The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   S3930 - Detainee bill (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=11861)

piercehawkeye45 05-01-2007 01:47 PM

I'm about a third of the way through.

Scary shit.

Kitsune 05-01-2007 02:03 PM

If you don't have time to listen, reading the transcript (PDF) might work better.

TheMercenary 05-01-2007 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dar512 (Post 269290)
Is anyone else worried about this? It scares the heck out of me.

Not really...

Kitsune 05-01-2007 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 339671)
Not really...

Indefinite detention in prison as guilty until proven innocent under secret evidence without the ability to consult a lawyer? Worries me. A lot.

TheMercenary 05-01-2007 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kitsune (Post 339684)
Indefinite detention in prison as guilty until proven innocent under secret evidence without the ability to consult a lawyer? Worries me. A lot.

It would me too, if you are an American citizen who is subsequently subject to the Constitution. Non-citizens have no claim to the US Constitution under any circumstances.

piercehawkeye45 05-01-2007 11:14 PM

Merc, what is happening is that the US put out bounties for "Al Qaeda" members and then people would tip off the Americans about innocent people just to receive the money. Those innocent people were tortured while the US knew they were innocent but were too prideful to let them go and admit their huge mistake.

That shouldn't be a scary thing directed at you. It should be a scary thing that your country would do something like that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary
Non-citizens have no claim to the US Constitution under any circumstances.

They still have every claim to be protected under Habeas Corpus and the Geneva Convention.

TheMercenary 05-01-2007 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 (Post 339842)
Merc, what is happening is that the US put out bounties for "Al Qaeda" members and then people would tip off the Americans about innocent people just to receive the money. Those innocent people were tortured while the US knew they were innocent but were too prideful to let them go and admit their huge mistake.

That shouldn't be a scary thing directed at you. It should be a scary thing that your country would do something like that.

Look I understand that early on, mistakes were made. Many people I personally know have said so. Those mistakes cannot be undone. On the other hand, it did not take long for people to wise up to the errors of those with alterior motives. To bad it took over 2 years for that to happen. If you are truly an EC, I say fuck you, go to Bulgaria or Egypt and let them have their way with you. But I hear you, understand your concerns. I share them and the damage that has been done. I belive that the vetting process has been improved, even if some of the damage done so far is not repairable. It is the best I can hope for at this point.

TheMercenary 05-01-2007 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 (Post 339842)
They still have every claim to be protected under Habeas Corpus and the Geneva Convention.

GC, Yes... HC, no. HC is not covered in the GC.

piercehawkeye45 05-01-2007 11:23 PM

Just because it isn't in the Geneva Convention doens't mean that we should just not bother with it. We should setting a standard to the rest of the world saying that we give everyone a fair trial.

TheMercenary 05-01-2007 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 (Post 339849)
Just because it isn't in the Geneva Convention doens't mean that we should just not bother with it. We should setting a standard to the rest of the world saying that we give everyone a fair trial.

Ummmm.... no. That is what the GC is for. To set a standard by which everyone can agree on. Not more, not a projection of our Consitutional Rights afforded to us as US citizens to non-citizens. Ain't happening. We have made huge errors, don't get me wrong. I have friends who were at the Abu Ghraib prison immediately after the blow out. It was not pretty. As a soldier at the time I was not in a position to judge. Now, based on all we know, not enough of the top brass hung by their balls. History will be the judge. I have friend who to this day are in the active service of a number of agencies in the government. They do good work. They do it to the best of their abilities.

Happy Monkey 05-01-2007 11:58 PM

The Constitution doesn't give rights to US citizens; it restricts the authority of the US government. The only thing that gives them wiggle room on Guantanimo is that they're pretending that Guantanimo isn't under US jurisdiction.

tw 05-01-2007 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 339844)
Look I understand that early on, mistakes were made. Many people I personally know have said so. Those mistakes cannot be undone.

Exact same phrases used in Nuremburg to justify what we much later called the holocaust. It was only a mistake. They did not know. They did not realize.

One of the lessons from the Zimbardo famous study was that many will blindly do as they are told even if they knew it was killing someone. Rather than be a decent person and stop killing another, well, it was only a mistake.

TheMercenary belittles felony crimes into a mistake. A mistake as so many Germans said when confronted with evidence called the holocaust. Only a mistake when enemies of America (called the George Jr administration) 'make a mistake' to impose a political (and religious) agenda on all others. After all, that is the same reasons that justified National Socialism. Had TheMercenary called them ‘anti-American dumb’ or extremists, then it is an honest attempt to explain such crimes. These were not mistakes. Good people don’t make these mistakes. Extremist dumb followers of extremists may blindly make such mistakes for two years? Two years? TheMercenary demonstrates what happens when the keys to an asylum are given to the inmates. TheMercenary demonstrates what happens when political agendas rather than intelligence justifies actions.

When did they 'realize' it was a mistake? When threatened with prosecution.

Those who are extremists must justify everything by a political agenda. When caught - as Germans in Nuremburg – only then it is called a mistake. For two years wacko extremist Americans (ie Cheney) continued to make the same mistakes? Only when criminal minds know no difference between right and wrong. It was only a mistake when one was driving 120 MPH down the highway and killed 35? Of course. It was only a mistake.

Appreciate the attitude of those who promote and defend the George Jr administation. it was only a mistake - the tens of millions whose lives have been destroyed. Had George Jr done this same thing as the President of Iraq, he would have been hanged just like Saddam - and not for a mistake.

TheMercenary 05-02-2007 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 339866)
The Constitution doesn't give rights to US citizens; it restricts the authority of the US government. The only thing that gives them wiggle room on Guantanimo is that they're pretending that Guantanimo isn't under US jurisdiction.

The only thing giving them wiggle room is that the detainees are NOT US citizens.

Happy Monkey 05-02-2007 12:04 AM

Wrong. A foreign national in a US court gets full protections.

TheMercenary 05-02-2007 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 339867)
Bla, bla, bla, bla, bla... bla, bla. Bla, bla, bla bla...

TheMercenary belittles felony crimes into a mistake.

What felonies? Who has belittles? Please you must try to be more clear in your arguments. Connecting loosely associated subjects is a sign of a serious illness. Where do you cut and paste your conspiracy notions from?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.