doesn't the article mention it?)

3. Only in Japan.

Yeah,I'll believe almost anything of the Japanese sex-wise. Remember that series of photographs for the weird role-playing sex hotel?

They have a law against this in Japan, now?

My, how times have changed.

I guess the legendary vending machine had run out.

See http://www.photomann.com/japan/machines/ for this and more weird vending machines.

Which is better? Personal, organic, free-range panties? or impersonal, mechanized, battery-farmed panties?

And how differently do you react if we replace "panties" with "underpants" in all of these posts?

My ears are bleeding.

It would, perhaps, be even worse if you were talking about moist panties.

That's weird.
I have an old friend who had a cringe/shudder reaction to the word "moist". I thought she was weird. I still do.
Nice though.
How many other people here are freaked out by "moist"?

I like moist panties. A sign of things to come ... so to speak.

I don't have a problem with the word "moist." But I have known several people who hated that word. They were all female.

I've known several females as well who couldn't stand the word "moist" as well. I've no problem with it personally.

I am so glad you posted here Razzamatazz... because ...
Did you know that razzamatazz is a brand of stockings (at least in Australia)? I only know this because of their TV ads, I swear.

I got the name from my favorite crayola crayon color...

Clearly I should have gone for "RazzleDazzleRose"...less confusion that way.
http://www.crayola.com/colorcensus/h...chronology.cfm

I love prussian blue! I think we talked about this somewhere else. I wonder if I could get UT to change my name to that. Or Aqua Blue. Hmm.

Are you referring to the color of your underpants?

God no! That's a brand of ... well, you'd probably rather not know.
Just don't.