WB MaggieL!

strawman.

You're excused.

What problem?

I could tell you about one BIG one. but, then I'd be a bitch. too risky.

It would be helpful if you would elucidate your position a bit, V: is it, "I don't think Tiki's batshit insane," or "Having batshit insane people around helps keep things lively."

Both of which are completely valid opinions worthy of discussion. But it's hard to go anywhere with just passive-aggressive statements.

Or perhaps his position was something like

-Tiki and people who express dissenting opinions aren't an actual problem

or

-the ability to tell insane ramblings based on cherry picking evidence doesn't make you a bithc

or

-the real problem is that people turn into dicks when challenged here half the time an dimmediately start calling eachother names

oh wait. that is what *I* meant.

Some people will defend their friends no matter how they behave.

I reckon that could be a good thing.

Sometimes it's good to take a break when you feel you're in too deep too. If someone's in your face or you find yourself behaving in a way which you're not happy with, and especially if you don't notice it till it's pointed out to you, it's often a worthwhile time to have a bit of respite.

I'm sure they'll be back when they're ready, no matter what it is that's keeping them away.

I think it's the asian hookers. I vaguely remember LJ saying Jinx had a problem with asian hookers.

She accidentally scheduled two at the same time?

Sure, CF, I'd be happy to oblige you.

I don't think Tiki is batshit insane. Furthermore, I am offended when remarks like this are made about anyone. Specifically, non-passively-aggressively, Monster is excused for talking out of her ass in the post I quoted. I was being funny, not passive aggressive, since when we fart in my house, an "excuse me" is in order. She makes noises out her ass like that, I prompt her accordingly.

My next post seems pretty plain, and I'm sure you understand it. Undertoad alluded to some problem, I asked for clarification as to what situation he was referring to, "what problem"? Perhaps he was suggesting that Jim's absence was a problem; that seems grammatically correct based on the flow of the posts, but since I don't consider his absence, more specifically, the absence of his remarks like Monster's above, a problem, I was a little confused. Hence, my request for clarification.

I hope this elucidation has been helpful.

I'm all ears.

plthijinx?