The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Tell Me when to start Running (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=29091)

tw 06-05-2013 10:37 PM

Tell Me when to start Running
 
1 Attachment(s)
Andrea Barry Chantal Dorian Erin Fernand Gabrielle
Humberto Ingrid Jerry Karen Lorenzo Melissa Nestor
Olga Pablo Rebekah Sebastien Tanya Van Wendy
are this year's storms.

We are only one week into hurricane season. And already Tropical Storm Andrea has formed. It is currently in the Gulf of Mexico. Is predicted to travel up the American East Coast.

jimhelm 06-06-2013 12:05 AM

I heard someone on the radio say that the whoeverdoesthatshitologists say there will be appx 7 MAJOR Hurricanes this year. Not that they would all hit us... but that they would form. Preston and Steve. That's where I heard it. Well, the News Chick on that show, anyway. Wanna make OVER/UNDER bets?

Sundae 06-06-2013 01:03 AM

RUN! NOW!
We don't get them here. Thass all I'm saying.

tw 06-06-2013 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae (Post 867194)
We don't get them here. Thass all I'm saying.

Its projected path puts Andrea directed at the southern England coast. Arrival in maybe seven day. So you too can share in our rain.

We know a near zero category hurricane on the east coast can be hyped into a SuperStorm. Oh, the humanity!

Chocolatl 06-06-2013 08:00 AM

Gulf Coast resident, here. It has been poooouuuuuurrriiiiinnngggg all morning. Blegh.

Beest 06-06-2013 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae (Post 867194)
RUN! NOW!
We don't get them here. Thass all I'm saying.

LOL, perhaps your just too young to remember The Great Storm of '87 and poor old Micheal Fish telling everyone not to worry about it.

I always remembered this was the last blow of a Hurricane, but the wiki page doesn't mention that.

Sundae 06-06-2013 08:49 AM

I remember it in detail.
I walked to school in the aftermath, only to be turned back because the school had lost power. I felt like I was going to be blown off my feet, and in fact Dads came and collected me (on foot) from my friend's house because I was still quite a skinny little thing then.
And we live in a protected part of the country, weather-wise.

Dads does get really cross when people call it a hurricane though.
Because it wasn't.
Michael Foot was wrong however you look at it, but to hear Dad talk, it's one of the Great Injustices of the 20th Century.

Then again he thinks it was right to hang Derek Bentley, so I have learned to filter his opinion occasionally.
(Dad, not Michael Foot.)

Lamplighter 06-06-2013 08:50 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Tell Me when to start Running

...when the key word in Google Public Alerts is "R-U-N-N-O-F-T"


xoxoxoBruce 06-06-2013 09:16 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Just a natural cycle. ;)

Ocean's Edge 06-07-2013 03:27 PM

going out in half an hour to get dog ice cream ... already got all my french toast makings

tw 07-24-2013 11:46 PM

Quietly and futilely the African coast has been throwing tropical storms at us. All have missed. Dorian is now formed earlier than any other. Meaning next week, somebody should get rain.

Urbane Guerrilla 07-28-2013 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae (Post 867194)
RUN! NOW!
We don't get them here. Thass all I'm saying.

After all, Hartford, Hereford and Hampshire is where they hardly happen.

tw 08-15-2013 09:32 PM

The Gulf and Caribbean have not been particularly warm this year. A potential tropical storm is over the Yucatan peninsula where it probably will meander in the Gulf. However a small amount of warmer water does exist off Louisiana. Anybody need some rain?

An actual tropical storm Erin has formed after moving off of Africa. In relatively cooler water. Give it about a week to grow up and find civilization. If it follows the tracks of Dorian, it might skirt the Florida Atlantic coast.

Lamplighter 08-27-2013 06:50 PM

This is finally the way to get everyone's attention to hurricanes...


BigV 08-28-2013 11:42 AM

very funny!

Undertoad 08-28-2013 12:36 PM

Hurricanes are said to be evidence of global warming. However, there hasn't been a cat 3 hit the US in the eight years since Katrina. tw's threads and weather-predictors' "whoeverdoesthatshitologists say there will be appx 7 MAJOR Hurricanes this year" have resulted in nada.

Therefore global warming is over, right?

Or is warming actually much more complicated, and so this sort of snarky blaming and finger-pointing is just unhelpful political masturbation? Adding heat but no light to the GW debate?

I'm just saying.

http://cellar.org/2013/9j1YCnm.jpg

Lamplighter 08-28-2013 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 874440)

.
.
I agree with you, UT.

The Democrats and Obama should not be blamed for everything wrong with this country.
.

:rolleyes:

BigV 08-28-2013 04:25 PM

maybe you didn't get the joke.

the video wasn't about how many hurricanes we're having, it's about associating the damage from a hurricane with a given name; how it's unfair to castigate innocent people like Ivan and Andrew and Katrina and Sandy when they're not responsible for causing harm. the video suggests that the names should more accurately reflect the real sources of harm, *namely* (see what I did thar?), people in positions of influence who by their actions in concert with their beliefs that it is not caused by man-made activity are increasing that harm, but getting away with it because other names are being associated with the hurricanes.

but you probably already knew that, just as you probably already know that no one is suggesting that hurricanes are caused by climate change.

Marco Rubio, a denier.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rubio
Regarding "man-made global warming."

"I don't think there's the scientific evidence to justify it," Rubio said.

Michelle Bachmann, simple simpleton.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bachmann
"The big thing we are working on now is the global warming hoax. It's all voodoo, nonsense, hokum, a hoax."
...
"There isn’t one such study because carbon dioxide is not a harmful gas, it is a harmless gas. Carbon dioxide is natural. It is not harmful. It is part of Earth’s life cycle...And yet we’re being told that we have to reduce this natural substance and reduce the American standard of living to create an arbitrary reduction in something that is naturally occurring in the earth."

David Vitter, political hack/denier.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vitter
Evidence from liberals supporting climate change is often based on "ridiculous pseudo-science garbage," Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) charged Friday.

Vitter openly mocked an assertion by his Senate colleague Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), who said she can feel a change in climate as manifested by increased turbulence in her plane flights.

"Unfortunately, that's sort of the ridiculous pseudo-science garbage that's so common on the left on this issue," Vitter said

Collin Peterson, not a denier, not a Republican, a profiteer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peterson
"They’re saying to us [that climate change is] going to be a big problem because it’s going to be warmer than it usually is; my farmers are going to say that’s a good thing since they’ll be able to grow more corn."

John Boehner, an illusionist, misdirecting the audience with "carcinogen". He's not stupid, he's trying to distract.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boehner
"The idea that carbon dioxide is a carcinogen that is harmful to our environment is almost comical," Boehner said Sunday morning on ABC. "Every time we exhale, we emit carbon dioxide."

Rick Perry, stalwart business-first, last, always, monomaniac, unafraid self-acclaimed "skeptic" (just not businessmen who are scientists)

ironically, Forbes magazine site offered this cookie before continuing on to the story:
Quote:

Forbes Thought Of The Day
“ All business proceeds on beliefs, or judgments of probabilities, and not on certainties. ”
— Charles W. Eliot
hahahaha!!

the story

the author reiterates Perry's skepticism, but attempts to validate it with reference to Fred Singer's (A legendary denier of many things) sock puppet outfit "Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change"'s study saying 31 thousand scientists support Perry's position. now *that's* comical.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perry
“For us to take a snapshot in time and to say that what is going on in the country today, the climate change that is going on is man’s fault and we need to jeopardize America’s economy, I’m a skeptic about that…and I’m not afraid to say I’m a skeptic about that,”

Paul Ryan, denier *and* conspiracy theorist

Quote:

Ryan attacked the work of climatologists, suggesting that scientists might even be engaged in a conspiracy of sorts:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryan
At issue… are published e-mail exchanges from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU). These e-mails from leading climatologists make clear efforts to use statistical tricks to distort their findings and intentionally mislead the public on the issue of climate change.

The CRU e-mail scandal reveals a perversion of the scientific method, where data were manipulated to support a predetermined conclusion. The e-mail scandal has not only forced the resignation of a number of discredited scientists, but it also marks a major step back on the need to preserve the integrity of the scientific community. While interests on both sides of the issue will debate the relevance of the manipulated or otherwise omitted data, these revelations undermine confidence in the scientific data driving the climate change debates.


James Inhofe, denier and author.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inhofe
A perfect example is the entire global warming, climate-change issue, which is an effort to dramatically and hugely increase regulation of each of our lives and business, and to raise our cost of living and taxes. In The Greatest Hoax, Senator James Inhofe will reveal the reasons behind those perpetuating the Hoax of global warming, who is benefitting from the general acceptance of the Hoax and why the premise statements are blatantly and categorically false.

Jeff Sessions, denier and misunderstander of scientific method

(an observation, Sessions' pushback on legislative efforts to restrain the runaway acceleration in CO2 concentrations has been described as "Obama's Agitprop", more evidence of the closemindedness of the deniers)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sessions
“A forest fire is no proof of global warming,” said Senator Jeff Sessions, an Alabama Republican. “Give me a break.”

Paul Broun, anti-scientist placeholder (some would say stumbling block) on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

Quote:

Originally Posted by Broun
"God’s word is true. I’ve come to understand that. All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and the big bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of Hell. It’s lies to try to keep me and all the folks who were taught that from understanding that they need a savior. You see, there are a lot of scientific data that I’ve found out as a scientist that actually show that this is really a young Earth. I don’t believe that the earth’s but about 9,000 years old. I believe it was created in six days as we know them. That’s what the Bible says."

...

Paul Broun (R-Georgia) says that “Scientists all over this world say that the idea of human-induced global climate change is one of the greatest hoaxes perpetrated out of the scientific community.”

Darrell Issa, that circle fly orbiting Obama's ass angling for a bite

Quote:

Originally Posted by Issa
One of the difficulties in examining the issue of the climate change and greenhouse gases is that there is a wide range of scientific opinion on this issue and the science community does not agree to the extent of the problem or the critical threshold of when this problem is truly catastrophic.

Lamar Smith, *Chairman* of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smith
Contrary to the claims of those who want to strictly regulate carbon dioxide emissions and increase the cost of energy for all Americans, there is a great amount of uncertainty associated with climate science. These uncertainties undermine our ability to accurately determine how carbon dioxide has affected the climate in the past. They also limit our understanding of how anthropogenic emissions will affect future warming trends. Further confusing the policy debate, the models that scientists have come to rely on to make climate predictions have greatly overestimated warming. Contrary to model predictions, data released in October from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit show that global temperatures have held steady over the past 15 years, despite rising greenhouse gas emissions.

Among the facts that are clear, however, are that U.S. emissions contribute very little to global concentrations of greenhouse gas, and that even substantial cuts in these emissions are likely to have no effect on temperature. Data from the Energy Information Administration show, for example, that the United States cut carbon dioxide emissions by 12 percent between 2005 and 2012 while global emissions increased by 15 percent over the same period.

they're being called out.

Undertoad 08-28-2013 05:48 PM

That was a nice wall of text, now explain the joke I didn't get.

Lamplighter 08-28-2013 10:57 PM

Today, by coincidence (no statistics to prove it was not causal) there's another Representative on the list...

The Chestertown Spy

8/28/13

Rep. Andy Harris Presented With Climate Change Denier Award
Quote:

The Maryland League of Conservation Voters presented Maryland’s
U.S. Rep. Andy Harris with a “climate change denier award” on Tuesday
to call attention to what the organization calls the Republican lawmaker’s
“extreme anti-science views.”

The award, part of a nationwide day of action by conservationists to hold
climate change deniers accountable, was bestowed during separate events
at Harris’ offices in Chester and Bel Air.

tw 08-29-2013 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 874464)
That was a nice wall of text, now explain the joke I didn't get.

What joke? He demonstrated how dumb and ignorant people are when a political agenda is more important than reality and the advancement of mankind. Listen to Limbaugh and you too can be dumber than a Cellar monkey.

Wacko extremism is alive and well. Low intelligence is the result. Just another reason why the world needs more moderates.

Only joke is the reasoning used by extremists. Same logic also gleefully massacred 5000 American servicemen uselessly in Iraq. And blamed the victims for no government assistance in New Orleans for five days after Katrina.

Undertoad 08-29-2013 07:40 AM

V said it was a joke, numbnuts

tw 08-29-2013 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 874500)
V said it was a joke, numbnuts

Wacko extremists actually think they are logical. They loved it when they send 5000 American soldiers to a useless death. You think that is funny?

Undertoad 08-29-2013 08:39 AM

If you can manage it, consider participating in the actual discussion.

tw 08-29-2013 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 874508)
V said it was a joke, numbnuts.

Been drinking again, dic liquor?

Undertoad 08-29-2013 08:54 AM

Of course, the converse is also true: if you can't manage it, don't participate.

Lamplighter 08-29-2013 09:28 AM

... and we wonder why people drop away from the Cellar.

Clodfobble 08-29-2013 09:59 AM

Says the man who's been here for three years, to two men who have been here for 13+ years. :rolleyes:

Yes, I can do math--they were both here before this version of the site went live in Jan 2001.

Undertoad 08-29-2013 10:11 AM

In fact would you bear witness, Clod, that The Cellar and Undertoad were both more abrasive AND more popular 5-8 years ago?

Clodfobble 08-29-2013 10:15 AM

Sure. The community waxes and wanes. We ain't NYC right now, but we ain't Detroit either. The only thing that can be said to definitely never work is for one person to try to assert what the community is or should be. Human beings don't work like that, and this place is just crawling with them.

BigV 08-29-2013 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 874464)
That was a nice wall of text, now explain the joke I didn't get.

as to the joke,

the video makes these connections:

hurricanes cause lots of damage
hurricanes are named
people who've suffered damage are angry at people with those names (this is the fulcrum of the joke. of course the people who've had their house destroyed don't really hate "Sandy", but are shaking their fist at the heavens, they just happen to have a can of spray paint in their hand at the time and the shaking coincidentally follows the path of letters resembling "Sandy")
the authors of the video suggest that the anger these people feel shouldn't be directed at innocents named Ivan, Andrew, Sandy, Katrina, etc but at the real people who are really responsible, namely (hard to avoid that one, really) the politicians, Issa, Boehner, Broun, etc.
the authors suggest that the politicians are responsible by obstructing progress on legislative efforts to slow anthropogenic climate change

...

tl;dr

don't be mad at Sandy, be mad at Boehner, Smith, Inhofe, et al

Undertoad 08-29-2013 10:39 AM

well alrighty then

Undertoad 08-29-2013 10:41 AM

Clod would you say I should be more abrasive, or less? Because I was thinking about nudging it up a notch, you know, it can be fun that way sometimes.

glatt 08-29-2013 10:42 AM

My toddler was distressed when a hurricane shared her name and people were saying how bad that hurricane was. She knew they weren't talking about her, but it still bothered her.

BigV 08-29-2013 10:47 AM

I'm not Clodfobble, but I'll give you my opinion.

Depends.

It depends on the situation, sometimes more abrasiveness is called for, sometimes not. What would you be hoping to accomplish? In general, I appreciate (among other things) your calmness, your mellowness, not your abrasiveness.

Undertoad 08-29-2013 11:11 AM

I dunno, I just feel like sometimes I stifle myself here. But that's good feedback, thanks.

BigV 08-29-2013 11:54 AM

1 Attachment(s)
You're welcome.

This is what I think most of the time when I'm here.

Attachment 45295

ps, you should really click on the link for the full effect.

Clodfobble 08-29-2013 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 874539)
Clod would you say I should be more abrasive, or less? Because I was thinking about nudging it up a notch, you know, it can be fun that way sometimes.

I dunno, I think you should be you. I don't think you should stifle yourself, for sure. I have seen you, and all regulars including myself, go through moods that have sometimes not just been daily but months- or years-long phases. No one on the planet is the same person they were ten years ago. It might be harder to remember that here, where we don't necessarily have the visual picture of aging constantly reminding us, but we all change nonetheless. And that's cool--less abrasive this year, more abrasive next year, it's all still part of you and your story. I do think most people view the community as a whole when deciding whether to stick around, there's not some extra responsibility on you to be a consummate host. Be whoever you feel like being today.

xoxoxoBruce 08-29-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 874539)
Clod would you say I should be more abrasive, or less? Because I was thinking about nudging it up a notch, you know, it can be fun that way sometimes.

Big mistake, trying to plan your act in advance, don't try to gage your response. Go with the gut, and I think you'll give appropriate to what you get most of the time. But if it isn't, well fuck it, that's the way of the world.

tw 09-15-2013 07:47 AM

Mexico is getting hit on the west coast by Tropical Storm Manual and on the east coast by Hurricane Ingrid. It does rain in Mexico.

Griff 09-15-2013 10:56 AM

I guess I'll have to go now.

tw 09-15-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 876127)
I guess I'll have to go now.

Do you really need a shower that badly?

Griff 09-15-2013 04:40 PM

[james]I've never really been...[/taylor]

tw 10-04-2013 07:56 PM

A near zero hurricane Karen (similar to near zero SuperStorm Sandy) is approaching the New Orleans region. Since everything that should not be there was removed some years ago, this storm will do damage equivalent to what Sandy should have done. Or were the richest among us permitted to build where nothing should be built?

xoxoxoBruce 10-04-2013 08:15 PM

This Old House last week was at the Jersey Shore where blocks of houses were destroyed. They were talking to all these people who were rebuilding but the main floor was raised 10 ft so they'll "never have to worry again".

That made me think of William Jeanes and his wife during Katrina.

Quote:

Our house at 116 West Scenic Drive in Pass Christian, Mississippi, sat 30 feet above sea level and perhaps 60 yards from the shoreline of the Gulf of Mexico. In the hours before Katrina, soothsayers and entrails readers at the networks predicted a worst-case scenario of the sea surging 19 to 21 feet higher than normal. But we have a two-story house, and the upper floor sits 11 or 12 feet above the ground, and there are no interior stairways. Which is why we spent the entire nightmare on the second floor.
~snip~
Consider that our lot is 72 feet across. A symmetrical cubic yard of water is three feet wide, so 24 of the watery cubes would stretch the width of the property. The surge at its zenith sent water more than three yards high at us, meaning that as many as 72 cubic yards of water were pasting the house at any given moment. Seventy-two cubic yards of water weighs 60.6 tons, and if that's not enough to chill your nipples, the water was moving at 30 or 35 mph.
~snip~
"Look at that," Susan said, pointing to the kitchen floor. Foot-square black-and-white tiles, giving the effect of a giant checkered flag, floored the large room. The flag was waving.
"Never have to worry again."

tw 10-04-2013 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 878696)
This Old House last week was at the Jersey Shore where blocks of houses were destroyed. They were talking to all these people who were rebuilding but the main floor was raised 10 ft so they'll "never have to worry again".

One friend is planning a reconstruction. FEMA maps suddenly suggested he may have to add one or two cinder blocks to the foundation.

In Ocean City NJ, some homes were temporarily sbout 15 feet this summer so that a new foundation can be constructed underneath. One house just down the street from another friend was raised so that five cinder blocks (almost four feet) were added to that foundation. Many new businesses are now advertising house razing.

As for blocks of damage, only place I saw anywhere near that much damage is Mantoloking. Where a street leaving that barrier island was only about two feet above high tide. Where maybe 20 miles of Barnegat Bay needed a new inlet to drain the entire northern half of that bay, the Metedeconk River and other inland tributaries. And where McMansion owners are fighting Gov Christie's demand for building sand dunes.

They want their expensive homes as close as possible to the ocean. Then want you to sympathize when their McMansions are damaged by a near zero hurricane.

xoxoxoBruce 10-04-2013 09:12 PM

They had aerial footage of lots of destroyed homes, and testimony from homeowners who returned to find their houses not where they were... or gone.

The three they are focusing on the rebuild, in Bay Head, Point Pleasant, and Manasquan, were flooded but not destroyed. Hey their show is about rehabbing old houses, not building new. :haha:

tw 11-19-2013 12:22 AM

Plenty of tropical storms. But they keep going in the wrong direction. Another one would rather head for England. Tropical Storm Melissa just formed in the Atlantic east of Bermuda. Hurricane season has 12 more days.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.