Masturbation & Sick Days
 

Well?

A whole day?!

Quit yer bragging.

Wasn't expecting this:rolleyes:

So wait... are you talking about taking a sick day to masturbate? Or taking a masturbation-related sick day? Like an injury.

Either way, I'm down.

Surely you meant "masturbation and slick days".

Clone threads are really taking off lately. . . . You're welcome.

....lo, and then ensueth a vast whoosh of posts espousing and decrying the clone thread as it doth impact the overall quality and readability of Ye Ole Cellar by those of strong opinion and great verbosity.

Teh Flint doth giveth and Teh Flint doth taketh away.

This is my first.

And it was a good one.

masturbation makes you feel sick? why you poor thing. yes, I definately think you need to take a sick day. or two.

A sick day to masturbate you are sick.

I still think they're fucking stupid. I try not to post in them. (Sometimes it's hard, though.)

Having said that... well.... Nothingland is Nothingland.

You mean you stay home to masturbate? What's wrong with at work?

Nothing at all.

For my birthday, my boss dry humped my leg....I then wanted to go home sick, but he wouldnt let me.

I threw Pavlova at him, which was a criminal waste of pav, but I think it was worth it.

Depends ... did you get him? You'd hate to miss and waste the pav.

Okay who wants to explain Pavlova to the foreigners?

When I first started, I was an apprentice bater. Now that I'm a Master Bater, I just whack off all day. I take a sick day to get a break from masturbating.

Lurve pavlova

You know, I really wish pavlova had not been mentioned in this thread about masturbation.
These two things should be kept .... separate.

Dana, the phrase "lurve pavlova" is just sooooo dangerous. Sounds like a euphemism for something very eeiiuuuwww.

lol well I suppose it does at that...

allow me to qualify that statement:

I lurve pavlova!

I used to ;) Back when I had a libido... and a job...

I thought Pavlova was ubiquitous. But as it hasn't made its way to Texas yet - it's a meringue based dessert (hard meringue, soft in the middle) topped with cream and fresh fruit - usually strawberries, but I've seen different toppings. It was named after a ballet dancer, but I can't remember her first name (Anna?)

When I was on a training course a couple of years ago, the trainer digressed into explaining Pavlovian response by telling us about the scientist Pavlova and his dogs. I sat there checking the other women's faces, ready to crack up if anyone gave even a sign of spotting the mistake. Nope. Sigh.

Many things do not make it to Texas, and many things do not make it out either

Oh, I GOT him good. He was on the phone, so trapped. I flicked the spoon and it went from his glasses down to his crotch :)

Payback shall be a bitch

Too muchth lithping.

Oi! Thay it, don't thpray it!!

Particularly appropriate in the context of this thread. :jagoff:

Are men turned on my coming on a woman's face because they've seen it so many times in porn films/ pictures - where it is used because it makes the orgasm visual - or is it used in porn because it is a typical male fantasy?

The amount of male friends who've told me (in their cups admittedly) that it's an unfulfilled ambition makes me wonder. I can't say I particularly enjoy it, but I wouldn't refuse the pleasure to someone I was willing to have sex with - which is a little more intimate after all!

I was told it would make you go blind. Thank goodness for braille.:p

Imagine if every time you had an orgasm, at the very peak of it this "stuff" appeared. Wouldn't it have some sort of otherworldly quality to it, like it was magic. You'd totally associate it with every orgasm you ever had, including your deepest formative years and ever since. Maybe it was even scary when it first showed up, unexpected -- or maybe it was guilty evidence, like you had to hide it because if you didn't, everybody would know what you were doing.

And then, find out that some women act like they're scared of it, like it was battery acid or something. But others would embrace it as a part of the act. Imagine how that might be weirdly fulfilling or amazing somehow, that the woman was saying this "stuff" was not foul, or toxic, or guilty, or messy, but that it came from your orgasm and they actually wanted it and that was the goal to begin with.

Then add on layers of visual stimulation, because men's sexuality is so utterly visual.


TMI?

I think the idea of men cumming on womens faces is all about the power aspect. It's part of the games we all involve ourselves in when we have sex. The ultimate power struggle!

Oh yeah, and then there's the meaningful, sharing and caring undying love kind of sex, but seriously, who has that after the sixth month of a relationship anyway? ;)

On the contrary I think you just gave the most amazing insight. I had never considered it in that light. It makes sense.

I do think ali's power theory also has some weight though. But I suspect that your explanation underlies it even if the power aspect is present.

If a woman ejaculates on me during oral, is she dominating me?

Difficult to include the visual (and therefore visual possession) element without creative use of either mirrors or yoga, so I'm guessing not:P

Maybe. I think it works both ways really. I don't think it matters who's doing the tongue work and who's doing the writhing around.

Yeah, that's maybe part of it -- sex is at once utterly selfish and utterly giving, isn't it? You can give the utter pleasure to your mate, but you can't share the orgasm, and vice-versa. So it's utterly dominating and utterly submissive, all the time. But not a bad kind of domination/submission...

The bits you don't share with your partner become your partner's fantasy. I remember a real-life story where a guy fell in love with a woman who was OCD about counting - you know how some people get hung up on numbers? I don't remember the exact details, but the woman was a serial counter, who would count her steps to the bus station every day, count the bricks on the wall, form relationships with numbers. One day the guy figured out that, every time she gave him a handjob, she gave him 22 strokes with the right hand, and then 22 strokes with the left hand, etc. For months it went on like that.

And what became his fantasy... what drove him utterly crazy... was the dream... the hope... the longing... that one day she would go 23 on him.

lol...so I have to ask the question. At the end of 44 strokes did he always cum on cue? If so, maybe that was the problem.

No, she'd just go 22 one hand, 22 the other until it was effective.

ok, so if she went 22, 22 and then he came on 15, would she keep going to 22 anyway?

of course she would. the question is......did she 'have' to go to the left hand if he came on the right?

why would she have her hand in the way? Wouldn't she let him cum on her face?

Somewhat tangentially, I think the "pearl necklace" is cute, and it's not too likely to get any up her nose, which seems right for a couple of reasons.

UT is quite right -- it's both selfish and un-.

I love pavalova.

:blush: