Quote:
|
Ummm...I appreciate the endorsement Saddam, but I wasn't quite looking for yours.
|
you know what's effed up? I'd like to tear off a little piece of hayward for posting the way she did before she knew who she was correcting, but i'm still pretty sure that its just dave in drag.
....but then there's that last post from bruce....... i did notice, however, that there is a noticeable parrallel in this thread to the .juju/dave argument , but without the name calling and bruised feelings.....the same argument but both sides are being civil.......and this looks like both sides can see the others point. Is this a lesson? ....but then there's that last post from bruce...... oh, and syc is not sick.......although i can see how you'd be confused |
Quote:
|
Quote:
who is she, then? |
Quote:
|
link won't load...mind paraphrasing?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
"cunt" and "retards"...(!)(?)
CLEARLY, I am the idiot here. Wow, there's so much wrong with those words, I am breathless. |
That's part of your problem. There is nothing wrong with those words or in fact any words.
The things that may be right, wrong or somewhere in between are motives, methods, and messages. |
So...............whadya think..........eh, never mind. This looks strangely interesting.
|
"There is nothing wrong with those words or in fact any words."
Um...is that a fact or an opinion? Read: any and all of Sycamore dissection posts. |
"Those who feel they (a) cannot contribute to a discussion (b) cannot further their expertise in said discussion and (c) are flat-out rude/mean resort to arguing semantics and/or name calling"
~HaywardNelson Once an opinion but has now been hereby classified as fact. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.