![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
we should have a national guard to defend our security, like I said... but our military doesn't really help defend our freedom. |
Quote:
|
If you can justify militarism and invasion/occupation to me without sounding like UG... have at it. My mind is NEVER as made up as it sounds, trust me. I'm a teenager after all, right?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Regarding the mountains; we had oceans at one point but I guess they dried up. I agree with Ibby's general tone. |
i know i may be oversimplifying things a bit, but the gist of Ibram's thoughts are that if we just roll up the military and bring everyone back into our borders, then everyone will quit being mad at us and we'll have nothing to worry about?
Griff, you're old enough to know better. I'm not saying rampant imperialism is desireable, but isolationism is just as impractical. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Every step of the way the republic has been moving closer to failure. A portion of every generation since the first has been certain that the failure was nearly complete. The country is changing but that is nothing new. It swings too far to the right then too far to the left and then... So what are you going to do? Wall yourself off from the world because it doesn't fit neatly into the box you think it should? I doubt it. You'll keep getting up in the morning and doing your job. You'll raise your kids the best you can. You'll grow old, all the while being convinced that the republic is failing - and you'll be right. and wrong. the republic won't always be the world's largest superpower. that is inevitable. But once upon a time the average person in England couldn't conceive of a time when they wouldn't be at the center of global discussion. Times change and it seems to me that they are still living just fine there. |
I, too, agree with the tone of Ibram's posts. But I read them differently. Not as a cry for a return to isolationism, but as a call for a more rational use of our (considerable) military might.
We **HAVE** awesome military power, and it is powerfully appealing to want to use the biggest hammer in the toolbox. But it is not always the best option. It is not always the most effective means of achieving a result. Even when a goal is laudable, it may be a poor use of the military as well. They're soldiers and sailors and marines and airmen and coasties. As part of their job, they may know how to build a bridge or a school. They may know how to talk to a civilian suspect. They're clearly highly competent in their areas of speciality, and their training is excellent. But they're not nation builders. They're not even peace keepers. They're warriors, right? Isn't that what they train for? For war. During this administration, they've been used and abused as a blunt heavy instrument. Not all our problems, problems we share with others can be bombed into submission. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.