The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Andrew Wakefield found to have faked research on vaccines/autism. Murder? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=19564)

TGRR 02-17-2009 08:30 PM

Andrew Wakefield found to have faked research on vaccines/autism. Murder?
 
You know those annoying crazes and hysterias populations go through? Like the measles vaccination/autism scare? Well, it turns out that the World's Biggest Scumbag, Andrew Wakefield, has basically brought measles back from the realm of depression-baby scare stories, single-handedly, for a little personal fame.

Quote:

THE doctor who sparked the scare over the safety of the MMR vaccine for children changed and misreported results in his research, creating the appearance of a possible link with autism, a Sunday Times investigation has found.

Confidential medical documents and interviews with witnesses have established that Andrew Wakefield manipulated patients’ data, which triggered fears that the MMR triple vaccine to protect against measles, mumps and rubella was linked to the condition.

The research was published in February 1998 in an article in The Lancet medical journal. It claimed that the families of eight out of 12 children attending a routine clinic at the hospital had blamed MMR for their autism, and said that problems came on within days of the jab. The team also claimed to have discovered a new inflammatory bowel disease underlying the children’s conditions.

The results of "Doctor" Wakefield's precious little shennanigans?

Quote:

Despite involving just a dozen children, the 1998 paper’s impact was extraordinary. After its publication, rates of inoculation fell from 92% to below 80%. Populations acquire “herd immunity” from measles when more than 95% of people have been vaccinated.

Last week official figures showed that 1,348 confirmed cases of measles in England and Wales were reported last year, compared with 56 in 1998. Two children have died of the disease.
Hahaha stupid fucking humans.

So, anyway, I'd like to suggest that the British government haul Wakefield up on two counts of murder, 1290 cases of attempted murder, and one case of being a gigantic douchebag.

Am I out of line, here? I mean, his malicious acts led to two deaths and 1290 additional life-threatening situations, right? And this wasn't a MISTAKE in research, it was outright fraud.

EDIT: Forgot to add the link:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/lif...cle5683671.ece

xoxoxoBruce 02-17-2009 08:36 PM

Doesn't sound like he had any good intentions.:(

TheMercenary 02-17-2009 08:37 PM

Definate douchebag.

TGRR 02-17-2009 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 535756)
Definate douchebag.

Murderer?

classicman 02-17-2009 08:59 PM

Inject him with the measles.

TGRR 02-17-2009 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 535762)
Inject him with the measles.

Oh, something tells me HE'S had the vaccination. You know, before his horrific "discoveries".

footfootfoot 02-17-2009 10:02 PM

I'll take "Kick him in the cunt" for $500.

smoothmoniker 02-17-2009 10:48 PM

I have friends who have bought into this wholesale.

Sundae 02-18-2009 03:15 AM

There are people on this board who are anti-immunisation, MMR scare or not.

And I have heard many, many mothers on TV, in radio interviews and in person who swear blind that their children changed completely, the day after receiving the injection. And who claim that the Government pushing the GPs to use MMR as opposed to separate injections was along the lines of the Nazis experimenting with concentration camp prisoners.

He didn't really need to push people very hard.

Pie 02-18-2009 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 535760)
Murderer?

Yep.

tw 02-18-2009 05:09 PM

Saddam has WMDs. Nothing has changed. One can think logical or one can entertain emotions. Childhood leukemia created by electric wires? Same people easily deceived by Rush Limbaugh also believed that leukemia myth. It’s not hard to think logically. And yet so many so hate their computer as to plug it into a surge protector. So many automatically believe myths rather than first asking 'why'.

Pico and ME 02-18-2009 08:04 PM

Quote:

And yet so many so :question:hate:question: their computer as to plug it into a surge protector.
:unsure:

lumberjim 02-18-2009 08:27 PM

2 deaths from measels?

how many less from SIDS?

Beestie 02-18-2009 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 536015)
Saddam has WMDs.

I'm going to start calling you "the six degrees of WMDs."

No subject - no, make that no subject is more than six degrees from WMDs.

Not saying you are wrong, mind you, just saying.

classicman 02-18-2009 09:15 PM

Why? do I keep reading them.

TGRR 02-18-2009 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 536098)
2 deaths from measels?

how many less from SIDS?

Do you have a peer-reviewed study showing a link between MMR vaccinations and SIDS?

lumberjim 02-18-2009 09:41 PM

nope.

Pie 02-18-2009 09:53 PM

FUD. That's all he has.

TGRR 02-18-2009 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 536125)
nope.

I'm sure there's a point in there somewhere. I just appear to be too dense to appreciate it.

Enlighten me?

classicman 02-19-2009 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 536125)
nope.


tw 02-19-2009 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beestie (Post 536109)
I'm going to start calling you "the six degrees of WMDs."

Whenever a discussion is about people who don't think logically - who want to be scammed - then no better example is 'Saddam had WMDs'. The ideal example of people who just *know* despite facts.

An MMR myth could not happen to anyone who learned from the 'Saddam had WMD' lie. A lie always cited when people believe their emotions rather than reality. No better example of how many will deny facts to entertain emotional bias.

Cicero 02-19-2009 02:12 PM

I will take full responsibility for any of the myths I choose to beleve in.

classicman 02-19-2009 02:16 PM

bites tongue - move along

Sundae 02-19-2009 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cicero (Post 536371)
I will take full responsibility for any of the myths I choose to beleve in.

Like the American Government blew up the Twin Towers?

Aliantha 02-19-2009 04:33 PM

There was an article on the news last night about a town just north of Brisbane where I live which has a less than 66% immunisation rate and is soon to be considered dangerous for tourists (which is where the town makes its money from) because there's likely to be outbreaks of measles and whooping cough, both of which are making a comeback thanks to generally lower levels of immunisation in the community.

This is a dangerous game people are playing with their childrens lives.

ETA: Damn liberal pinko hippies!

Flint 02-19-2009 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smoothmoniker (Post 535807)
I have friends who have bought into this wholesale.

Yeah, you're right in the middle of cuckoo-land. Your region is sending out emissaries to bamboozle the masses with this hogwash.

smoothmoniker 02-19-2009 05:13 PM

If you would quit watching their movies and TV shows and buying their albums, these wackjobs wouldn't have quite such a far reach.

Do it, do it for the children. Quit sending your entertainment dollars to LA. Send them directly to me instead, and I promise to entertain you.

Aliantha 02-19-2009 05:16 PM

I wonder if the people who choose not to immunise their children realise how much infant mortality has decreased since immunisation became mainstream.

Sorry, but this issue really bothers me because if diseases like measles and whooping cough, not to mention polio and hepatitis become 'ordinary' illnesses again, where does that leave the babies who are only just begining their immunisation schedule? The very young and the very old are always most susceptible to these diseases and if they're more prevalent in society, then who is going to start popping off because of them?

If you choose not to immunise your child, you're not only being irresponsible as a parent, you're being socially irresponsible also.

Flame away.

Clodfobble 02-19-2009 05:28 PM

A friend of mine's baby got whooping cough a week before the scheduled immunization was to occur. She spent over a week in the hospital on a feeding tube. It is serious shit.

TheMercenary 02-19-2009 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha (Post 536472)
I wonder if the people who choose not to immunise their children realise how much infant mortality has decreased since immunisation became mainstream.

Sorry, but this issue really bothers me because if diseases like measles and whooping cough, not to mention polio and hepatitis become 'ordinary' illnesses again, where does that leave the babies who are only just begining their immunisation schedule? The very young and the very old are always most susceptible to these diseases and if they're more prevalent in society, then who is going to start popping off because of them?

If you choose not to immunise your child, you're not only being irresponsible as a parent, you're being socially irresponsible also.

Flame away.

What she said. If it is such a bad thing I think we need to stop trying to immunize all those Africans./sarc

jinx 03-16-2009 08:53 PM

From The Spectator

Quote:

The campaign against Wakefield in the Sunday Times has been led by journalist Brian Deer.

What the Sunday Times did not report was that the GMC investigation into Wakefield was triggered by a complaint from...Brian Deer, who furnished the allegations against him four years ago. He has thus been reporting upon the hearing into his own complaint. Since when has a reputable paper published a story by a reporter who is actually part of that story himself -- without saying so – and who uses information arising from the disciplinary hearing which he himself has instigated and which is investigating allegations he himself made in the first place?
Quote:

Wakefield has issued a detailed refutation of Deer’s allegations

jinx 03-17-2009 11:37 AM

Vaccines and Autism: The Unending Story (Newsweek)

Quote:

The first question for the court, then, was whether Bailey had Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis, and its answer was yes, based on medical records. It then addressed the question of whether the MMR vaccine can cause ADEM, and here there was precedent: Two previous vaccine cases, in 1994 and 2001, had led to decisions that ADEM can be caused by natural measles, mumps, and rubella infections, as well as by measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines. In Bailey’s case, the court ruled, the MMR had indeed caused his Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis.

For the final step, the court wrestled with whether Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis can cause pervasive developmental delay, and whether it caused Bailey’s. (Just to reiterate, the issue was PDD, not autism. As the court said in its decision, Bailey “more likely than not suffers from PDD, and not from autism.”) Here, the medical literature leaves plaintiffs much more room than does the literature on classical autism. The government argued against the claim that ADEM can cause pervasive developmental delay, of course, acknowledging “that Bailey currently suffers from PDD, and that the MMR vaccine can cause ADEM" but disputing "the biologic plausibility [of] whether ADEM can lead to PDD.”
...

The government agreed to a lump sum of $750,000, and an annuity that will provide as much as $70,000 to $100,000 a year for Bailey once his parents are not able to care for him.

jinx 03-17-2009 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JULIE GERBERDING, DR., CDC DIRECTOR
Well, you know, I don't have all the facts because I still haven't been able to review the case files myself. But my understanding is that the child has a -- what we think is a rare mitochondrial disorder. And children that have this disease, anything that stresses them creates a situation where their cells just can't make enough energy to keep their brains functioning normally. Now, we all know that vaccines can occasionally cause fevers in kids. So if a child was immunized, got a fever, had other complications from the vaccines. And if you're predisposed with the mitochondrial disorder, it can certainly set off some damage. Some of the symptoms can be symptoms that have characteristics of autism.

link

The director of the CDC hasn't been able to review the relevant case files (ie. Hannah Poling)... she must be busy with more important stuff... but still admits that vaccines can cause 'autism-like symptoms'

Clodfobble 03-17-2009 07:56 PM

Yes, but only insofar as the vaccine gave them an illness, and they were genetically predisposed to develop this life-altering condition in response to an illness somewhere along the line.

My friend's daughter has Type 1 diabetes. Genetically, she was a ticking time bomb. It was pretty much a guarantee that she was going to get it at some point. It happened that when she was four, she got hand-foot-and-mouth disease, a pretty typical disease as far as kids go, and it triggered the shutdown of her pancreas. But it's entirely possible that a vaccine when she was younger could have triggered it too. Would the vaccine have "caused" her diabetes in that case?

jinx 03-17-2009 08:03 PM

I don't know Clod.
I would think it ethical for the CDC/FDA to know the answer to that before mandating vaccines though...

TGRR 03-17-2009 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 546319)
I don't know Clod.
I would think it ethical for the CDC/FDA to know the answer to that before mandating vaccines though...

Mandating vaccines stopped epidemics that caused far more serious loss of life, disabilities, etc.

You want to stack up these alleged "vaccine victims" with, say, the number of people paralyzed with Polio since we started recording cases?

Or the number of people that died of smallpox vs the number of people who died from the vaccine (nobody denies the occasional fatality from the vaccine in that case)?

jinx 03-18-2009 09:37 AM

Wow, we went right from screaming MURDERER!! about a researcher who wanted some safety studies done on shit they want to inject into healthy children - to well yeah, they can fuck people up but still....

You don't think no longer shitting where we drink, throwing sewage and garbage into the streets, drinking from the same cup hanging off the water bucket, not bathing ever much less washing the hands, doctors not washing their hands... none of these things made a difference? It was all the vaccines? Antibiotics knocking out secondary infections... nothing?

The polio vaccine being successful means it's all good eh? Whatever comes down the pike is just awesome because no one ends up in an iron lung anymore. 36 injections before age 2 and more in the works because if a little is good, more is better right? Besides, the government would never let anything hurt us.

It amazes me though, the different reactions to "vaccines might cause harm to some people" vs. "you might get the flu".

TGRR 03-18-2009 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 546482)
Wow, we went right from screaming MURDERER!! about a researcher who wanted some safety studies done on shit they want to inject into healthy children - to well yeah, they can fuck people up but still....

Because only sick kids get polio or measles.

Or words to that effect.

Tiki 03-18-2009 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 546482)
Wow, we went right from screaming MURDERER!! about a researcher who wanted some safety studies done on shit they want to inject into healthy children - to well yeah, they can fuck people up but still....

You don't think no longer shitting where we drink, throwing sewage and garbage into the streets, drinking from the same cup hanging off the water bucket, not bathing ever much less washing the hands, doctors not washing their hands... none of these things made a difference? It was all the vaccines? Antibiotics knocking out secondary infections... nothing?

The polio vaccine being successful means it's all good eh? Whatever comes down the pike is just awesome because no one ends up in an iron lung anymore. 36 injections before age 2 and more in the works because if a little is good, more is better right? Besides, the government would never let anything hurt us.

It amazes me though, the different reactions to "vaccines might cause harm to some people" vs. "you might get the flu".

Do you understand the differences in prevention and treatment between bacterial and viral infections?

Clodfobble 03-19-2009 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx
about a researcher who wanted some safety studies done

But there's a difference between doing safety studies even if they're unpopular, and faking the results of those studies.

jinx 03-19-2009 12:57 PM

A journalist said he faked the results of his study (not a safety study) - none of the other co-authors have said he did or it wouldn't have taken a journalist and 11 years to raise the alarm.... I'll wait for more info before jumping on the MURDER!! bandwagon myself.

Flint 03-19-2009 01:22 PM

Thx for representin' teh cuckoo bandwagon, tho. We can't have our fist-shaking threads too insular.

Flint 03-20-2009 09:05 AM

jinx . . . I just called you a cuckoo

jinx 03-20-2009 09:26 AM

I know and I'm planning to kill myself in a few minutes because I am so hurt by your callousness. I hope you're happy now.

Flint 03-20-2009 09:30 AM

Right after you kill yourself, do you mind if I have sex with your body while it's still warm?

jinx 03-20-2009 09:42 AM

No but you can hump my leg.

Flint 03-20-2009 09:44 AM

I think we have a deal.

TheMercenary 03-20-2009 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 547248)
Right after you kill yourself, do you mind if I have sex with your body while it's still warm?

My GOD you are sooo insensitve.

DanaC 03-20-2009 11:11 AM

You insensitive bastard! I lost my still warm body on 9/11.

TheMercenary 03-20-2009 11:27 AM

Yea, well I lost my Virginity on 9/11 and I still never got it back. MIA!

lumberjim 03-20-2009 12:15 PM

I'm SO glad Flint is 1500 miles away from my house.

Flint 03-20-2009 02:34 PM

Don't say that, dude. We would totally party.

lumberjim 03-20-2009 02:59 PM

i know.....i was just playing the straight man for your little joke about fucking my wife's dead body.


BOY....it sounds a LOT worse when I say it

Flint 03-20-2009 03:03 PM

Should we expect people to have some kind of negative reaction to what I said?

TheMercenary 03-20-2009 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 547481)
Should we expect people to have some kind of negative reaction to what I said?

Don't count on it.

lumberjim 03-20-2009 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 547481)
Should we expect people to have some kind of negative reaction to what I said?

Actually, I think you've laid the groundwork well enough that you can pretty much get away with saying pretty much anything, and people won't think any less of you.

Flint 03-20-2009 03:26 PM

Then the time has come. For me to stand up in the middle of a church and say "GOD IS A NIGGER FAGGOT!"

Clodfobble 03-20-2009 03:52 PM

Only if you do it at the end of a song, and give a resounding "ba-dum-CHSSSSSH" on your kit after you say it.

Flint 03-20-2009 03:55 PM

I'm gonna swing a boom arm over, and, during the middle of a song, insert that statement in the form of soulful gospel-style background lyrics.

Do you think I could pass it off--have people assume they misheard me during the general noise of the whole band playing? Would they confront me?

TheMercenary 03-20-2009 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 547530)
I'm gonna swing a boom arm over, and, during the middle of a song, insert that statement in the form of soulful gospel-style background lyrics.

Do you think I could pass it off--have people assume they misheard me during the general noise of the whole band playing? Would they confront me?

If we are your only audience you have little to worry about.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.