The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   It's all up to Franken now! (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=20169)

Sheldonrs 04-28-2009 01:23 PM

It's all up to Franken now!
 
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articl...28specter.html

Specter says he's switching from GOP to Dems

April. 28, 2009 09:09 AM
Associated Press
WASHINGTON - Veteran Republican Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania disclosed plans Tuesday to switch parties, a move intended to boost his chances of winning re-election next year that also will push Democrats within one seat of a 60-vote filibuster-resistant majority.

"I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans," Specter said in a statement posted on a Web site devoted to Pennsylvania politics and confirmed by his office. Several Senate officials said a formal announcement was expected later in the day or Wednesday.

President Barack Obama called Specter almost immediately after he was informed of the decision to say the Democratic Party was "thrilled to have you," according to a White House official.
Specter, 79 and in his fifth term, is one of a handful of Republican moderates remaining in Congress in a party now dominated by conservatives. Several officials said secret talks that preceded his decision reached into the White House, involving both Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden, a longtime colleague in the Senate. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell as well as Democratic leaders in Congress also were involved, added the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose details.

With Specter, Democrats would have 59 Senate seats. Democrat Al Franken is ahead in a marathon recount in Minnesota, and if he ultimately wins his race against Republican Norm Coleman, he would become the party's 60th vote. That is the number needed to overcome a filibuster.

Specter faced an extraordinarily difficult re-election challenge in his home state in 2010, having first to confront a challenge from his right in the Republican primary before pivoting to a general election campaign against a Democrat in a state that has trended increasingly Democratic in recent elections.

He has publicly acknowledged in recent months that in order to win a sixth term, he would need the support of thousands of Pennsylvania Republicans who sided with Obama in last fall's presidential election.

"I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate," he said in the statement.

Asked by a reporter what he had to say to his constituents, Specter replied with a smile, "I don't have to say anything to them. They said it to me."

In Pennsylvania, the chairman of the state Republican Party, Rob Gleason, said that Specter should offer a refund to Republicans who have helped fatten his war chest, which totaled $5.8 million at the end of 2008. "He should give them the option," Gleason said.

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said in a statement: "Some in the Republican Party are happy about this. I am not. Let's be honest: Senator Specter didn't leave the GOP based on principles of any kind. He left to further his personal political interests because he knew that he was going to lose a Republican primary due to his left-wing voting record. Republicans look forward to beating Sen. Specter in 2010, assuming the Democrats don't do it first."

Specter has long been one of the most durable politicians of either party in Pennsylvania. In recent years, he has battled Hodgkin's disease, a cancer of the lymphatic system, but maintains a busy schedule that includes daily games of squash.

As one of the most senior Republicans in the Senate, Specter held powerful positions on the Judiciary and Appropriations committees. It was not clear how Democrats would calculate his seniority in assigning committee perches.

Specter has long been an independent Republican, and he proved it most recently when he became one of only three members of the GOP in Congress to vote for Obama's economic stimulus legislation.

As recently as late winter, he was asked by a reporter why he had not taken Democrats up on past offers to switch parties.

"Because I am a Republican," he said at the time.

"I welcome Sen. Specter and his moderate voice to our diverse caucus," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said in a statement.

A senior White House official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because no announcement has yet been made, said at 10:25 a.m. EDT Tuesday President Barack Obama was handed a note while in the Oval Office during his daily economic briefing. The note said: "Specter is announcing he is changing parties." At 10:32, Obama reached Specter by phone and told him "you have my full support" and that the Democratic Party is "thrilled to have you."

glatt 04-28-2009 01:52 PM

Very interesting. I predict the Franken recount will be dragged out even longer by the national Republican party now.

Spexxvet 04-28-2009 02:19 PM

It's about time! I'm a Democrat, and have voted for Spcter every election because his views are mostly in line with mine.

classicman 04-28-2009 02:50 PM

Very interesting indeed. Spector has been left leaning for a long time, but took shelter in the comfort of the GOP. Noe that the R's are in complete disarray he finally jumps ship. I wonder if he got some financial support from the D's and a few other "assurances."
He has $5+ million to work with - the vast majority of which was from Republican donors. He has also offered to give it back if they want it.
Interesting indeed.

Jill 04-28-2009 03:28 PM

I think this is great news for the country. It would have been nice if Specter could have helped lead his former party away from the disaster they've become, but he'll be a welcome moderate voice inside the Democratic Party to help us avoid a similar fate.

Welcome, Senator Specter.

Undertoad 04-28-2009 06:17 PM

I voted for Specter, and this is a self-fulfilling destiny for the Republican Party, who systematically drove him out by turning hard right. This state was going to elect any Democrat rather than Specter primary candidate Pat Toomey, and it will elect Specter as a Democrat over Toomey in 2010. The hard-liners are saying "don't let the door hit you on the way out!" and so they fail to learn any hard lessons from this.

wolf 04-28-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

"I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate," he said in the statement.
Does anybody else find this statement scary?

At least he's now properly labelled.

Redux 04-28-2009 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 561178)
I voted for Specter, and this is a self-fulfilling destiny for the Republican Party, who systematically drove him out by turning hard right. This state was going to elect any Democrat rather than Specter primary candidate Pat Toomey, and it will elect Specter as a Democrat over Toomey in 2010. The hard-liners are saying "don't let the door hit you on the way out!" and so they fail to learn any hard lessons from this.

The Republican Party tent is getting smaller and smaller and most within the party dont seem to mind, preferring to maintain a rigid ideological test over electability.

Most recently they blew a chanced to win back a House seat in a red district with the special election in upstate NY by running the most right wing candidate, who lost to a moderate Democrat.

Who is leading this sinking ship?

tw 04-28-2009 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redux (Post 561180)
Who is leading this sinking ship?

Rush Limbaugh. Newt Gingrich and Pat Buchanan have both taken stabs at trying to get control of the party. But the extremists are even too right wing for them.

When is the final court decision expect?

TGRR 04-28-2009 09:13 PM

This is hardly surprising. The GOP has been throwing a constant tantrum since 2006 - worse after 2008 - and are now attacking their own, should anyone stray from the fold in the slightest.

Steele's comments about Specter are a precise example of this.

TheMercenary 04-28-2009 09:26 PM

Go Arlen!

tw 04-28-2009 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 561178)
This state was going to elect any Democrat rather than Specter primary candidate Pat Toomey, and it will elect Specter as a Democrat over Toomey in 2010.

Unfortunately that says much about the voters. Too many now vote party lines rather than see the whats and whys that make a good politician. Moderates (such as this author who is independent) cannot vote for Specter (or anyone else) in primary elections. Therefore those who are Specter's greatest supporters cannot help him.

Arlen Specter is a conservative moderate. So close to being a centrist as to be hated by the Republican party's right wing power brokers.

Those outside America have no appreciation of how many times Arlen Specter stood up against efforts to pervert the American Constitution. He has done so by making stands against members of both parties. He did this at great political risk because he put America ahead of the Republican party. So the Republican party hates him. A good Republican is expected to put the party agenda first; American principles second. In the Senate, few have done more to promote America and protect Constitutional guarantees even when it risks his political career.

The man is a thinker first, party member second. He will probably be just as ornery as a Democrat. Good is to remind both parties who they are supposed to work for.

ZenGum 04-29-2009 12:44 AM

Specter??? That's spooky. He doesn't stand a ghost of a chance, but I admire his spirit.

Trilby 04-29-2009 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenGum (Post 561273)
Specter??? That's spooky. He doesn't stand a ghost of a chance, but I admire his spirit.

yoinked to HOF.

classicman 04-29-2009 09:35 AM

Single Bullet Theory

Apollo 04-30-2009 02:16 PM

Question: Does "the magic number" of 60 really mean anything? I never thought that filibusters were common occurrences anymore. Is there any other benefit of having 60 seats? It seems like the Dems are already controlling most of the legislation as it is...

Redux 04-30-2009 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apollo (Post 561669)
Question: Does "the magic number" of 60 really mean anything? I never thought that filibusters were common occurrences anymore. Is there any other benefit of having 60 seats? It seems like the Dems are already controlling most of the legislation as it is...

The Republicans set a record number cloture votes last session of Congress ...more than doubling any previous Congress.
Quote:

Nearly 1 in 6 roll-call votes in the Senate this year have been cloture votes. If this pace of blocking legislation continues, this 110th Congress will be on track to roughly triple the previous record number of cloture votes — 58 each in the two Congresses from 1999-2002, according to the Senate Historical Office.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/226/story/18218.html
http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/...filiate.91.jpg
I think the final count last session was over 110.
And this was with a Republican in the White House with veto power.

At one time, not too long ago, filibusters were used primarily to block controversial judicial appointments and/or sweeping legislative initiatives that seriously divided the country. For the Republicans now in the minority, it has become routine to force a vote to cut-off debate.

It is not illegal or unethical....just hypocritical on the part of Republicans, particularly when it thwarts the will of a more than narrow will of the American people.

Yes it matters.

Sheldonrs 04-30-2009 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apollo (Post 561669)
Question: Does "the magic number" of 60 really mean anything? I never thought that filibusters were common occurrences anymore. Is there any other benefit of having 60 seats? It seems like the Dems are already controlling most of the legislation as it is...

It's important in that, if the democrats want to pass a bill in the senate, they can do it no matter if every republican is against it. And the repubs can't filibuster (which happens a lot) to block the vote.

Of course, all this is assuming that the Dems all vote together too.

Apollo 04-30-2009 06:17 PM

I see, I see. Yeah I always knew that the magic number blocked filibusters, so obviously it would be significant. My real question was whether anybody uses filibusters anymore, which Redux pretty much answered for me.

I had no idea that there that many cloture votes!

tw 04-30-2009 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apollo (Post 561727)
I see, I see. Yeah I always knew that the magic number blocked filibusters, so obviously it would be significant. My real question was whether anybody uses filibusters anymore, which Redux pretty much answered for me.

Taking the same problem from another level. Republican party has a serious internal problem. It has no leader. It has too many members entrenched in political agendas. Infighting has become so heated as to drive many (especially moderate Republicans) out and to alienate the troops. As a result, the party is not able to compromise with Democrats. That is the worst situations for anyone who is more interested in America. The deadlock and infighting makes it impossible for moderate Democrats, Republicans, and those of independent stature to solve any problems. Any Republican who even looks like he has compromised with a Democrat is beaten and destroyed by what is now a raging mob.

Two ways around this. First Republicans find someone with leadership abilities. Or Democrats get sufficient votes to quash any filibuster. The latter situation would force Republicans to settle their differences, find a leader, and start working for America. Which means cooperating with Democrats again.

A politican must eventually decide whether he works for America or for party extremists. This exclusive OR condition applies to both parties.

sugarpop 05-01-2009 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolf (Post 561179)
Does anybody else find this statement scary?

At least he's now properly labelled.

wolf, what he meant by that statement is, the Republican Party has been backing hard right wing candidates in rebublican primaries against moderate incumbants. The moderate incumbant ends up losing to the hard right candidate, but then the republicans lose in the general election because the candidates are too extreme and people vote for the democrat. It makes no sense. They are giving up seats in order to "purify the party." They were backing another candidate against Specter in the upcoming primaries in 2010. Arlen Specter wasn't willing to just let his seat go. (Primaries never have the number of people voting as the general elections.) In the general election against an extreme candidate he will probably be able to hold on to his seat as a democrat.

Spexxvet 05-01-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apollo (Post 561669)
... Is there any other benefit of having 60 seats? ...

The Democrats get to leave early on Fridays, and get an extra serving of ice cream at lunch.:D

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarpop (Post 561832)
Arlen Specter wasn't willing to just let his seat go.

Because it is about his desire to hang on to power and not losing his job. And for no other reason.

Undertoad 05-02-2009 07:30 AM

The Club for "Growth" ran an unelectable candidate against him in the primary.

The party pushed him out and said good riddance and did a little dance afterwards.

It's exactly what the Ds did to Lieberman. Nobody ever learns.

Redux 05-02-2009 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562093)
Because it is about his desire to hang on to power and not losing his job. And for no other reason.

Maybe he learned that from Richard Shelby, the Senator from Alabama who switched from D to R in the 90s for fear of losing his reelection.

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redux (Post 562123)
Maybe he learned that from Richard Shelby, the Senator from Alabama who switched from D to R in the 90s for fear of losing his reelection.

Maybe he just took a page from his own history instead:

Quote:

After graduating from Yale Law School, Specter opened a law practice, Specter & Katz, with Marvin Katz, who is now a Federal District Court Judge in Philadelphia. Specter became an assistant district attorney under District Attorney James Crumlish, and was a Democrat.

In 1965, Specter ran for District Attorney, on the Republican ticket as a registered Democrat. He handily beat incumbent Jim Crumlish, and subsequently changed his registration to Republican.
It is all about him wanting to stay in the Senate and keep the power in his hands.

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 562101)
The Club for "Growth" ran an unelectable candidate against him in the primary.

The party pushed him out and said good riddance and did a little dance afterwards.

It's exactly what the Ds did to Lieberman. Nobody ever learns.

It would have been more interesting if he had just become an Independent. Then he could truely say no one owned him and he owed no one. But of course he would never be bank rolled in a re-elections like the Dems can do for him.

TGRR 05-02-2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562190)
Maybe he just took a page from his own history instead:



It is all about him wanting to stay in the Senate and keep the power in his hands.

Okay.

And now you're down a senator. If Franken makes it, you can't even filibuster. Obama can appoint anyone he likes.

But you've established ideological purity. Congratulations.

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 562209)
Okay.

And now you're down a senator. If Franken makes it, you can't even filibuster. Obama can appoint anyone he likes.

But you've established ideological purity. Congratulations.

WTF are you talking about. I'm not down shit. The Republickins are down one the Demoncrats are up one. :lol2:

TGRR 05-02-2009 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562210)
WTF are you talking about. I'm not down shit. The Republickins are down one the Demoncrats are up one. :lol2:

Of course. Because you're "independent". :lol:

Even though you spend all your time defending Bush and his policies.

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 562214)
Of course. Because you're "independent". :lol:

Even though you spend all your time defending Bush and his policies.

Who said I was "independent"?

TGRR 05-02-2009 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562215)
Who said I was "independent"?

You did. Or tried to.

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 562226)
You did. Or tried to.

Where? Link it.

TGRR 05-02-2009 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562228)
Where? Link it.

Naw, I'm not going digging.

Instead, I'll just ask you...you say you aren't a republican, I seriously doubt you're a dem...and now you aren't an independent. What are you?

xoxoxoBruce 05-02-2009 01:39 PM

Your deepest secret fear. ;)

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 562232)
Naw, I'm not going digging.

Instead, I'll just ask you...you say you aren't a republican, I seriously doubt you're a dem...and now you aren't an independent. What are you?

None of your fucking business, but it is fun watching you dig yourself a hole as you try to figure me out. Have fun!

TGRR 05-02-2009 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562234)
None of your fucking business, but it is fun watching you dig yourself a hole as you try to figure me out. Have fun!

It's okay if you're afraid to state your beliefs. Most of the sissies are.

TGRR,
Would rather just laugh at your weak ass.

TGRR 05-02-2009 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 562233)
Your deepest secret fear. ;)

What? An internet "conservative" that hasn't got the courage of his convictions?

Boo, scary, kids!

:3eye:

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 562239)
What? An internet "conservative" that hasn't got the courage of his convictions?

Boo, scary, kids!

:3eye:

You never said anything about conservative. I am conservative on some issues. You said Republickin a few times, you said Independent this last time, and as usual you are talking out of your ass making assumptions about people. You have no idea WTF you are talking about. Again. :lol2:

TGRR 05-02-2009 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562240)
You never said anything about conservative. I am conservative on some issues. You said Republickin a few times, you said Independent this last time, and as usual you are talking out of your ass making assumptions about people. You have no idea WTF you are talking about. Again. :lol2:

And you're too afraid to say it, Nancy. :3eye:

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 02:48 PM

I am absolutely crushed. :rotflol: :moon:

TGRR 05-02-2009 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562263)
I am absolutely crushed. :rotflol: :moon:


Who cares? I only give a damn about vertebrates.

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 562266)
Who cares?

You. It must piss you off when people don't do what you want them to do. :D

TGRR 05-02-2009 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562269)
You. It must piss you off when people don't do what you want them to do. :D

Why do you lie so much, Mercenary? Were you raised wrong?

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 562270)
Why do you lie so much, Mercenary? Were you raised wrong?

Are you tw's twin?:p

TGRR 05-02-2009 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562272)
Are you tw's twin?:p

Are you an idiot?

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 562281)
Are you an idiot?

You win! I will put you on my special Christmas List. See ya. Ignored.

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 03:12 PM

Quote:

Top 10 Al Franken Quotes
02/26/2007


Ranked by HUMAN EVENTS Assistant Editor Amanda B. Carpenter

Liberal humorist and former Air America radio host Al Franken recently announced his candidacy for the Minnesota Democratic Senate nomination to challenge Republican Sen. Norm Coleman. His comments show him to be a proud representative of the hard-working, leftist wing of his base inspired by the likes of Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan and most recently, anti-Catholic hyper-blogger Amanda Marcotte.

10. I'm Al Franken. I hate you, and you hate me.



-- How Franken said he introduced himself to Karl Rove, Newsweek, March 29, 2004

9. I'm a bit of a shill for the Clinton Administration, which has its perks. I’m invited to all the inaugural balls.

-- Buffalo News, April 7, 1998

8. When I was first asked to speak at Hartford State Technical College, I jumped at the opportunity. Because, you see, I thought I had been asked to speak at Harvard, which would have been quite an honor. But instead, I am here with you, the nation’s future air conditioner repairmen.

-- Excerpt from the commencement address he gave to a technical college, Oh the Things I Know!, pp. 6-7

7. Making jokes about Terri Schiavo is one of the hardest things I've had to do as a humorist.

-- The Truth (With Jokes) p. 159

6. Nobody likes getting an abortion. Except, perhaps, rape victims.

-- The Truth (With Jokes) p. 124

5. If I put myself on the ballot and even 50 people voted for me, it'd be a travesty.

-- Interview with the Oregonian, Feb. 22, 1999

4. During Vietnam, I was in college, enjoying my student deferment. The government wisely felt that, in my case, military service was less important than completing my studies to prepare me for my chosen career: comedian.

-- The Truth (With Jokes), p. 97

3. I'm neutral in this race but I'm for freedom of speech, which means people should be able to assemble and speak without being shouted down.

-- After tackling heckler at DNC Event where Howard Dean was speaking, New York Post, Jan. 27, 2004

2. Minnesota Republican Norman Coleman is one of the administration's leading butt boys.

-- The Truth (With Jokes) p. 262

1. Republicans are shameless d**ks. No, that’s not fair. Republican politicians are shameless d**ks.

-- The Truth (With Jokes) p. 58
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=19560

TheMercenary 05-02-2009 03:15 PM

TGRR! I found your pillow!

http://homedecor.cafepress.com/al-franken-quote_pillows

TGRR 05-02-2009 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562282)
You win! I will put you on my special Christmas List. See ya. Ignored.

Is that all it took? :biglaugha

TGRR,
Should have done this weeks ago.

TGRR 05-02-2009 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562285)

So much for you ignoring me. :lol:

slang 05-03-2009 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolf (Post 561179)
At least he's now properly labelled.


And speaking of rinos, might Senator McCain join in on this change action? One can only hope.

classicman 05-04-2009 10:58 PM

Quote:

Sen. Arlen Specter went on CBS News' "Face The Nation" with Bob Schieffer on Sunday to discuss his recent switch to the Democratic Party.

Asked whether he believed that he had let people down by changing parties, Specter said issues like Republican attitudes towards cancer research had made him unhappy with the party. Specter went on to suggest that if Republicans had been more aggressive about cancer research, GOP luminary Jack Kemp would be alive today. The former GOP Congressman and vice-presidential nominee died over the weekend, at age 73, from cancer.
What an asshole. That is just plain wrong. He switched parties to stay in power - plain & simple.

TGRR 05-04-2009 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 562873)
What an asshole. That is just plain wrong. He switched parties to stay in power - plain & simple.

So what? It's not like he's the first one to do it.

classicman 05-06-2009 01:43 PM

Ahhh, Karma ...

Quote:

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The Democratic leader in the Senate promised Sen. Arlen Specter he would retain his seniority when he jumped from the Republican to the Democratic party, Specter told CNN Wednesday, but faced "pushback" from other Democratic senators.

On Tuesday the Senate confirmed that Specter had lost his seniority in a resolution that set out committee assignments for the entire Senate. The resolution was approved on a unanimous voice vote.

The full Senate voted Tuesday to strip Specter of his seniority, dropping him to the bottom of the pile on every committee he sits on.

The action came on a resolution — passed on a unanimous voice vote — that set out committee assignments for the entire Senate.

classicman 05-06-2009 01:52 PM

Ohhh I just found Spectors reply...

Quote:

“Senator Reid assured me that I would keep my committee assignments and that I would have the same seniority as if I had been elected as a Democrat in 1980. It was understood that the issue of subcommittee chairmanships would not be decided until after the 2010 election. Some members of the caucus have raised concerns about my seniority, so the caucus will vote on my seniority at the same time subcommittee chairmanships are confirmed after the 2010 election. I am confident my seniority will be maintained under the arrangement I worked out with Senator Reid. I am eager to continue my work with my colleagues on the various committees on which I serve and will continue to be a staunch and effective advocate for Pennsylvania’s and the Nation’s priorities.”
Uh, nope - apparently his colleagues choose not to give it to him.
Oh well. Guess thats the price he'll have to pay for the switch.

TheMercenary 05-06-2009 02:52 PM

That is a frigging hoot.

sugarpop 05-06-2009 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 562093)
Because it is about his desire to hang on to power and not losing his job. And for no other reason.

Can you name ONE politician for which it isn't about that?

sugarpop 05-06-2009 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 562209)
Okay.

And now you're down a senator. If Franken makes it, you can't even filibuster. Obama can appoint anyone he likes.

But you've established ideological purity. Congratulations.

That is assuming all democrats will vote accordingly, and they have proven they won't. The bluedog democrats are siding with republicans.

Personally, I hope a couple of progressive (NOT moderate) democrats decide to challenge him, if he doesn't support at least the main things Obama wants passed, like health care and energy.

sugarpop 05-06-2009 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 563284)
Ohhh I just found Spectors reply...



Uh, nope - apparently his colleagues choose not to give it to him.
Oh well. Guess thats the price he'll have to pay for the switch.

Was it because he has voted against things he probably shouldn't have? I remember hearing about this, but I don't remember why they voted him out. :scratching head:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.