The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Immigration Enforcement Un-American? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=19841)

TheMercenary 03-25-2009 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 (Post 549329)
..because of subconcious prejudice.

How do you substantiate that this exists?

classicman 03-25-2009 02:01 PM

ok, I think I got you, so what you are saying is that because a person has subconscious thoughts, then they may be a racist or be predisposed to racist tendencies.

piercehawkeye45 03-25-2009 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 549334)
How do you substantiate that this exists?

I already told you my two reasons and that it is impossible to prove or disprove since they are personal.

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman
ok, I think I got you, so what you are saying is that because a person has subconscious thoughts, then they may be a racist or be predisposed to racist tendencies.

I would just stick with racial tendencies because throwing in racist is an entire discussion altogether. But yes, if a person has subconcious racist thoughts, they may be predisposed to racist tendencies without knowing it. That is why I argue it is impossible to seperate race from immigration issues because we are constantly judging immigration groups based on race.

xoxoxoBruce 03-25-2009 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 (Post 549329)
What are you talking about? What is my issue?

My entire point is that you cannot completely seperate race and immigration because of subconcious prejudice.

When approaching, or are being approached by, a person, I note size, sex, hair, dress, color, body language, etc.

If I know them, I immediately search my memory for previous behavior by that person... friend or foe, like or dislike, etc.

In the case of a stranger I search my memory for previous experiences with people with similar appearance.
Bigger would be more of a threat than smaller, male would be more of a threat than female(except in court),
someone in rags would be more of a threat than in a suit, and so on.

Of course there's no guarantee the well dressed little woman won't kill me, but I have to make a judgment on past experience.
I suppose second hand experience via the media or stories from peers would be in my database too.
I guess you're calling that prejudice, but I have to rely on what I've got.

piercehawkeye45 03-25-2009 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 549371)
I guess you're calling that prejudice, but I have to rely on what I've got.

You turned this into justification for prejudice, which I purposedly avoided. Prejudice is natural and unavoidable and but it does exist and it does becomes greater when we are born into a society with preexisting seperations and prejudices.

If you are attacked by a homeless person with green eyes you will probably avoid the homeless while not avoiding someone with green eyes because you grew up in a society where class seperation and prejudices exist but not eye color seperation and prejudice. So, since we grew up in a society where racial seperation and prejudice exist, we will most likely stereotype racial groups, which effect our perception and "liking" towards them.

I am saying in this from an observational standpoint and remember my intial claim is that we cannot completely seperate racial and immigration issues because of subconcious prejudices. I am not adding morality into here and I am not saying prejudice is justified or not.

xoxoxoBruce 03-25-2009 03:18 PM

Not a justification, a reality.
How could I know the person attacking me was homeless? I can't, but I can know they had green eyes, and any other things I can personally see. There is no way I can know a strangers socio-economic, educational, or religious background, I can only go by appearance in one on one situations.

Sure, if you grow up in the city you'll likely be wary of wild animals, from what other people have said, until you have a chance to have your own experiences and form your own opinion.
But that wouldn't necessarily keep you from contributing to wildlife support organizations, because as a human being you have the intellectual capacity to reason wild animals are not bad.

My intellectual capacity tells me that immigrants are not bad, but people that enter this country illegally are criminals and should be removed, not supported.

piercehawkeye45 03-25-2009 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 549376)
Not a justification, a reality.

We both agree its a reality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoxBruce
My intellectual capacity tells me that immigrants are not bad, but people that enter this country illegally are criminals and should be removed, not supported.

I don't disagree with this but unless you are going off on your own tangent, this was not my point. I was responding to this quote...

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout124
The reality is our current immigration issues have absolutely nothing to do with racial extermination.

which I disagreed with for the reason I have given above.

lookout123 03-25-2009 05:58 PM

Which comes straight out of a freshman level sociology class.

piercehawkeye45 03-25-2009 06:13 PM

Which has anything to do with the argument how?

But then again, the idea that crime is correlated to poverty is straight out of a freshman level sociology class. Being in the lower class must just be a result of being immoral then...

Happy Monkey 03-25-2009 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123 (Post 549400)
Which comes straight out of a freshman level sociology class.

Isn't "freshman level ... class" another way of saying "basically true, though there are complications you'll get to later"? Which is pretty much the way generalizations are supposed to work?

Bullitt 03-25-2009 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 (Post 549402)
Which has anything to do with the argument how?

But then again, the idea that crime is correlated to poverty is straight out of a freshman level sociology class. Being in the lower class must just be a result of being immoral then...

And increased ice cream sales means more shark attacks! Oh wait, that's just Summer.

TheMercenary 03-25-2009 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 549405)
Isn't "freshman level ... class" another way of saying "basically true, though there are complications you'll get to later"? Which is pretty much the way generalizations are supposed to work?

To which I may add, get back to us in 20 years and let us know if your assumptions have altered.

lookout123 03-25-2009 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 549405)
Isn't "freshman level ... class" another way of saying "basically true, though there are complications you'll get to later"? Which is pretty much the way generalizations are supposed to work?

If it were math or a real science... sure. In this case it is a bunch of people sitting around talking about why life is unfair.

xoxoxoBruce 03-26-2009 02:14 AM

Meanwhile, I present without prejudice, Mexico. pfd

slang 03-26-2009 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 549371)
female(except in court),


:biggrin:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.