Libby is indicted, resigns
 

From CNN: Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. C'mon, just a few more! :lol:

Another domino falls. :applause:

Do you think they drew straws to see who would be the scapegoat?

It looks like he dried to fall on his sword but just nicked his ankle
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/POLITICS...rutches.ap.jpg

Is it a crime for Cheney to instruct or otherwise encourage Libby to leak the info about Wilson's wife? Anybody know? I personally think that Rove, Libbey and Cheney are all guilty in this one. I doubt the President was in the loop. And how is Rove weaseling his way out of this one? I'm really dissapointed in these charges. I think the evidence points to much more.

Libby: Indicted, resigned
DeLay: Indicted, stepped aside
Rove: Under investigation
Cheney: Under investigation
Frist: Under investigation

Yes, it's schadenfreude, but boy am I enjoying this. :corn:

There's more to come. its just getting started.

I just have to add...Fitzgerald rocks.

THE SCOOTER SCOOTS

In the blue collar world, being charged with a felony isn't as easy as quitting your job.
Steal change from the Zippy Mart where you work: GO TO JAIL!
Fuck the whole goddam country's confidentiality up: RESIGN!
And I'll bet my ass Dick is straight up with all this. If he isn't.... we'll never know. Cheney's prolly the only one on the hill who AIN'T NEVER DONE NUTTIN WRONG.
I better shut the fuck up. All this treason is starting to piss me off.
If we'd a died in the conflict, we wouldn't have to see what these beaurocratic /sp?/ bastards have done with the freedom we fought [and many died] for.
oh shit....should I have posted this on the Posting While Intoxicated thread?

The pres was in the loop.

Sure he was. The boy is only just barely smart enough to think up a frigging frat trick like outing a spook out of spite. They're all a bunch of elitist rich frat boys who are used to getting their way. I hope they enjoy going to prison and having Bubba get his way with them as his new bitches.

Kiddies, let this be a lesson to you. Greed is bad.

There is just a wiff of traction in the air.

Does anyone know where the phrase "The Fall guy" comes from. It's not because someone is 'falling' from their position.

The phrase comes from Albert Fall, a Republican who was involved in another turn-of-the-century scandal. .

Maybe 40 years from now, they'll be saying "The Libby guy".

Or maybe they will speak of being Libbyrated :D

The Wikipedia article does imply how the term 'Fall guy' could have been created. But it does not say so specifically. IOW is there a better source that specifically cited the origins of 'fall guy'? And is there a description of how the event eventually resulted in the expression - ie a newpaper reporter?

The term "Mission Accomplished" should be an expression defining another political method of lying - or how a nation can "Peral Harbor" another and not feel guilty. But I doubt it. What was it that made 'fall guy' so generic? Was this another creation of W Randolph Hurst?

I did a Google on the origin of the term and another explanation is that it originated in Britain around 1906:

Perhaps Albert Fall's mis-adventures helped the term become a part of American English, as well.

No, Wikipedia states that;;)

Ahh, vindicated. :thankyou:hank you.

Wikipedia is the only source that states that. The other dictionaries available online give various different origins of the term. It was first used in written language in 1906 - well before the Tea Pot Dome scandal. Google it for yourself if you don't believe me. :p

Well, I found the 1906 source in an etymology site. I also found a few other sources which mention the Albert Fall theory.

I will have to do some more research.:3_eyes:

Such as how many foles it takes to fill him?

/obscure

Libby - guilty

But he's not "saddened" for Wilson and Plame and their family. Go figure.

From here.
Why not prosecute anyone else? Someone had to have leaked the info. The Democats need a pit bull like Ken Starr to get on the case.

A funny aside: On NPR yesterday, reporter Libby Lewis reported the Lewis Libby story.

http://www.meaus.com/101-lewis-libby.JPEG
Lewis Libby
http://www.npr.org/about/people/bios...tos/llewis.jpg
Libby Lewis

Because Libby's perjury blocked the investigation.

When the verdict was announced, Libby should have said "Pardon me?"

Notice how many - clearly a majority even in the Cellar - still support the mental midget. The quantitative measurement? How often does anyone ask the obvious and embarrassing question: "When are we going after bin Laden?"

Meanwhile, it’s only a matter of time before George Jr pardons Libby. What is more important? A neocon agenda. An agenda well supported by all conservatives because conservatives also don't ask the embarrassing question. Just another reason why a Libby pardon will occur without any consequences.

I don't think you have your finger on the pulse of the Cellar. Put up a poll and see.

..on the last day Bush is in office.

...and the appeals can easily last until then.

So how many posters disparage the president? How many actually demand the only solutions available? Anyone can tacitly criticize as the majority did during Nixon. And yet we stayed in Nam massacring good Americans for longer than America's WWII. How could we kill off so many good Americans if so many civilians "opposed" the Vietnam quagmire? For all the talk, an overwhelming majority only dislike and therefore still support "Mission Accomplished".

Given oppurtunity to oppose the war, Americans voted for the liar Nixon in a landslide. Even after he said he had a secret plan to end the war - and he did not - still America voted for Nixon in a landslide four years after the 'secret plan' lie. Why? The majority clearly disliked Nam. But when it came to action, the majority massively promoted four more years - in Nam. And that was when demonstrations against Nam put one million in Washington. We don't have any demonstrations against "Mission Accomplished" for one good reason. The overwhelming majority only dislike and therefore still support "Mission Accomplished".

I don't see anyone even asking an embarrassing question about bin Laden - which means tacit support for "Mission Accomplished" - as the majority did to support Nixon's fiasco. Yes, a majority are in 'dislike' of George Jr. But my benchmarks clearly define passive support for "Mission Accomplished". Even the term "Mission Accomplished" - such a trivial expression - would be routine if the majority here opposed this war.

Passive criticism is how a majority of Americans supported a massacre of the last 30,000 American soldiers. They even criticized whistle blowers on My Lai rather than blame the coverup at highest levels. A clear majority here do not even demand actions defined by the Iraq Study Group - our only viable solution. We even suspended writ of Habeas Corpus and a clear majority in the Cellar do not care - more support for the lying president. We openly kidnapped and tortured in 'secret prisions' with near zero outcry. No matter what one says; without blunt demands for actions, then one does not call it "Mission Accomplished".

Text and tone of a majority here is not opposition to "Mission Accomplished". It is only 'dislike' of that war. 'Dislike' is how one supports war - as the majority supported what was obviously to be a defeat in Nam.

Whom do I ask about Bin Laden? No one on this board can answer that, so why waste my time asking here? :question: