The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   The Obamanation (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=19310)

xoxoxoBruce 05-30-2009 04:23 AM

Well that sucks. :mad:

TheMercenary 06-01-2009 06:06 PM

GM just gave some 20k workers a notice their plants will be closed for an undetermined time. Meanwhile, Obama went on an expensive date...

$24,000 tax payer dollars?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-000-bill.html

classicman 06-01-2009 06:16 PM

Get off it Merc - Bush was gone physically more than anyone and mentally absent for the last few years, it seems. Obama can go on a 1.3 million dollar date with his wife if he wants. He made her a promise and he kept it. Thats a frickin drop in the bucket, relatively speaking.

TheMercenary 06-01-2009 06:30 PM

It's about image when people are out of work, losing jobs, losing homes, with no sight of relief on the horizon. When Bush was president people weren't losing jobs and the economy was not tanking. And that is not a statement in support of Bush. It is all about how it looks in the eye of the public. He should just lay low on that stuff.

ZenGum 06-01-2009 06:42 PM

I see no problem with the date, but... three planes?

One of the planes was to cary "aides" and another for "reporters". The latter was totally redundant - I've never been to New York, but I guess they have reporters there already.
If the "aides" were really that crucial (I'm thinking of body guards, communication officers, the guy carrying the "football" - the briefcase that has the Big Red Button in it) then they should have been on the same plane as the prez.

Happy Monkey 06-01-2009 10:49 PM

It costs at least $24000 for him to anything. As a DC resident, I appreciate any time the President takes a helicopter instead of a limo. There are enough VIPs blockading traffic in the city as it is.

xoxoxoBruce 06-02-2009 12:48 AM

And don't forget about the carbon footprint the trip left. Why they probably detoured to Greenland and clubbed some baby seals, too. :rolleyes:

capnhowdy 06-02-2009 07:24 AM

CBS news just reported (a few mins ago) that their estimate for the date, excluding security, was around $81,000.00.
I reckon they were celebrating the appointment of a 31 year old person to "fix" the General Motors company.

classicman 06-02-2009 09:47 AM

Quote:

Remember, joyriding Air Force One around for a few hours over Manhattan a couple months ago cost $250,000, so the cost of the weekend trip was likely not likely that low.

With the White House simply refusing to say how much taxpayer money it spent,
How about that for selective transparency...

Quote:

Here's a helpful way to calculate the cost of the trip:

First, the First Couple (and entourage) flew from the White House to Andrews Air Force Base — three choppers (two decoys). That means dozens of men and women — radar, communications, mechanics, crews, everyone, perhaps 100, were involved. (A batch of tagalongs must've taken a taxpayer pool of vehicles out from the White House to AAFB, since it took three jets to get the gang to NYC).

Second, the president moving on a Saturday takes a full operation at and around the White House, dozens and dozens of people. Maybe they're all on salary, so that didn't likely cost much. But all the cops involved — D.C. police, uniformed Secret Service officers, Capitol police — were probably paid overtime, even double time. Probably, again, 100 personnel or so.

Then there were the jets — at least $24,000 for the three aircraft used to ferry the Obamas, aides and reporters to New York. The Obamas' jet, a Gulfstream 500, served as Air Force One.

Third, a C-17 had to fly to NYC to put in place a full motorcade (at least a dozen vehicles, maybe more). The military cargo plane may have taken up at least two, but maybe three, more choppers to fly the whole party from JFK to a Wall Street landing zone, where the motorcade was waiting. If not, the choppers flew there solo (White House veteran reporter Mark Knoller of CBS Radio wrote recently that "The VH-3D that serves as Marine One consumes about 1,200 pounds of fuel per hour." Ouch.

Fourth, driving through Manhattan is an expensive exercise. Dozens, perhaps hundreds, of NYPD have to be stationed all along the way, shutting down roads, holding back pedestrians. There were police cars involved, dozens of motorcycles, and the ever-present NYC ambulance (oh, don't forget that the White House doctor also probably went — with all his gear). The city likely gets reimbursed by the White House for the cost (they usually do). And they were all probably getting time and a half (the NYPD overtime budget is extraordinary).

Fifth, the United States Secret Service (USSS) had to scope out the whole thing, then station agents all over — sharpshooters, undercover agents, etc. — at a huge cost. Who knows if they were on overtime. And if you think they went up Saturday morning, think again. They were likely in NYC upwards of a week before, planning the whole evening, every second of every movement. They had to map out five movements — from JFK to the Wall Street LZ, then a motorcade to the restaurant, then another motorcade to the play, then a final motorcade back to the LZ, then a chopper flight to JFK, before the First Couple and crew jetted back to AAFB for another chopper to the White House.
A lot of things I hadn't thought about that would be included in the cost.

Happy Monkey 06-02-2009 05:32 PM

Right. It doesn't matter what he does, it's expensive. All of those costs are completely standard for Presidential trips. It's extremely petty to begrudge him a date, especially when Bush went to Camp David 149 times and Crawford 77 times in eight years.

classicman 06-02-2009 09:59 PM

I agree HM - This is nothing new, IIRC other past presidents also did their fair share. To criticize Obama on taking this is nothing more than petty. For Obama not to disclose the cost is just stupid though. I still can't figure that one out.

I did find it interesting how all the costs add up and that was the real point of my last post.

Shawnee123 06-03-2009 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 570331)
Right. It doesn't matter what he does, it's expensive. All of those costs are completely standard for Presidential trips. It's extremely petty to begrudge him a date, especially when Bush went to Camp David 149 times and Crawford 77 times in eight years.

Exactly. I'm so goddam sick of that crap I can't stand it already.

It's like bums crawling around in alleys looking for a scrap of food or a cigarette butt, because there's just nothing better around (in this case NOTHING BETTER TO BITCH ABOUT.)

classicman 06-03-2009 11:55 AM

but but but - wasn't it cool to see how much it costs for them to go out on a friggin date? Holy crap. Thats nuts. Could you imagine all the planning and coordination just to go to a show with your SO. What a PITA on top of everything else.

He is certainly entitled and this is another example of extremists making the entire party look bad. That whole broad brush....

Shawnee123 06-03-2009 11:59 AM

It's an example of a bunch of losers going "see? see? see?" They never point backwards.

No offense to you, classic. I'm glad it was brought up.

Really, it's ridiculous, but people run around like sheep going "BAH? Bah? Bah bah bah? Well, Bah!" Shocking. :cool:

glatt 06-03-2009 12:08 PM

I like the guy, but maybe he can just take the motorcade 5-6 blocks over to the Kennedy Center next time. They have world class shows there too, and a seat that's reserved for him.

tw 06-03-2009 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 570465)
but but but - wasn't it cool to see how much it costs for them to go out on a friggin date?

Just another example of what it costs when we decided to be the world's policeman. Costs must now increase because we have decided to impose democratic principles and Christian values on the world. Imposed as specifically stated in George Jr's "State of the Union" speech. Costs that increase when we invent myths (ie Saddam's WMDs) and then decide to impose our will (and myths) on others.

Nations that solve problems with military action rather than using negotiations must create and massively increase Fatherland Security. We could have been smarter. Instead we could have supported and concluded the Oslo Accords rather than subvert them. Or protected and used our massive popularity for rescuing Kuwait. Instead, we created even more enemies. Those costs are a microcosm of costs we incur when we unilaterally impose our extremist will rather than let the world chose to be more like us.

And then are the Rush Limbaugh, et al suggestions that all but encouraged the assassination of Obama. In reality, the greatest threats come from domestic wacko extremists encouraged to kill people in the name of their wacko politics or religion. These wackos even encourage to assassination of abortion doctors - and then openly praise it.

classicman 06-03-2009 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glatt (Post 570467)
maybe he can just take the motorcade 5-6 blocks over to the Kennedy Center next time.

yeh, that'll only cost $500,000
JUST KIDDING!! !!! !!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 570466)
It's an example of a bunch of losers going "see? see? see?" They never point backwards.
No offense to you, classic. I'm glad it was brought up.

Really, it's ridiculous, but people run around like sheep going "BAH? Bah? Bah bah bah? Well, Bah!" Shocking. :cool:

There is an awful lot of that going around right now. That rudderless ship needs a serious tune-up, its almost as bad as Gov't Motors.



Ohh......
Quote:

Originally Posted by tw-at
:dedhorse: Blah :dedhorse: blah :dedhorse:blah :dedhorse:blah:dedhorse:

STFU - That has nothing to do with it.

ZenGum 06-03-2009 08:08 PM

So, what do you reckon happened after the date?

I tell you, if I take a girl out and spend upwards of twenty grand showing her a good time, helicopters, planes, limos etc, damn I expect some ACTION afterwards!

:doit: :doit: :doit: :doit: :doit: :doit:

Clodfobble 06-03-2009 09:33 PM

You know it totally ruins the mood, when your mother-in-law lives in the same house with you.

ZenGum 06-03-2009 10:08 PM

So, do they go parking? Would that be on G street?

glatt 06-04-2009 07:39 AM

mile high club. Just send the secret service guys up into the front of the plane.

TheMercenary 06-07-2009 08:21 PM

Paris date in a little nice bistro, no wine was served.

300 euros

about $425.309 USD for one meal. I can't ever think of a day I spent that much for a meal the size of French portions.

ZenGum 06-07-2009 08:29 PM

Ahh, but it waz zee cheeze, you must unnerstand, so fine, so deeliscious, ahh, it is even worth surrendering for, is it not so?

Ahh, you crude Americans, go eat your 'amburgers. Zere is a reason zey are so cheap.

Shawnee123 06-07-2009 08:31 PM

Well you just eatcha sum of them thar snails y'all like so much. How cheap is snails, they's just crawlin' around on the ground...and in our kitchen.

TheMercenary 06-07-2009 09:10 PM

Damm snails must be highly prized. Eh.

Meh. Fuck snails.

Give me a big plate of pasta!

Shawnee123 06-07-2009 09:13 PM

Me too! I had a friend in college who went to Italy for the summer and came back skinny. She said all she ate was pasta but they walked up and down the hilly streets so much it was good for her.

Let's all eat a bunch of pasta and walk around Italy! :)

TheMercenary 06-07-2009 09:17 PM

I'm in.

ZenGum 06-07-2009 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 571557)
Damm snails must be highly prized. Eh.

Meh. Fuck snails.

Give me a big plate of pasta!

The pasta you may have, but you leave those poor snails alone. Sicko.

:sheep: (Couldn't find a snail-screwing smiley).

TheMercenary 06-08-2009 05:44 PM

I don't believe he can do it. Not without much more spending. So far the job creation promises have been a complete failure.

Quote:

WASHINGTON (AP) - Eager to show action on the ailing economy, President Barack Obama promised Monday to speed federal money into hundreds of public works projects this summer, vowing that 600,000 jobs will be created or saved.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

ZenGum 06-08-2009 05:56 PM

Created or saved.

Loophole alert. How are you going to count that?

TheMercenary 06-08-2009 06:43 PM

Good question. I asked that question repeatedly during the promises made in the immediate post election period.

Well, I asked myself that anyways.

classicman 06-08-2009 07:13 PM

Obama repackages stimulus plans with old promises
Quote:

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama assured the nation his recovery plan was on track Monday, scrambling to calm Americans unnerved by unemployment rates still persistently rising nearly four months after he signed the biggest economic stimulus in history.

Obama admitted his own dissatisfaction with the progress but said his administration would ramp up stimulus spending in the coming months. The White House acknowledged it has spent only $44 billion, or 5 percent, of the $787 billion stimulus, but that total has always been expected to rise sharply this summer.

He also repeated an earlier promise to create or save 600,000 jobs by the end of the summer.

Neither the acceleration nor the jobs goal are new. Both represent a White House repackaging of promises and projects to blunt criticism that the effects haven't been worth the historic price tag. And the job estimate is so murky, it can never be verified.

The economy has shed 1.6 million jobs since the stimulus measure was signed in February, far overshadowing White House announcements estimating the effort has saved 150,000 jobs. Public opinion of Obama's handling of the economy has declined along with the jobs data.

For the first time, the administration admitted the economic forecasts it used to sell the stimulus were overly optimistic.

"At the time, our forecast seemed reasonable," Vice President Joe Biden's top economic adviser, Jared Bernstein, said Monday, explaining that the White House underestimated the scope of the recession. "Now, looking back, it was clearly too optimistic."

By now, according to earlier White House economic models, the nation's unemployment rate should be on the decline. The forecasts used to drum up support for the plan projected today's unemployment would be about 8 percent. Instead, it sits at 9.4 percent, the highest in more than 25 years.

Some analysts believe the White House is still not being realistic, that Obama will be lucky if any real job creation from his recovery effort is seen by the end of the year, let alone the employment explosion he predicts.

"I think these estimates are overly optimistic," said Arpitha Bykere, a senior analyst with RGE Monitor.
Wow and some posters thought Reagan's deficits were a bad idea. Yikes!
Perhaps we should all invest in vaseline...

TheMercenary 06-08-2009 08:29 PM

No surprises there.

Shawnee123 06-09-2009 08:59 AM

Quote:

Wow and some posters thought Reagan's deficits were a bad idea. Yikes!
Perhaps we should all invest in vaseline...
I stocked up during the Bushie years...rented a warehouse...it's almost empty but I have a couple jars left.

classicman 06-09-2009 12:01 PM

Ahhh - you financial types always hoarding stuff for yourselves. :P

Shawnee123 06-09-2009 12:04 PM

I should have sat on them (pun intended.) I could make a killing when the Vaseline industry fails.

classicman 06-09-2009 11:23 PM

Obama seeks fiscal responsibility mantle
Quote:

President Barack Obama sought on Tuesday to show he was serious about improving the U.S. budget picture as he called on Congress to pass new limits on tax cuts and spending programs to avoid adding to deficits.

Obama urged passage of "pay-as-you-go" legislation that would require any new tax cut or automatic spending program to be paid for within the budget.

"The 'pay as you go' principle is very simple. Congress can only spend a dollar if it saves a dollar elsewhere," Obama said in a speech at the White House attended by several Democratic members of Congress.

"Entitlement increases and tax cuts need to be paid for. They are not free," said Obama, who has been criticized by Republicans for proposing a hefty domestic agenda that includes overhauling the health care system, bolstering education and tackling global climate change.

The White House has forecast a budget deficit for this year of $1.84 trillion, or 12.9 percent of gross domestic product.

Republicans have warned that programs such as the proposed health care plan would add to the budget deficit for years to come and have also criticized Obama's $787 billion stimulus plan, which was passed by Congress in February.
Wait Whaat?

Shawnee123 06-10-2009 12:19 PM

Headline:

Obama FARTS. Ruins OZONE. Spends 40 dollars on AIR FRESHENER. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

I never saw so much watchdogging, not during the years spent getting us into the whole mess.

Urbane Guerrilla 06-10-2009 01:12 PM

In other unsurprising findings: Rev. Wright still an unreconstructed A-hole.

A-holes should get their shit wiped slick.

glatt 06-10-2009 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla (Post 572506)
A-holes should get their shit wiped slick.

I don't know what this means, exactly, but it sounds a little disgusting.

Shawnee123 06-10-2009 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glatt (Post 572507)
I don't know what this means, exactly, but it sounds a little disgusting.

And gave me a much needed giggle! I don't know what it means either, but I'm sure of two things:

1) It's disgusting AND
2) It's something about hating liberals

:lol:

classicman 06-10-2009 01:39 PM

maybe he needed a comma in there as in...
A-holes should get their shit wiped, slick.
Perhaps ( just arguing here) he was referring to someone as "slick" :headshake
Ya know like "Hey Slick, let go bake some cookies."

Shawnee123 06-10-2009 01:51 PM

Hahahaha...I haven't used "slick" since I was maybe 16. Sometimes we'd change it up and say "Hey there, schlick."

:lol:

Sorry, these laughs are coming in very handy right now.

classicman 06-10-2009 01:59 PM

Keep in mind we are talking about UG here :)

ZenGum 06-10-2009 08:23 PM

:lol:

he's tryin' to be hip and groovy?

spudcon 06-10-2009 10:51 PM

I don't think UG was bashing liberals, I think he was bashing a racist bigot a-hole.

classicman 06-10-2009 10:56 PM

I think most of us got that spud - we just like bustin his chops - ya know?

Shawnee123 06-11-2009 08:38 AM

Yeah, spud, because it was such a sly and unexpected diversion from the immediate subject at hand, ya know? Very UG-like, in both smell, I mean style, and appearance. :)

TheMercenary 06-12-2009 07:19 AM

Obama's First Pardon

http://www.necn.com/Boston/Politics/...244803305.html

classicman 06-12-2009 08:17 AM

Thats cute

sugarpop 06-16-2009 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 565139)
Cite some examples of that sugar.

It was back when he had that brain tumor over a year ago. I refuse to go look for something that was that long ago. All I can say is, I was a member of another board at the time, full of rightwing jerks, and most of them wished him dead, as did a few pundits on the right as well (publicly).

classicman 06-16-2009 03:42 PM

You refuse to prove your outrageous OPINION because its too much trouble? That's BS. Perhaps some extremist zealots wished him dead just like many did for Bush, Cheney, Obama, Pelosi and so on.

Whew!

sugarpop 06-16-2009 07:19 PM

I was stating something that happened on another BB. Period. I don't feel like googling and looking for really old posts about it. I don't feel the need to prove anything there. Sorry. FTR, I don't see WHY it would be so hard to believe Rush or Michael Savage or Michelle Malkin or one of those people would say something like that. They are extremely hateful and spew crap like that all the time.

classicman 06-16-2009 09:16 PM

Laziness is no excuse. So do your beloved - get real. Its all about what you want to believe.

sugarpop 06-16-2009 09:57 PM

No, it's what I hear with my ears that makes me KNOW, not believe, what I heard.

classicman 06-16-2009 10:04 PM

If it is said, then it must be true... ok - gotcha.

sugarpop 06-16-2009 10:07 PM

Good grief. Do you not trust your ears when you hear, say, Nancy Pelosi say something really stupid?

classicman 06-16-2009 10:35 PM

No sugar, I don't believe everything I hear nor read nor see. I try to get facts to back it up before spreading misinformation and half-truths. Hey, but thats just me.

You still cannot justify your statement. Probably because outside of that idiot Limballs there weren't many.

sugarpop 06-16-2009 11:20 PM

OK, we are obviously not communicating. If you hear someone say something, then the fact that THEY SAID IT is what I'm talking about, not whether what they said was true or accurate or relevant or nice or mean. I said some neocons said they hoped Ted Kennedy would die back when he was first diagnosed with a brain tumor. It has nothing to do with whether what they said is relevant. It is what they said. Those were the words coming out of their mouths. Get it? That isn't my OPINION. It is what they actually said. Why would just lie and make that up?

classicman 06-16-2009 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarpop (Post 574936)
Why would just lie and make that up?

That is something only you can answer. I can only guess as to your motivations.

All I asked you to do was prove that some elected official wished that another elected official with a brain tumor would die. As of yet you have been unable to do so.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.