The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Home Base (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   The only way to win an argument (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=13907)

Cloud 04-18-2007 09:21 AM

The only way to win an argument
 
I agree with Dale Carnegie, who says:

"The only way to win an argument is to avoid it." and--

"You may be right, dead right, as you speed along with your argument, but as far as changing another's mind is concerned, you will probably be just as futile if you were wrong."

"You can't win an argument. You can't because if you lose it, you lose it; and if you win it, you lose it. . . . you will feel fine. But what about him? You have made him feel inferior. You have hurt his pride. He will resent your triumph."


Ben Franklin said, "If you argue and rankle and contradict, you may achieve a victory sometimes; but it will be an empty victory because you will never get your opponent's good will."

Abraham Lincoln said, "No man who is resolved to make the most of himself can spare time for personal contention. . . . Better give your path to a dog than be bitten by him contesting for the right. Even killing the dog will not cure the bite."

Some people like to argue for fun. I think it is a detestable habit, and counterproductive, to say the least. Even if you know you're right, and are able to prove it--so what? Every argument you win makes you a lesser person overall. It's why I walk away when things get too contentious. Being in the middle of a snarling dog pack is not as fun as it looks on cartoons.

SadistSecret 04-18-2007 09:30 AM

I've changed people's opinions on things before, and I consider that winning. There's a difference between getting someone to just back down and not only admitting that you're right, but to also take your opinion as their own.

Spexxvet 04-18-2007 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cloud (Post 334676)
... Every argument you win makes you a lesser person overall...

No it doesn't [/argument clinic]

SadistSecret 04-18-2007 09:37 AM

Every argument I win proves that once again, I'm right about something, and every argument lost is a lesson learned.

Shawnee123 04-18-2007 09:39 AM

The ability to reason, debate, and form conclusions is what life is all about. Socrates said "A life unexamined is not worth living." Sometimes you examine more of yourself when you hear differing opinions; I know I have been urged to rethink some of my very set ideas as a result of Cellar debates.

And I've certainly seen more detestable habits, but I won't go there.

By the way, Dale Carnegie also said "Fear not those who argue but those who dodge." :cool:

SadistSecret 04-18-2007 09:41 AM

Wow, I think the opening post has been totally debunked.

Shawnee123 04-18-2007 09:42 AM

Thanks. I'll be here all week. Try the veal.

SadistSecret 04-18-2007 09:47 AM

I'll be here all month, but the caterer is late.

rkzenrage 04-18-2007 09:51 AM

Debate is not a contest... I do not live against anyone, those that do are deluded IMO, there is nothing to win. I feel sad for them.

Cloud 04-18-2007 09:57 AM

an arguer focuses solely on himself or herself, instead of listening. Perhaps that's why I've not been made to feel welcome here, despite a pretty diligent effort on my part to contribute.

It's okay! You guys can go argue with Lincoln and Ben, if you want. :)

glatt 04-18-2007 10:10 AM

Sure, everyone gets along better if there are no arguments. But...

I've modified my thinking based on arguments here in the Cellar. Being presented with new ideas and perspectives is always a good thing. It doesn't always happen, of course. Sometimes a topic gets beaten to death, and you just have to agree to disagree. I notice a lot of people are staying out of the gun debate in the VT thread. It's been done to death here and nobody is changing anybody's opinions on that one.

rkzenrage 04-18-2007 10:20 AM

Which is strange. That thread is a good example of weird behavior.
Person A: makes a statement.
Person B: refutes
Then person A just makes the same initial statement without ever taking into consideration the change in paradigm made by the second statement... it is strange and, as I said earlier, sad. It shows a lack of imagination and, in some, intellect.

And emotions are not valid when making a point as to why they choose not to address points. Guns, or anything else, are not any more "emotional" than any other discussion, they just are.

Clodfobble 04-18-2007 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cloud
Perhaps that's why I've not been made to feel welcome here, despite a pretty diligent effort on my part to contribute.

Really? Sorry to hear you feel that way. I thought you were pretty well included, and even thinking about it I can't remember anyone arguing with you on anything in particular... I think there's a difference between debating a topic and rudely arguing about it. You also have to remind yourself on occasion that for every heated argument, there are dozens of active users not participating in it. You can walk away from a thread without pulling back from the whole community. :2cents:

rkzenrage 04-18-2007 10:29 AM

I think that people think I'm an asshole, well one of the reasons, is that I just don't see that there is a place for emotion in debate and one should remove it.

glatt 04-18-2007 10:37 AM

Your style is to speak in absolutes. I think that rubs many people the wrong way.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.