Gonna have to come down to a poll
 

Which do you prefer... the old timestamps on listings of posts and threads, where you'd mostly seen the time they were posted; or the new method, where you see the "1 hour ago" or such telling you how long it's been since the last post?

Is it possible to have both? In either case, if you want to know the other, you have to do yucky time arithmetic.

Nope, they only give us the options "Normal" , "Yesterday/Today", and "Detailed". We used to be on "Yesterday/Today", which would give you those if it was yesterday or today. Now we're on "Detailed".

Damifino, But I liked the old way better.

ok, the guilt is killing me. i voted twice for the old way. BigMcLargehuge feels the same way i do. sorry. wont happen again

I like the new how long ago.

The space that it's in is so spacious that I can't help but vote for option 5: take a quick peek at the PHP and hack the two together, one after another.

how long ago is better

Detailed.:notworthy

I think I tied it up between the old way and not giving a rat's ass with my vote at 22.22%.

I like it the way I found it. I don't know anything else.

It's user friendly, organized and clean.

I don't think clean is the right word but hey I just got up.


:morncoff:

Detailed is nice. If I look at a post and it says it was posted 5 days ago, then I can say: "There is no reason to look at that thread."

unless you know you havent been on for 5 days.

the new way

the new way, that way we can be sure we are getting oven fesh posts and we aren't paying full price for day old posts, which should be at least 50% off. I think a "sell by" date would be nice too.