![]() |
Evolution is quicker than they thought
Samoan butterflies quickly evolve to avoid extinction .
It appears that evolution can take place much faster than the scientists realized before now. Quote:
|
Not macro, not micro... just evolution.
|
I don't like the wording of the article. Species do not mutate in response to a situation, they have to already have a mutation and then that trait will survive while the others die. It is all about good genetic diversity.
|
Quote:
Polar bears the scientist said don't like to swim. I wondered if they will evolve and not become extinct as some scientists fear. Same goes for the penguins. Quote:
|
That's a bit of confusion from the global warming folks: polar bears do not live on ice, they use the ice as fishing platforms. As the ice melts they do not lose their home, which is on land; they lose their jumping-off places to catch more fish.
|
Of course species mutate in response to situations... that's the idea.
Ducks from S America end-up on the Falklands and other islands... they change. Happens all the time, duh. |
Well, piercehawkeye45 is correct that individuals don't mutate in response to situations- the gene has no way to know in advance what sort of mistranscribing will be useful. But the selection of beneficial mutations that "mutates" the species in general is in response to situations.
Biologist PZ Meyers has an interesting article on these moths, tying them into the comic book "Y the Last Man". |
Quote:
There may be selection pressure that causes them to give up and head back to land earlier, but if that means they don't have enough to feed their young, they aren't going to pass that tendency on. Perhaps they'll have to start picking a cub, and only raise one at a time instead of two. |
Quote:
I thought we were talking about evolution? *pulls out map*:whofart: |
Individuals mutate, species evolve, which is why I put "mutate" in quotes. For a species to evolve in response to a situation, it has to have individuals with beneficial mutations. The mutations aren't in response to the situation, but the evolution is.
|
Bullshit...I thought every thing was created and it's part of God's masterplan that's what they teach nowadays aint it thought they just opened the Creationist Museum your side of the pond which explains it all :D
http://www.creationmuseum.org/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For viruses for example, lets assume that there are four different types of virus A: AA, AB, AC, and AD. Lets say there are 1,000 virus strains and 950 are AA, 20 are AB, 20 are AC, and 10 are AD. When we add an antibody to kill the virus, we find out that the type AB is already immune to the antibody. So after we add the antibody, the number of virus strains go down from 1,000 of 4 different kinds to 20 just AB making it seem like the virus is gone but then the AB virus will grow again and in a week or so we will have 950 AB viruses, 20 AA, 20, AE, and 10 AF. We add the antibody again but since AB is immune to it, 950 virus strains will remain and it will seem that the virus has mutated in response to the antibody when in reality, the conditions changed and the virus strains that were already immune to the antibody were the only ones that survived (microevolution). Mutations are random, natural section is not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.alexalienart.com/Alien550.JPG I'm not saying it's impossible, but it certainly isn't common... |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.