The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   ADVIL! Nooooooooooooo!!!!! (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=4592)

Lady Sidhe 12-14-2003 05:43 PM

ADVIL! Nooooooooooooo!!!!!
 
SEARCH AND SEIZURE: A student told a teacher at Parkview High School in Bossier City, La., that sophomore Amanda Stiles was smoking in the bathroom. The teacher confronted Stiles and searched her purse, but found no cigarettes or lighters. She did, however, find something else: Advil, an over-the-counter medication used to relieve headaches and menstrual cramps. "Pills!" screamed the school administrators. Possessing drugs on campus is a "zero tolerance" infraction, they point out, so they expelled Stiles for a year. The expulsion was upheld by the School Board's administrative committee and Superintendent Ken
Kruithof. (Shreveport Times) ...Thus perpetuating their smug satisfaction that they're "doing something" about the "drug problem."

ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE: Even though Houston, Texas, school Superintendent Rod Paige ordered all schools in his district to expel violent students four years ago, teachers complain students who assault and harass them are still in class. Houston Federation of Teachers union President
Gayle Fallon says principals aren't expelling violent kids since that decreases funding. A district spokesman denies that claim, saying schools get $15 per day per student, and "no principal in their right mind is going to keep a dangerous kid in their school for $15."
(Houston Chronicle) ...Right: not when they can have much more fun getting rid of kids armed with Advil.

Teachers and students are being assaulted by kids with guns and knives, and they're worried about ADVIL....

Sidhe

ladysycamore 12-15-2003 09:18 PM

Sheesh...
 
Wow, that sucks. I remember in HS, the school nurse would practically advocate girls having aspirin, Tylenol and/or Midol on hand, just in case during that time of month our insides suddenly decided to turn into knots.

Man oh man, if I had to take the amount of meds then that I do now...ha, talk about expulsion! :(

Scopulus Argentarius 12-16-2003 06:54 AM

I hate zero tolerance programs and how they are used!

(I hate them even more when they're 3.5 hours away by car. - in Bossier)

Zero tolerance programs attempt to replace common sense but are malignant substitutes for thinking and have caused too many innocent people grief.

wolf 12-16-2003 12:57 PM

There is a lot of zero tolerance absurdity going around, but the one that I still don't get ...

On a school bus a child was having an asthma attack.

She did not have her asthma inhaler.

Her TWIN SISTER was on the same medication.

And provided the inhaler to her sister who was in obvious distress and need, and in a life threatening situation.

Both sisters were expelled under the "logic" of zero tolerance.

I don't know if the case went to court and if the girls were reinstated, but this is ridiculous.

Happy Monkey 12-16-2003 01:17 PM

I have zero tolerance for zero tolerance policies. This policy itself is the exception to itself which prevents me from being hypocritical.

tikat 12-16-2003 01:31 PM

:gray: . o O (Zero tolerance policies make perfect sense. We're just getting your kids used to life in a police state.

By the time they get out, they'll be used to not having any rights and they won't object when our agents in your pitiful human government gradually whittle them away.

Mwuahahahaaaa!)

Lady Sidhe 12-16-2003 02:40 PM

If you guys are interested in these kinds of absurdities, you can go to www.thisistrue.com, or www.stellaawards.com, which lists stupid lawsuits, stupid happenings. If you're more of my bent, you might like www.darwinawards.com.

Sidhe

Elspode 12-18-2003 12:04 AM

Zero Tolerance prevents anyone from having to actually think, or (gods forbid) *teach* anyone to think.

"No, it is all right here on paper, thanks. We don't need to consider anything. Common sense? No, no, I don't see anything written here in our policy about that. All of this reading is giving me a headache. Anyone got an aspirin? Ha, ha, ha! Just kidding! Damn, I kill me".

russotto 12-18-2003 02:55 PM

When I was in middle school I had a brush with a similar policy myself. Some teacher saw me take a Chlor-Trimeton at the water fountain.
Fortunately I had only one pill with me and I'd already taken the evidence. And I'd already had lots of experience with the justice doled out by school administrators. So once I found out what was up I simply lied my ass off and claimed I hadn't taken anything at all. And was more careful about taking the pill in the future.

P.S. a 700 pill bottle of generic ibuprofen is less than $10 at Target. I wouldn't advocate taking such a bottle and emptying it out along the hallways of the school in question, but I'd sure laugh hilariously at the results.

time4me 01-03-2004 11:33 PM

For being in the "education" business, our "educators" or rather the administration, are a bunch of idiots following the policies of a bunch of other idiots. We would do well to start trying to abolish these stupid policies and start using our brains again.

richlevy 01-04-2004 02:30 PM

This reminds me a little bit of the Star of David 'gang symbol' incident. The usual stages of this process are:

1) School board comes up with asinine overreaching policy and expells or suspends some unlucky student.

2) Student and parents protest to the school district, which closes ranks with school and upholds the schools action.

3) Parents hire private trial lawyer and/or ACLU or other advocacy group.

4) Parent threaten to sue or actually sue school for amount in the tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.

5) If case is interesting enough, national media picks up story and school district is held up to public ridicule.

6) School district hires lawyer or finally talks to their lawyer, who tells them their case is unwinnable.

7) School districts insurance carrier tells them to settle or else.

8) School district announces settlement, blames miscommunication, sunspots, aliens, on 'regrettable misunderstanding', and puts enough spin on apology to cause the earth to wobble slightly in its orbit.



I checked one of the links on the Advil story at http://www.2theadvocate.com/stories/...lsion001.shtml

The most interesting part of the article is this:
Quote:

Superintendent Ken Kruithof said after the board meeting that the school system is following a state law that requires a one-year expulsion and is being consistent with the system's "zero-tolerance" policy.

But another school official said earlier Thursday that having medication on campus does not automatically lead to a one-year expulsion.

"After an investigation and a hearing then, if necessary, punishment is administered. It could be no punishment," said Betty McCauley, Bossier schools student services director.

Disciplinary action can range from in-school suspension to placement at the system's alternative school or expulsion from the system.
So one official does not believe they have any discretion and another believes there are a wide range of remedies. This is the equivalent to someone telling a defendent "Well, we're not really sure, but its either mandatory life or 3 months".

Don't these idiots even know their own rules?

This is why trial lawyers, for all of their villification by the press and politicians, are actually a neccesary component in our system. It seems obvious that the school officials, having made a decision, will not back down. No public officials have an incentive to step in. Only a person or group who wants to make a point, like the ACLU, or someone who can make a profit would be willing to step in.

I am sure that the girl's parents are already sifting through offers at this time.

xoxoxoBruce 01-04-2004 08:59 PM

The superintendent is probably saying max penalty to all to prevent being accused of being bias.

time4me 01-05-2004 04:01 PM

Hey richlevy, you sure do understand education and politics. I was actually in that boat ready to go to due process, our school district finally suggested mediation when we announced we had hired a lawyer. Our problem was that our twice gifted child was not getting an education because they couldn't understand how to teach him. But he was on grade level all the time because he is so bright. The problem was that he couldn't even get through a day of school and never even finished a school year until we placed him in a private school 1 hour away that he seems to be the "poster child" of. This is a long story but suffice to say, they could not look at my child as an individual but had to put him in a box. The box just couldn't stay wrapped. It is amazing the change in my child in just a year when he got what he needed and not what the kid down the street needed. We are dealing with people in the education business not a machine that needs a new screw or wire. Until our educators and politicians can see this, a lawyer will always be needed. I can tell you this, I would still go to due process to this day if I didn't get the settlement I needed to educate my child. In the end, they did what was right in our situation but have a long way to go to serve all of our children, especially our gifted kids who really do need a lot of guidance and a different approach to education than our traditional fare. Off my soapbox for now.

OnyxCougar 01-13-2004 10:30 AM

When do you mean "gifted" do you mean smart like Einstein or as in takes the short bus? And what does twice gifted mean?

My kids are a mixed lot. The oldest simply doesn't give a shit and could care less if he graduates or not, so he gets D's and F's and there is little I can do. I can make him do his homework, but I can't make him turn it in once he gets to school. I can put him on "restriction" for the bad grades, but he doesn't care if he sits in his room for days on end. All he does is go to sleep. Yeah. 2 more years....just 2 more...

The middle one is my "special" son, he's been in Special Ed and on IEP's since Kindergarten. He's smart, about 2 grade levels above his age group, but because he's autistic, a large classroom setting (= lots of kids) plus a more chaotic enviroment (=less structure and schedule adherance than a "special class") = a very uncontrollable (and potentially hysterical) 10 year old male.

My youngest is the einstein of the group. Smart as a whip, kind, friendly, beautiful, and the all around "perfect" child. She's the one that scares me.

Undertoad 01-13-2004 11:04 AM

Sorry to be nosy, but what's the long term expectation for your middle one? What did people think of kids like that before they knew what autism is?

plthijinx 01-18-2004 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by OnyxCougar
or as in takes the short bus?
there was a long one? :D

i don't understand why the upper administrators are getting high 5 figure and in some cases 6 figure salaries and the working force teachers aren't making squat. (here in houston, anyway). also the utopian mindset that H.I.S.D. has is sick too. at one point they were talking about re-writing history and omitting the alamo and the battle of san jacinto from texas history because "it might hurt someone's feelings" weren't they also going to do something similar in N.Y. too?

OnyxCougar 01-18-2004 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Undertoad
Sorry to be nosy, but what's the long term expectation for your middle one? What did people think of kids like that before they knew what autism is?

Well, that depends largely on Bryan. He's smart enough to do anything he wants, but he's socially delayed. I have been told to prepare myself to have him live at home, or at least closeby for the rest of his life, because he simply doesn't understand how things work together. It's like it's 5 years old in the social interactivity department and 13 in the academic department. He'll turn 11 in Feb.

I don't know what they did for autistic kids before autism was diagnosable, other than put them in asylums. I know it took me about 4 years to get him diagnosed with it to get the care he needed, tho. The doctors refused with every visit to "label" him. I handed them the DSM IIIR (and later IV) and showed them all the symptoms of mild autism, and by all rights, the child is autistic, yet they refused.

richlevy 01-18-2004 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by OnyxCougar



Well, that depends largely on Bryan. He's smart enough to do anything he wants, but he's socially delayed. I have been told to prepare myself to have him live at home, or at least closeby for the rest of his life, because he simply doesn't understand how things work together. It's like it's 5 years old in the social interactivity department and 13 in the academic department. He'll turn 11 in Feb.

I don't know what they did for autistic kids before autism was diagnosable, other than put them in asylums. I know it took me about 4 years to get him diagnosed with it to get the care he needed, tho. The doctors refused with every visit to "label" him. I handed them the DSM IIIR (and later IV) and showed them all the symptoms of mild autism, and by all rights, the child is autistic, yet they refused.

It sounds like Aspergers Syndrome. It's on the 'Autism scale', but individuals can function at or above the norm scholastically. There is the theory that Einstein and others had it.

My son is 19 and has autism.PDD (pervasive development disorder). He functions well below grade level, but works part time through school at a local mini-mart. At every IEP I state my goal of him being semi-independent by age 25.

There are group homes and other semi-independent arrangements. The 25 year number is not something we wrote in stone but is simply something to have out there to provide a target for school and case workers. My opinion is that you have to give people a target. In Pennsylvania, special ed children can stay in school until age 21.

If it's the same in your state then they have at least 10 years to work with your son. If he is that high-functioning, then making a blanket determination like they did before he even hits puberty is wrong. He has not even completed the most important stage in his physical development.

There are a lot of high-functioning people with autism who are independent. Some of them have even turned their different world view into a career. Dr. Temple Grandin is a person with high functioning autism who is involved with livestock research http://www.grandin.com/ .

She's something of celebrity in the Autism community. In her case she was able to look at the system of pens and chutes and empathize with the animals to a point where she was able to design a less stessful system.

Someone with high-functioning autism who is two grade levels ahead has the same opportunities as someone without autism who is two grade levels ahead. In some cases, thinking differently has resulted in breakthroughs in mathematics and physics, where thinking outside the box can lead to results that 'normal' individuals might never have considered.

A paranoid schizoprhenic named John Nash won a Nobel Prize in mathematics. One of the worlds greatest physicists is in a wheelchair with ALS.

Don't let them tell you it can't be done. Give them a goal. Have it in every IEP. Your only issue is that since your son is above grade level, he is probably mainstreamed and will graduate at 18. Make sure that they work on socialization and living skills in high school. Find out if support ends at 18 or 21.

My wife is an expert at IEPs. She never really needed an advocate. I provided her with some Internet materials, she got a few pamphlets, and just asked questions.

Good luck.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.