![]() |
Trailers, Secrets And Los Alamos
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15566388/site/newsweek/
Quote:
|
If a simple clerk can get her hands on it so easily...
Just imagine what a well-coordinated team of spies could do? Huh, 'keeping america secure' my ass. Maybe the Dems can do better? |
Or maybe the information is worthless. Or a honeypot.
"Nuclear secrets" are fast becoming oxymoronic. Today's cutting-edge research is tomorrow's fifth-grade "get Daddy to help you with that" science project. |
Well...Lisa Simpson did it didn't she?
|
Two separate issues here. First was she working for someone or a free-lancing spy? Details such as what she said before and after she lawyered up are not provided. Therefore we don't know.
Second, why is security so lax? Well, it was routine and easy to carry secure documents out of building - even before electronic storage mediums. So much of security - exactly same as in quality - is found in attitude and knowledge of the people. Just like in quality, little is accomplished by Quality Control inspectors - not to be confused with Quality Assurance. |
As a former intelligence professional, I'd say contractor understanding of information security is still not uniformly good -- putting it mildly. We had this kind of problem with "The Falcon and the Snowman," too.
Fundamentally, security, OPSEC, and the like are accomplished by the integrity of the employees: even the security measures in place at NSA Fort George G. Meade could have been defeated by a determined effort to smuggle data out. For a time, anyway. But what's routine is something like the Vegas tagline -- what's in NSA, stays in NSA. Intelligence work is like a specialized form of journalism: you assemble the information, organize it intelligibly -- but you're very much pickier about who your customers are. You want secret keepers, you screen for personal integrity. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.