E=mc^2.
Clearly that is no longer correct because it is a repost. Is that your logic?

Funny thing about history. The one who did not get all hot and bothered using 'them verses us' hype accurately disagreed with the majority about Kuwait and accurately disagreed with the majority about "Mission Accomplished". How can that be? One of us routinely ignored the emotional hype to first see facts. One of us also had no problem with any posts from marichiko or april. However this same one had serious problem with their censorship when it was based in emotional bias - not in anything logical. In each case, where is the logical justification stated?

Others had posted obvious spam. They were banned - and rightly so because the censorship was based in logic. Can you tell the difference between emotion and logic? One reason why posts are longer (when they are not factious) is that I post reasons with those posts. No reasons? Then I am no different than a scumbag named Limbaugh. Meanwhile. lookout123 - explain why a repost of the same idea makes the concept wrong? It does only if you are posting propaganda spin without supporting facts and examples.

I see no logical fact posted that justified so much hate of marichiko. I see plenty of emotion. I can grasp one fact that might justify the censorship. But I have yet to see anyone post that justification.

No. His logic is that you don't read anyone else's posts and just post the same thing in every single thread in which you participate. His logic is quite correct. As you just proved.

explain to me why reposting them over and over is proof of their accuracy. oh nevermind - i just remembered that in the last couple of years, you have not answered one single question i've asked of you.

but, i don't think i questioned the accuracy of your statements - that is a different debate. what i question is why you choose to use every single thread as a place to drop the same post - regardless of the original thread topic. something about everything looking like a nail to a guy who's only got a hammer?

you claim that you and you alone have the superior skills that enable you to utilize the "ONE RIGHT WAY"patent pending in analyzing info. you seem to think that you discuss things without emotion, yet you are usually one of the first to stoop to personal insults and name calling if everyone doesn't immediately say "shit, why didn't i think of that? why did i even think about posting before asking tw what the truth was??"

seriously get over yourself. you might actually win people over to your way of thinking if you considered that people who don't always agree with you might not be inferior to you. *gasp* just a thought.

Under the heading of "tw can't edit": verses for versus, more than once. Tw does not know English. Except distantly.

Lookout, ever given sufficient thought to the idea you might be superior by a long chalk to the Cellar's resident Soviet Communist and number one anti-Americanist? I put it that way because he seems to make a hobby of it.

OMG - I just pissed myself I was laughing so hard.

Funny, I would think you of all people would have a problem with being repeatedly lied to.

Most of the accusations of lying were pretty weak.

Speaking of reposts...:p

I guess you believe she can put a staple through a specific mailbox lock at 5 paces.

Or that her new dog could get offlead and run away and thus lead to a "find" of a neighbors' "sticks of dynamite".

Anybody can, if it's an accident.

Quote:

Or that her new dog could get offlead and run away and thus lead to a "find" of a neighbors' "sticks of dynamite".

It was a road flare.

this, i'm convinced, was from an episode of Little House on the Prairie.

wtf? why are you hitching your wagon to her like this happymonkey?

I'm not. I'm hitching it against stupid bans.

you keep sniping like that then. let me know how it works out for you.

Look, she's fuckin' gone now, for better or for worse, drop it people.

Whatever.