Name one. Give me a chance...

sorry, I edited that mentally but not physically to say "pretty much all of us"

It is a bizarre false equivalency that has come up around Redux and Merc. Can anyone come up with an equivalent to post 46, but with the roles reversed?

I dunno, but right now i'm really hoping no-one invokes Rule 34.

Monster...I am open to suggestions on how to improve my posts.

But please tell me how my posts offering a perspective on the Voting Rights Act or a post on the UN treaty on small arms...or my post on the recent FTC action on journalism and the internet were offensive rather than an honest attempt to address what, IMO, was a misrepresentation of the facts.

Or how providing budget, enforcement and crime data in the AZ immigration discussion was disrespectful?

All I get is the same old responses (failed, bullshit, partisan suck up....) to whatever I post..and yes, I respond in kind.

INVOKE RULE 34
Don't remember what that is, I'm tired, and I've had a couple beers.

Maybe I should just go over to chat.

That's a great turn of phrase. I think you should copyright it. :)

ARe you diagnosed with Aspergers Syndrome? Or anything on that spectrum?

I don't see a big purpose - you mean like a dolphin, right?

I thought my questions to you were reasonable...since you made it all about me.

I guess not.

I rhink she means like a special purpose....

I know mne was a reasonable question. I guess I got my answer.

Cool.

Are you finished now?

This is obviously a very significant issue, based on the number of responses.

I think we should wire up each of the 7 named individuals and have a button on each post saying "Tase the poster," which anyone can push, including the other 6.

I don't see that. It was pertinent to the discussion and civilly phrased. How was that cause for banning?