|  | 
| 
 Mother of all Meltdowns Martin Wolf cites Nouriel Roubini, of New York University’s Stern School of Business, predictions for the mother of all economic meltdowns. Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Well this alchy has been reading about the big one for a long time so I'm not overly concerned. Of course I can easily ramp up food production and get an extra couple boxes of ammo...:cool: | 
| 
 This all seems perfectly believable to me.  Griff - Buy more than a few boxes of ammo. Buy a reloader and stockpile components. If something like this does happen even if you personally are protected the masses of affected people will be difficult to repel. It's seriously difficult to imagine what this meltdown would look like in real life. Maybe something like after the 1929 crash? Twenty percent of people wandering around looking for work that isn't there? As much as I'd like to believe that the situation is going to somehow get better, gut feeling says otherwise. | 
| 
 what have I said?  Barack, the Anti-Christ, will win and that'll be the start; he'll be in office until 12-21-2012 and then: BAM! end of the world.com I hope being a non-Christian won't piss off God. *sighs* | 
| 
 Hey? Hey? i think it might be the big MELTDOWN? Its been coming for a long long time. Anyway? ever thought of this? How are they going to give the baby boomers their retirement? All that money in their 401k's has already been spent. In theory?Hasnt it? I have been waiting for this since 1996. Obama? the antichrist? could be? It is an interesting time to be alive, just hang onto your hat! cindy | 
| 
 When apples are popular, sell apples; when pessimism is popular, sell doom. Quote: 
 The last round of economists predicting doom happened after Enron and the Andersen accounting scandals. Those predictions were followed by a boom. Go figure. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 thanks D and B! | 
| 
 Fuck that...I'm selling pomegranates...they're the next big thing. | 
| 
 gd speculator | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 breif me on it? Hey breif me in on the digital tv conspiracy? There HAS got to be one? ARE you kidding? Hey i waited for the Y2k? I had 24 cans of beef stew, 32 cans of corned beef hash, a generator, batteries even make-up( i'm a female) I was ready. I even had a few gallons of vodka, thinking it would be worth it's weight in gold. The ONLY thing that happened was this: My Y2k  novelty HAT, Beeped off two hours early? gees. There you have it. I ate beef stew in a can for years! cindy:eek: | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Sound advice Merc. | 
| 
 Merc, you kind of nailed my thoughts on it. I'm mildly curious about the impending recession, but more to guide my investing than out of any sense of dread.  My wife and I lived cheaply, saved everything, have no debt, and are in a pretty good position to buy stock and property when the prices tumble. To achieve this, we had to bite our tongues and smile when friends showed off their new cars, their houses bought with irresponsible credit, had to turn down invitations to go out to sushi, expensive vacations, etc. This beautiful system of free market capitalism, in the long run, rewards rational behavior and delayed gratification. It punishes, severely, those who through greed or ignorance make ill-consider choices for immediate reward, without considering the long-term consequences. | 
| 
 i've said it before and i'll say it again.  the wealthiest client i have is a retired letter carrier that lived well but responsibly, he invested early and often in whatever amount he could. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 But, without those people how would the rest of the system function? If nobody is buying the economy won't be growing. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 I didn't know Obama was the anti-christ.  I thought he was just black. I have to say my catholic upbringing makes me shudder every time I see the word anti-christ (there I go again) even though I know it's not rational. | 
| 
 I thought the father of all meltdowns occured when Bush and the Republican party realized that the Democrats in Congress, at least House Democrats, are no longer dough to be kneaded in regards to FISA. I bet the result will be Warren Buffet buying up the choicest of loans from mortgage companies. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 A previous discussion identified how economies grow verses how they self destruct. We can make more jobs by employing more people in the factory. So we hire more security guards. That increases cash flow (what bean counters confuse as growth). Or we do same factory output with fewer workers every year. Latter results in more jobs in the economy, a wealthier nation, higher standards of living, poverty reduction, etc. Yes, some still don't get it. By doing the same job with fewer employees every year, then the economy creates more (and more productive) jobs. Buying more is what bean counters advocate when they "throw money at problems like a grenade". That was a most piercing fact from Ross Perot. Throwing money at something does not solve problems and does not create growth. Worse, throwing money at something only results in economic revenge years later such as inflation, stagflation, lower standards of living, job losses, greater foreign debt, dollar 'downsizing', the selling of America to foreigners, etc. Solution to growth is not found in 'more junk'. Solution is in getting most value from every dollar. How do you measure value? Well, bean counters assume every dollar is same as value. Therefore bean counters insist that more consumption is always good. If true, then we could require all homeowners to replace their lawns every other year. According to bean counters, that would create more economic growth. Sometimes consumption is good; sometimes it is bad. How do we determine which? We use something that cannot be measured on any spread sheet - value. And what creates more value? Innovation. What do bean counters not measure? Innovation. So how do they measure growth? Many confuse cash flow with growth when they cannot even measure or just ignore value. Those who understand these concepts also immediately grasp what Warren Buffet said so many years ago. The only real tax cut is one that includes spending cuts. Instead we increased spending. That is no different than 'throwing money like a grenade'. We now see the resulting mess created this time in financial institutions that used all that money to enrich themselves with money games - especially sub-prime loans. As these wealthier got richer on money games, the average American has seen his income (adjusted for inflation) diminish every year for the past seven years. But how can this be if cash flow has increased so much in America? Well what have we been buying? More yachts? More Jaguars? Rather curious that those who have been most critical of this 'growth' are some of America's richest men who are also known for being responsible rather than money greedy. Did you hear them or did you hear the economics promoted by wacko extremists through their mouthpieces (ie Rush Limbaugh)? | 
| 
 Quote: 
 http://blog.sweetestmemories.com/pix/damian.jpg | 
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 PM. | 
	Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.