![]() |
I believe what they were shipping were more accurate munitions to try to prevent as much collateral damage as possible. :cool:
|
mmmm...... says it all......
god'damit..... those ayrab towelheads.... all the same..... |
I somehow missed the place where when you're attacked you're required to only defend yourself "proportionately"...and when combatants hide among civilians you're guilty of a "collective punishment" war crime when you defend yourself. You'd better do some more detailed investigation of the Law of War, because you're talking out your ass on this one.
What a load of "moral equivalance" bullshit. When you are attacked with deadly force, you are entiitled to defend yourself with deadly force, and you need not stop until you are no longer threatened. |
Quote:
|
There is no justification for this, maggie.....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/5228224.stm Go on, defend the indefensible..... |
Quote:
That worked , then...... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/5228224.stm |
Quote:
200 sunk ships off east coast US was not justification for war. Yes, a country does have the right to defend itself. But even 200 sunk ships is not justification. A trivial kidnapping of some soldiers also does not meet that 'smoking gun' criteria. By now, everyone who was here when we discussed Iraq in 2002 should have no doubt about that history lesson. War without a smoking gun is not justified. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...3816,00.html#n Quote:
Aussie Herald Sun, under the headline "Photos that Damn Hisbullah". It's a bit of overstatement but here are their two shots, smuggled out of the area, of un-uniformed Hez fighters, dressed to walk away and blend in, moving mobile cannons and launchers and firing right out of a suburban zone. http://cellar.org/2006/damn1.jpg http://cellar.org/2006/damn3.jpg When irregulars move strategically in and out of civilian areas and are fired upon, killing the civilians, this is a war crime. Jay, it is a war crime for the irregulars. And this is very clear. Hezbollah is the operational government in the area. It is their job to defend and protect civilians. Instead they intentionally ensure that civilian targets will be fired upon. There is no excuse for this sort of behavior. You can't defend it - it is indefensible. |
Quote:
|
http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government...0-Jul-2006.htm
This page contains four videos of actual Hezbollah rocket launches from the middle of towns, right next to residential buildings and homes. It also contains a copy of the leaflet dropped telling the citizens to abandon the war zone. |
http://cellar.org/2006/ricebanner.jpg
This 30-foot-high banner of Condi appeared on the streets on Beirut hours after the Qana attack, protesting it. Translation: "The massacre of children in Qana 2, is the gift of Rice. The clever bombs... Stupid" Powerline asks the leading question Quote:
|
That's a nasty picture.....her husband won't like that. ;)
They must have excellent printing services to whip up that banner in a couple hours...or less. |
Quote:
All the terrorists have to do is throw down their AK47 or drop their RPG and theyre 'civillians', and then when they get a bomb dropped on them theyre just another 'civillian' casualty. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.