![]() |
plthijnx and I live in a tough 'hood
It's a quiet Saturday afternoon, a couple of blocks away from plt and NBN.
Four armed men burst into your home. Do you: A) Lock yourself in a closet B) Dial 911 C) Disarm one of the intruders and shoot him to death with his own weapon <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3733289.html">Story</a> |
D) Have your SKS ready and demobilize the whole lot immediately. :rattat:
|
OK, what's "Envíos Catrachos."?:right:
|
It's nice to read that in some parts of the US, you are still allowed to fight and stand your ground as opposed to fleeing your own home until the intruders have left.
|
Bravo for the victim for taking out the bad guy. Of course, I'm sure that the dead invader was probably a victim of a difficult upbringing, and society is to blame, but nevertheless...
|
uMMMM... Switch the paper licence plate real fast and get one of those el cheapo paint jobs for the car? :eek:
|
Quote:
This is why interpreting during a trial can be so dicey. Some ethnic groups use a completely different vocabulary for many common objects and have slang terms which are incomprehensible in neighboring countries. For the O.J. Simpson trial, they had to bring in an interpreter who had been born and raised in the same Central American country as the maid who was going to testify because there was no Court interpreter in Los Angeles who could understand her. The surviving morons who tried to rob and kill the man in the story will EACH be given an interpreter versed in his dialect at the expense of the taxpayers, and the defendants may hold up the trial if they are illegals from some uncommon area and do not feel that they are being provided adequate coverage. They have their civil rights, you see. These interpreters will cost the county many thousands of dollars, all to guarantee a fair trial to people who were caught in the act and are already known to be guilty. Oh well, it keeps some of us employed :neutral: |
The plea bargain is a longstand American Tradition.
Of course I'd much rather brand these assholes "Illegal: shoot on sight on U.S. Territory" across their faces and dump them back into their home country. I dug this statement, which closes out the article: A gun is a universal language. Like love. |
Quote:
|
D) Shoot him with *your* gun, *then* take his.
Carefully. Criminals frequently have crappy or poorly maintained weapons they know little about operating. When a news photog was taking pictures of Gwennie and me for a forthcoming "Philadelphia Weekly" article, we got into a conversation about the drug dealers down in Philly who frequently shoot bystanders while trying to eliminate of competition. For example, in the recent trial for the murder of Faheem Thomas-Childs, the evidence showed five shots fired by the Broaster gang, and Johnson and Spady (who were convicted of murdering the boy) fired *42*...and *nobody* hit who they were shooting at. Quote:
|
Quote:
There are some states that you not only have to leave when an intruder breaks in, but you must also have low cal sandwhich fixings ready with a six pack of cola beverage, as well as having the TV remote included with that package. There is no law at this time that the TV remote must have multilinguial instructions available, which is truly a violation of civil rights. |
Hell, drag em inside after they fall. Why quibble over a few feet?
The only side of the story the cops should hear is YOURS! Dead men tell no tales. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The important factor, of course, is that in states without a castle doctrine, you have to shoot your intruder front to back. They are actually allowed to fall OUT your door, but must do so because they have been blown through it from the impact of the rounds, just like in the movies.
(This statement is not to be construed as legal advice of any kind, especially in New Jersey, New York, California, and Maryland) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.