New smilies available
 

In my effort to occasionally do something solely for the Cellar, to show that I truly do things other than post on it, I have added a handful of new graphical smilies.

I discourage overuse.

:boxers:

:censored:

:typing:

:doit:

:drunk:

:flipbird:

:joint:

:king:

:lovers:

:joylove:

:worried:

Also, except for the sex one, all smilies here are from the same "universe" and not infected with different styled smilies from Yahoo and elsewhere.

They do represent a racially integrated smilie community.

:king: Hail to the King, baby!

AND PAY FOR IT. :beer:

In light of current events, I think we all need to insist that the gender(s) involved in this one :lovers: and this one :doit: be clarified so we will be able to know exactly what kind of perversion(s) we're dealing with. http://www.barks.org/misc/rotflmao.gif

wolf pointed it out elsewhere but I forgot to mention that I also added

:band:

I think the person that did this drew the guitar but actually used a scanned copy of an actual bass.

:flipbird: Tee hee!
:joint: oh hell yeah!

Very weird, I just looked through those for another post. But I think the :band: should be broken into four images, so (l)users can pick just one instrument. C'mon Undertony, get to it, that's what we're paying you for!

Oh wait, I'm a leech. Nevermind.

WHAT!?!? Break up the band? Noooo:eek:

I was just gonna complain about the lack of a clarinet.

Re: New smilies available
 

Thank you for the smileys, Mr Toad.

Overuse would be? Two smileys in a single post? Two consecutive posts with smileys? Two characters using two smileys in two consecutive post?

What would be the general guidelines? Should I expect to recieve several wiseass PMs when I use them per my judgement (like usual)?

Is there a Supreme Court precedent or cautionary tale that can be used as reference?

They certainly are cool but I'll be holding off using them before I know what the rules are.

Just so you can break 'em, right?

You know me sooo well. :)

True. :lovers:

Re: New smilies available
 

unless you're bruce who has demonstrated a pattern of using at least one :emot: with every post.

I imagine it is a need as real as eating and breathig for him by now, and to limit their use is to limit bruce's art. I don't think he'd survive for very long.

- a concerned cellizen.