The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Home Base (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   All in favor of banning Emma the Troll? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=21479)

Radar 11-25-2009 04:34 PM

All in favor of banning Emma the Troll?
 
Emma Walker is the most recent childish, ignorant, poorly educated, ugly, nasty, disgusting, little troll to disturb the flow of things in the Cellar. She has very quickly proven that she knows nothing, thinks she knows everything, and will annoy and alienate every person on the board.

DanaC 11-25-2009 04:35 PM

I think so.

Pico and ME 11-25-2009 04:47 PM

Too bad people couldn't just refrain from responding to her. It would be interesting to see how long she would last then.

Otherwise ...ban her. What she is doing is no different from the prank calls teenager used to do back in the day.

Radar 11-25-2009 04:48 PM

We've got 100% so far in favor of banning. By the way, I was never as bad as she is.

monster 11-25-2009 04:48 PM

jon_bainz memorial post
 
Sadly, it will fuel her mis-informed self-importance, but at least she'll have to bug someone else about it. Or maybe she'll actually fit in at Principia Discordia. It'll certainly be a challenge for her to stand out there, in the presence of so many trolls who are so much better, smarter (and hotter) than she is. They probably won't mind the pics, though.

The smarter they think they are, the more it hurts when they get beaten. Fortunately she will count this one as a victory so we need feel no guilt.

Ban :thumbsdn:

Radar 11-25-2009 04:49 PM

I don't care how she feels about it as long as she's feeling it somewhere else.

lumberjim 11-25-2009 04:53 PM

ban your face

Flint 11-25-2009 04:56 PM

Starring_Emma is the COOLEST
Starring_Emma is the COOLEST
Starring_Emma is the COOLEST
Starring_Emma is the COOLEST
Starring_Emma is the COOLEST
Starring_Emma is the COOLEST
Starring_Emma is the COOLEST
Starring_Emma is the COOLEST

Radar 11-25-2009 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 612103)
ban your face

That hurt Jim. *sniff*

regular.joe 11-25-2009 05:02 PM

It would be nice to be able to find out who "she" really is. If she is who she says she is, I'm not for banning, I'd rather be a decent influence. She would have to stick around for that to happen. We would have to be the adults in this one. If she is not who she says she is, then banning is definitely in order.

monster 11-25-2009 05:03 PM

Ah Flint, we've been waiting.

lumberjim 11-25-2009 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar (Post 612117)
That hurt Jim. *sniff*

I'm sorry....

it hurt me more than it hurt you....

but you're doing it wrong. Coventry?

Pico and ME 11-25-2009 05:16 PM

What is coventry?

lumberjim 11-25-2009 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pico and ME (Post 612130)
What is coventry?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Send_to_Coventry

DanaC 11-25-2009 05:38 PM

I went to Coventry once. For a day trip.

BrianR 11-25-2009 05:38 PM

I vote we educate her instead.

If I came into the Cellar now as myself at her age, you'd ban me too. But I turned out all right. Kids need mentors. But if the egregarious trolling continues, perhaps some milder discipline is called for, perhaps muting for a week while the mods train her to be a good little poster?

DanaC 11-25-2009 05:40 PM

Bah. That's extremely reasonable. I probably shouldn't be voting or expressing an opinion just now, as I'm in a foul mood.

lumberjim 11-25-2009 05:42 PM

want some chicken?

http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s...giant_cock.jpg

monster 11-25-2009 05:42 PM

I think a user title like Radar had when he asked who Bri was would be funny....

Pico and ME 11-25-2009 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianR (Post 612143)
I vote we educate her instead.

If I came into the Cellar now as myself at her age, you'd ban me too. But I turned out all right. Kids need mentors. But if the egregarious trolling continues, perhaps some milder discipline is called for, perhaps muting for a week while the mods train her to be a good little poster?


Jeez...come on. She does not want to be a good little poster.

DanaC 11-25-2009 05:43 PM

@ Monnie:remind me?

BrianR 11-25-2009 05:46 PM

If not, well, we've dealt with THAT kind before...

Didn't The ShitHammer come along with some of the old users somewhere?

Griff 11-25-2009 05:53 PM

Aye. Ban.
Inappropriate images from a minor or a cop, no winners here.

Dagney 11-25-2009 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 612138)

Thanks Jim, I was wonderin meself. And I vote for it!

Sheldonrs 11-25-2009 06:19 PM

I vote to ban her. I'm running out of cunt comments and I need them for the Palin threads.

Trilby 11-25-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheldonrs (Post 612209)
I vote to ban her. I'm running out of cunt comments and I need them for the Palin threads.

*grins* well, you've got to call 'em like you see 'em.

DanaC 11-25-2009 06:23 PM

lol

SamIam 11-25-2009 07:07 PM

Didn't I already post here? I'm starting to get confused. Anyway, ban. She's on a quest to get banned anyway, so why not give her what she wants? Then she'll be free to irritate a whole new board.

ZenGum 11-25-2009 09:21 PM

Maybe I am sadistic, but banning is in a way a reward for her attention seeking, so I'd rather we all just ignored her. Or we could set the dogs on her.

She is tiresome, I expect banning will be necessary sooner or later.

I see a few references to inappropriate images. I haven't gone looking for them, but that would count as using the cellar to break the law.

xoxoxoBruce 11-25-2009 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by regular.joe (Post 612118)
It would be nice to be able to find out who "she" really is. If she is who she says she is, I'm not for banning, I'd rather be a decent influence. She would have to stick around for that to happen. We would have to be the adults in this one. If she is not who she says she is, then banning is definitely in order.

She's real, joe. Pretty much everything she's posted is true, as far as I can tell, except the Baltimore location.
I'm not for banning. I've been entertained by the reaction being almost exactly what I imagined, when I checked her out before approving her posts.
I am surprised, however, at some peoples inability to just ignore her. Guess it's been too quiet around here. :haha:

lumberjim 11-25-2009 10:20 PM

totally

Juniper 11-25-2009 10:42 PM

When my hubby was about ten or so, his mother had a nightmare about those troll dolls. When she woke up, she said they were evil and went through the house looking for them, went through the kids' toy box and their rooms and threw them all in the trash. She passed away a few years ago, but I remember hubby and his sister mentioning this to her once. Her eyes got all fierce and she just about screamed at them I DON'T LIKE THOSE TROLLS, THEY'RE EVIL. Must have been one hell of a nightmare.

monster 11-25-2009 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starring_Emma (Post 612382)
Are you a conservative? Because I fined that liberals make for bad educators. There always stoned and thinking about gay sex.



Should Emma be fined for that?

I found Emma's Dad's profile, btw, He's not quite as important as she makes out (big surprise)

monster 11-25-2009 10:47 PM

btw isn't 12 out of 20 voters a somewhat bigger majority than the last repub pres was elected with? looks like she's got it made...

Juniper 11-25-2009 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monster (Post 612393)
Should Emma be fined for that?

I found Emma's Dad's profile, btw, He's not quite as important as she makes out (big surprise)

VERY interesting. :eyebrow:

classicman 11-25-2009 11:23 PM

Ban the twit.

monster 11-25-2009 11:23 PM

Re you calling Emma's dad a twit?

Sundae 11-26-2009 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 612138)

Actually, there is a more specific use that UT can instigate.
I'm not going to say any more, because I think it's a reasonable semi-secret defence mechanism.

UT thinks it's a mind-fuck and won't play though.
Pansy vegemite-eating liberal.

xoxoxoBruce 11-26-2009 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starring_Emma (Post 612441)
START GOOGLING

You have yet to post from Baltimore... nice try.

regular.joe 11-26-2009 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starring_Emma (Post 612401)
I'm a moral Christian conservative and moral Christian conservatives don't have inappropriate images of them selves.

YOU'VE BEEN LIED TO BY LYING LIBERALS!
They're probably on drugs and thinking about sex with small farm animals too! Because that's what liberals do.

I'm thinking about becoming an immoral Christian conservative, then I'd be part of the majority.

Griff 11-26-2009 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by regular.joe (Post 612572)
I'm thinking about becoming an immoral Christian conservative, then I'd be part of the majority.

There is a how to book.

Trilby 11-26-2009 07:53 AM

regular.joe doesn't believe in ROUS's? Is that like not believing in DRG's?

BrianR 11-26-2009 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starring_Emma (Post 612382)
Are you a conservative? Because I fined that liberals make for bad educators. There always stoned and thinking about gay sex.

I do not take illegal drugs, not even once to try them. Ask anyone. And you can learn something from ANYONE if you pay enough attention.

My politics are not what should concern you, young lady. This Grammar Police Badge however... I'm going to write you a warning this time.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Starring_Emma (Post 612385)
I'm already an awesome little poster... why would I want to just be a "good" little poster.

That is a matter of opinion. To the rest of this community, you have practically flooded us with new posts in a very short time, without giving us enough time to get to know you and adjust to your...ebullient... personality.

In our experience, young people such as yourself do not last very long by your very nature. You have gone by many names. Weems. Christmas modemer. ETC.

Some of you have stayed long enough to blend in, others have not. A few have had to be forcibly removed. One or two are still invoked when appropriate, usually for the laughs.

So, your first lesson: Approach any group of us as you would a clique of girls at your school. Dress like us, speak like us, get to know us before you interrupt our conversations or make comments about our boyfriends "read: politics/sexuality/<insert comment here>" Or else risk similar consequences, being ignored, avoided or even expelled.

Know this: The person(s) to whom you are speaking in any situation has (have) been here longer than you and, for better or worse, been accepted. Radar is not everyone's favorite person here, but he's been a known quantity for some time and has established himself. Lumberjim can rankle anyone, anytime. But we know him, he's been met in person by more than one of us, myself included. And he, too, has established himself.

My advice to you, Emma, is to be truthful with us. We have resources that you do not yet understand. We can track you anywhere in the world. The chances are, one of us has been to the places you describe and will be able to tell if you are lying. We have a finely-tuned ability to smell out dishonesty. A relationship based in dishonesty is not going to last. Just be yourself, and a little quieter. Go for quality over quantity in your posts. And pay more attention in English class! All we see is your writing and it tells us a LOT about who you are.

There are a few clues in writing that communicate volumes to us in our little electronic world. Capital lettering, when used properly, can indicate emphasis, or a strident tone of voice. Run-on sentences, text-speak, immature grammar, these all indicate youth and, usually, someone who will not last long enough to get to know, and thus are ignored.

Baiting established users is poor behaviour that is rarely tolerated. Leave that for later, when you've gotten to know how it's done. Flame wars are definitely not tolerated here.

Most new entrants throw one or possibly two pebbles into our figurative pond as an introduction. We have threads for this purpose. Feel free to resurrect one and introduce yourself in the usual way. Read a few to see how it's done. You have thrown a handful of stones into our little pond and we need a chance to assimilate you in our own way. Be patient, young grasshopper. I know it goes against your philosophy, but let us judge your worthiness to join our group. We judge not on looks but on character, content and suitability.

The average age here is far higher than your own. There are many college degrees represented here as well as far more life experience than you have seen. You are still young, yet are trying to insinuate yourself into a mostly adult group. You can yet become a conforming nonconformist like the rest of us, or act the spoiled, petulant child and risk being shunned. To quote Rush Limbaugh, "Words mean things." More so here than most other forums, which is why we are here instead of there.

Now, why are YOU here? To join? Entertain? Or to annoy, interrupt and destroy our harmony?

Think about your answer and let us know when you are ready to decide. There is no time limit. Begin!

Brian

lumberjim 11-26-2009 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae Girl (Post 612545)
Actually, there is a more specific use that UT can instigate.
I'm not going to say any more, because I think it's a reasonable semi-secret defence mechanism.

UT thinks it's a mind-fuck and won't play though.
Pansy vegemite-eating liberal.

i actually agree with him..... and it's better if it's done manually. that way, the pot still gets stirred....which this place needs from time to time...... but it's not all discussions about how this newbie ruining the signal to noise ratio.

plus it's bound to start some collateral feuding....which we all just love. i mean look...the drama even brought ali out of hiding...shocked i am, shocked.

Sundae 11-26-2009 10:40 AM

Good try Brian.
I'll cut n paste next time we get a feisty youngen rather than a shit-stirrer.

Good point LJ.
And it is fun of course.
And Ali back is a bonus.
I just want UT to be like Godzilla in Tokyo every now and then.

Nirvana 11-26-2009 10:58 AM

I think even most of those people on that forum just like the majority here agree that you are a "mother" just not the kind that has children. :eyebrow:

BrianR 11-26-2009 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starring_Emma (Post 612591)
I'm here to help !

You should have noted my awesomeness by now!

Sorry, I must have missed your "awesomeness". It was masked by MY surgically enlarged ego.

BrianR 11-26-2009 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae Girl (Post 612600)
Good try Brian.
I'll cut n paste next time we get a feisty young'un rather than a shit-stirrer.

I always try my best. I have more lessons in my curriculum, trust me. I'm not convinced Emma is a shit-stirrer or a troll. Yet. But I've been wrong before...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.