![]() |
Quote:
We'll have his name before long. |
Winding its way downward. It seemed pretty bad when first reported, when it seemed like they were doing it to only the right, but that turned out to be false. The guy who initially reported that they were targetting the Tea Party turned out to have been told to find any bad treatment of the Tea Party, and failed to report that the list of keywords was across the board.
Who "it's up to" doesn't matter much if "it" isn't actually a scandal. |
Conversely, if they "who it's up to" has already been decided, the "it" is merely a placeholder.
|
Adak, only one story got told because only one person walked away. Let's say that Trayvon turned and noticed that Zimmerman had drawn a gun. Even without Stand Your Ground, it's not possible to outrun a bullet. So he closes and attempts to disarm Zimmerman, which might include tackling him into the concrete. It was never clear how Zimmerman could have gotten to his gun lying on his back. Unless he already had his gun already drawn. After all, isn't that what real cops do when approaching a dangerous suspect? So wouldn't a wannabe follow the same procedure?
If Zimmerman drew his weapon before being attacked, then "Stand Your Ground" was with Trayvon. Not that it would have done him any good if he'd been the sole survivor. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
and have not been able to find via my Google searches. What I have found are sequences of events that speak to phone calls between Martin and his girl friend, both before and at the time of the shooting. Attachment 44856 What I have also found is the following statement in this link, and that agrees with what I had heard reported over the course of these events... Quote:
Adak, Will you please document or cite a link to support your statement that Martin actually arrived at his girl friend's home, and then went back to "fix that cracker". |
I'll take a wild stab in the dark and say someone on Fox News said it?
|
Lamplighter, you should go outside, *now*, and check your hubcaps.
|
:D
|
Is that why rims are so popular? Much harder to steal?
|
Quote:
Quote:
A plausible explanation would be a combat handgun technique called the rock back draw. It can be performed standing or as one is being taken down to the ground. The shooter uses one arm to push off from an assailant at point blank range, the shooter bending backwards at the waist, creating more distance for the other arm to draw and fire unimpeded from the waist. Zimmerman could have drawn his gun just before he hit the ground and then waited until he felt he couldn't recover before firing. Of course, this would've had to have happened without Martin realizing what Zimmerman was up to it since there doesn't seem to have been an ensuing struggle for the weapon between when it was drawn and when it was fired. The more likely explanation is that Zimmerman was able to arch the small of his back or twist his body just enough to create a space to draw the gun. All it takes is a hand-on-gun thickness of space to free the gun and very little maneuvering to get it into firing position, especially when an assailant doesn't realize it's there. That Zimmerman was unable to better protect his head using both of his arms to block Martin's thrusts and blows indicates that Zimmerman may have been using one arm for retrieving the gun while he was on the ground and that Martin, concentrating on battering Zimmerman's head, simply didn't have a clue as to why he was having such an easy time of it until he was shot. Hypothetically speaking of course. |
Quote:
All the rest is hypothetical. Right ? |
Left.
|
Quote:
That was reported by the media, immediately after the incident. Of course, I was interested in the case, and began perusing several media sources - on the net, and several radio stations, including KNX 1070 (a CBS Affiliate), out of Los Angeles, and a local FOX radio station, among others. Then everything started changing: The DA found nothing to charge Zimmerman with, after several hours of questioning, after the shooting, but in the wake of pressure from the community, a new prosecutor miraculously found Zimmerman should be charged with murder! Martin's dad changed his opinion of the voice screaming for help on the 911 calls (to the dispatcher), but nobody could agree, even the "experts" and the FBI. Some sources are saying Zimmerman changed his story as well. The witnesses changed theirs. Quite the mess. I did find this, very interesting though: Quote:
Quote:
In the actual call to the PD, Zimmerman says Martin is approaching him, while he's still in his truck. "With his hands in his waistband". You can hear the entire call to the PD (not a dispatcher on this call), and read all the above quoted info, on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin Zimmerman doesn't sound like a racist, to me. Listen for yourself. There's a ton of other info on this - what evidence was allowed at the trial, and what evidence was not allowed, and why. Zimmerman's description of Martin "he's just walking around, looking into houses..." does strike me as suspicious, in light of Martin's previous possession of several pieces of women's jewelry, and a screwdriver. I have never heard of a teenage guy walking around, carrying several pieces of womens' jewelry, and a screwdriver. That is a burglar. Was he "casing" homes when Zimmerman found him? I have no idea. But he definitely was a burglar when he was caught earlier with the womens' jewelry and screwdriver. Ask any cop. Martin didn't deserve to be shot over a burglary, but it shows why Zimmerman wanted to confront Martin. |
Hmm, jewelry and a screwdriver... must have been looking for the white women. :rolleyes:
|
Quote:
The gf testified Martin said: Quote:
I can't find any reference to Martin using the term "fix", in that phrase. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.