SUPER JANET
 

IF YOU DIDN'T SEE THIS....YOU MISSED IT LIVE. BUT DON'T FRET:

This is the internet buddy, we don't mess around here.

http://cellar.org/2004/jjt.jpg

WHOA!
 

Wow, if that's a piercing..then OUCH!!! But, IMO, it's still kinda cool. ;)

Heh, and the looks on their faces is like, "Um..uh oh." :eek:

It looks like the sunburst thingy is a "jacket" being held in place by a barbell piercing, which makes it a lot less ouchy than if the sunburst was a nipple clamp.

(For the record I totally don't GET nipple piercings. What if you want to use them for something else later?)

In work today, all I was hearing about this was that it was intentional. Looking at the picture posted above, their expressions are ones that seem to show embarrasment and puzzlement. If it was intentional, their body language does not show it.


American television on sex: no boobies or naughty bits or making babies. American televison on violence:Sure, the more the better!

They are performers.

Their expressions are what they wish their expressions to be.

(I'm going for intentional.)

MY GOD!!! SHE'S A BORG!!!!

THANK YOU!! Plus, it's been noted by someone who was actually at the event, that SECONDS after it all happened, Justin covered her up and led her off of the stage. Plus, in the video shot of it, you can see that when the ripping happened and her breast came out, her left hand did this jerking motion towards the exposure like, "Oh shit!". Basically, I'm going to believe information from someone who was actually there rather than blindly going along with what everyone else is saying (or believing). fOf course, as I said in another post, people are going to believe what they want to believe, even if there is evidence to the contrary.


Preach on!!!! Ain't that the truth! (although I have NO problems whatsoever about the not making babies...I'm all for no procreational sex!!! ;) :D

Actually, I found it funny as all hell for the suckers that paid to see lingerie models play football in the Lingerie Bowl 2004 . I heard on AM radio this morning all these guys calling up saying how pissed they were that there was too much interviewing and not enough tits and ass playing...baahahahaha! Serves them right I say! :haha:

Yeah, anybody should have known that $19.95 was WAY to much to pay... I mean it's lingerie, so you already know there won't even be any nudity.

I mean, not that I considered buying it myself.

Uhhhh.... like what?


If the tearing off of the tear-away bra was a mistake - what was it they intended to do?

::edited to resemble english::

Like their actual intended purpose? The scar tissue that results from the piercing (and sometimes multiple piercings) would appear likely to interfere with the milk channels.

Huh. I guess it could, but I know quite a few pierced successful breast feeders, and none who've encountered problems. Breast reduction surgery is the killer in that dept.

I think the exposure of the breast was the mistake, not the tearing away of the bra cup. You can see the there is a red piece of fabric under the black part of the outfit, and I *believe* that's what was supposed to stay on.

Look at the bra cup in his hand though, you can see that the red is just a trim along the top, and also see the snaps where it attaches/detaches.

Another suspect point here is this...how many pierced nipple folks do you know who routinely wear an ornament that large or elaborate unless they intend for it to be seen?

This was intentional. Anything to stir up attention, get publicity. CBS was in on it. They aren't stupid. They used to have the rep of being the old, stodgy network, and it has negatively impacted their viability in this modern, "X" age. They are actively working to change it, and you saw some of that yesterday.