![]() |
stickpoke
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do know of at least one reported rape in that environment. Usually, however, the male predators get away with it because of the above-described notion. |
Quote:
As to interpreting what you've posted, I have done so. I understand exactly what you're trying to suggest. You don't know anything about my personal life, so sorry you're wrong on that point. There was nothing personal about the point I was making. It was an academic response to a social issue. Refute the point and get back to me when you've developed a reasonable argument, otherwise just don't bother responding at all thanks. |
Quote:
Here..You said this: Quote:
"man walks around without a shirt on and is sexualised by a woman " A W O M A N!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Then I said: Quote:
Quote:
Grow up. |
bmw or GW ???
Quote:
|
lmao!
|
POST #117
Quote:
Quote:
Now do you understand the response? :eyebrow: |
Quote:
Another poster that CAN"T READ! READ THE STRING STUPID BEFORE YOU CHIME IN! Aliantha made the reference to the skirt in the context of her perceptions of a double standard, I was only making light of her description and she twisted it around to insult me. NOW YOU WANT TO DO THE SAME THING>>AH! |
Oh dear lord...
Aliantha mentions men going without shirts being sexualized by women, and women going without shirts being sexualized by men... Then BM starts babbling about going to Australia with a SKIRT on (wrong half of the anatomy) and gets all pissy when laughed at. |
I assure you BMW, that you're the one having difficulties with comprehension, but that's ok. It doesn't make any difference really. I was clear in my communication; everyone else can understand my point; you're the only one who's confused.
Anyway, as I said, when you've got something to add to the point, get back to me, otherwise, don't bother responding. :) Oh, and one more thing, I have not insulted you once other than to point out - in response to your own comment - that it seems you come from a family that doesn't value respectful communication. |
Putting the "stab" back in substance......Wait there was never a.........
|
Quote:
How am I having difficulties? You twisted my sentence to insult me and now want to stand by your insult. FU! Show me where I confused your statement that I wanted to be sexualized by men! It was quite clear I was responding to your statement regarding men wearing skirts and being sexualized by WOMEN. You purposely rework the response to insult me and I find it more insulting that you have the gall to sit there and continue to stand behind it. FU twice! As for the rest of the cheap shot jack-offs on this board. You want to insult me, fine, but don't cry foul when I throw an insult back at you. Thats what a double standard is. I also want to thank all those copy editors who find it within themselves to correct my grammar and spelling. Skirts shirts, my eye sight ain't what it used to be. Be that as it may I don't think it changes the point enough so that it can't be understood, typo's, and grammar snafus in all. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Skirts, Shirts..whatever? Aliantha never made any statement regarding men wearing skirts. YOU DID. HUGE difference there bud. The point being that MEN that go without their shirts are macho and hot, which is OK, but WOMEN that go without their shirts (IE: TOPLESS you nincompoop) are sluts and asking for sex which is NOT OK. Skirts or pants are completely irrelevant. But you are unable to admit you made a mistake so you're sticking with your erroneous babble and adding insult to injury by flinging some verbal abuse about. How pathetic. Stormie |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.