They're all nutballs.



(Yes, the air is nice and clear up here on my high horse :thumb:)

Absolutely. My conclusion is the guy needs to just go away.
If this is the best plan his team could come up with in 10 days, it just shows how completely incompetent they are.
That is not leadership. Thats Bullship.

The money issue hasn't even started yet. Has anyone else read about the campaign finance issue?

I realized that after I posted. I'm sure it came out because of a fellow Republican's digging, but now the money is starting to flow into his campaign just as he should be shutting down, because the faithful assume its a left wing smear, of course the usual right v left propagandizing is still occurring it is just after the information has come out. Look at merc's reaction assuming innocence while the left assumes guilt and the sides switch when they get going on Clinton. Politicians are generally awful people so I assume a lot of this stuff is true, but I'd like to see ideas be the main source of discussion, since workable ideas are, so far, missing from this election cycle.

Well said Griff - I hadn't thought of that as a reason.
Gah - - - totally messed up.

Bottom line, Liberals are willing to jump on the band wagon of demonizing Cain over accusations where as they have no defense over a sitting President shooting his DNA on a young professional staffer while in the White House. An accusation is just that, often the expedient thing to do is to arbitrate, and what ever the decision is after that is what happens, you pay them off, you agree to something in private, issue over. It still does not rise to the level of High Crimes and Misdemeanors, as Clinton was accuse of (due to his lies on the stand), not to mention his lies to the public, "I did not have sex with that woman". You people become more laughable every day.... :lol:

ANYONE BUT OBAMA IN 2012! :lol:

yeh, well right now it looks like it sure as heck won't be Cain. The man is so incompetent that he can't even get out of his own way.

Okay, enough of my mumblemumblemumble solutions.

Here it is:

I know neither of you want it, which is why you are perfect for it.

As usual, you don't answer my questions.

As for what happened between Clinton and Lewinsky and what happened between Cain and these three women, you fail to make a distinction between consensual sex and sexual harassment. They're as different as happy-sexy-fun time and rape. Consent is crucial. It seems clear that there was consent in Clinton's case, it seems equally clear, indeed the very definition of sexual harassment, that there was NO consent in Cain's case. If you don't understand this, or don't respect this, you need to stay the fuck away from me and my family and my friends. It's not that hard to understand, but based on your post above, you don't get it.

What I find hilarious is that your "defense" of Cain is "Clinton did it!" REALLY? That's... ok with you? That Cain's no worse than Clinton? You've made your opinion of Clinton pretty clear over the years, and if this isn't damning with faint praise, I don't know what is. Hilarious.

You don't get what sexual harassment means and you excuse it because other people did something. If attitudes like your continue to represent Obama's opposition, this is gonna be easier and more embarrassing than I previously expected.

^^WHS^^

Tomorrow (Friday, the 4th) is the next big day for Herman Cain's campaign.

Supposedly, the attorneys will decide what, if anything, will be allowed for the confidentiality agreements with the Natl Restaurant Assoc and the two women accusers.

Also, Friday night is the announced campaign debut of Gloria Cain.
We hope she is not at home ironing a leopard-print dress.

Hey, at least it would be ironed.

This is mind-bending...

Politico
JONATHAN MARTIN
11/4/11
Herman Cain accuser attorney: Settlement dated 9/99, Kilgore signed

...and???

I guess when I need to explain it, it's not so weird... think 999