The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Nothingland (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   Have you ever butt-ƒucked a dead dog in the ass? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=21192)

Flint 10-17-2009 03:14 PM

Have you ever butt-ƒucked a dead dog in the ass?
 
Please be honest--this is an anonymous poll. . . . I'm doing...research.

Henry 10-17-2009 04:27 PM

May we ask where else one would butt-fuck a dog but in the ass?

Elspode 10-17-2009 04:32 PM

Well, she *was* pretty damn ugly, so, yeah. No, wait. She was alive. Just dead drunk.

limey 10-17-2009 04:58 PM

I've just voted no. I wish I could think of a witty reason why!

ZenGum 10-17-2009 06:29 PM

What if it was a dead ass, and I ... in the ...

elSicomoro 10-17-2009 08:01 PM

Hey, Flint has butt-fucked people in the mouth, so...there you go.

monster 10-17-2009 08:10 PM

No but We've just got through thor's birthday party and I could introduce you to an 8yo who most probably would. After he killed it. Beest and I independantly noted that he has mass-murderer tendancies. He is already into stomping on dead birds that he finds in the back yard (thanks demeter) and making his penis the center of attention. butt-fucking dead dogs is probably on tomorrow's to-do list

Tulip 10-17-2009 09:07 PM

what kind of research are you doing, Flint??!!?? :eek: To see how many people would even answer this question? :eyebrow:

smoothmoniker 10-17-2009 09:56 PM

It was only mostly-dead.

Cloud 10-17-2009 10:07 PM

Sometimes I do not like the Cellar.

lumberjim 10-17-2009 10:49 PM

old lady

Cloud 10-17-2009 10:59 PM

yeah? maybe if I'm old enough I'll get dementia and forget shit like this. I should be so lucky.

Juniper 10-17-2009 11:39 PM

I'm going to assume it's something metaphorical, and sidle away.

TheDaVinciChode 10-18-2009 01:15 PM

Isn't this title a little... redundant?

I mean, honestly, where else can you butt-fudge a person, or critter?

Unless you're asking whether anyone has ever butt-fudged a dead dog, whilst inside a donkey? Something akin to when Luke Skywalker was placed inside a dead Tauntaun, only with additional bestiality thrown in, for good measure?

Furthermore... Who voted "yes?" ;)

Griff 10-18-2009 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henry (Post 601630)
May we ask where else one would butt-fuck a dog but in the ass?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaVinciChode (Post 601781)
Isn't this title a little... redundant?

You guys are new here.

I'm concerned about the ethical implications. How can a dead dog give consent?

TheDaVinciChode 10-18-2009 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 601816)
I'm concerned about the ethical implications. How can a dead dog give consent?

Silent consent. Whereby consent is implied, but not verbalised. ;)

Clodfobble 10-18-2009 05:20 PM

It's fine, as long as it's at least 2.6 years old.

bluecuracao 10-18-2009 05:35 PM

The dog, or its corpse? :unsure:

xoxoxoBruce 10-18-2009 07:31 PM

2.6 X 7 = 18.2 ;)

regular.joe 10-18-2009 07:53 PM

Cloud, I sympathize, I can't get these last two minutes back...ever.

monster 10-18-2009 08:03 PM

Sure you can. and with you being in Iraq and all, you may be reliving those two minutes sooner than you think -just live them better the second time around, mmmkay?

sexobon 10-19-2009 02:44 AM

This thread is just a feeble attempt by Flint to make dead dogs the new hobos! I'm not buying into it. :headshake

limey 10-19-2009 03:00 AM

Well at least it isn't in the "relationships" section!

regular.joe 10-19-2009 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monster (Post 601852)
Sure you can. and with you being in Iraq and all, you may be reliving those two minutes sooner than you think -just live them better the second time around, mmmkay?


I LOLed. Thanks.

monster 10-19-2009 10:26 AM

yw. You could even stick googly eyes on them ;) or on the dead dog..... now there's something you could do with the two minutes..... but then that might make them not have been wasted the first time around because then you would have been able to contribute meaningfully to the thread and so then you wouldn't need to relive them differently but then if you didn't relive them differently in the first place then you would need to because you'd still be complaining about them......and then fl1nts head will go asplodey and you'll think it's the enemy set off mortars and you'll shoot them before they get you and then you won't be reliveing those two minutes after all.....

regular.joe 10-19-2009 03:20 PM

You truly have a dizzying intellect.

regular.joe 10-19-2009 03:21 PM

Yea, I'm still lurking around this thread, wasting my time I suppose.

monster 10-20-2009 07:07 AM

This thread suggests that Spencer and Darwin's survival of the fittest theories may also be relevant to teh interwebz.

Madman 10-27-2009 09:26 AM

:eyebrow:I think I voted no, but I'm not sure.

Sheldonrs 10-27-2009 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monster (Post 602174)
This thread suggests that Spencer and Darwin's survival of the fittest theories may also be relevant to teh interwebz.

Well, when dealing with any kind of butt-fucking, it's always about fit.

Gravdigr 10-30-2009 09:58 AM

It wasn't dead when I started...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 601816)
You guys are new here.

I'm concerned about the ethical implications. How can a dead dog give consent?

More importantly, how can he refuse?

TheMercenary 10-30-2009 02:25 PM

Well she was breathing when I picked her up in the bar last night. And she really didn't look that doggeredly until the morning.

Flint 10-30-2009 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 604595)
Well she was breathing when I picked her up in the bar last night. And she really didn't look that doggeredly until the morning.

I used to play in a blues/rock band that had a song called "Went home at 2 with a 10, Woke up at 10 with a 2"


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.