Let them go at it. We need a population reduction.

Meh. We receive more crud from the testing in the 60s than we would if those two attention whores burn each other to cinders.

The Chinese will catch some, though. Boo hoo hoo.

A long list of denials without a single supporting fact? Let's add reality to some of your denials:

The 1996 Federal Communication Act: Meanwhile the act forced anti-innovative communication companies to either provide a stifled 1981 technology called DSL, OR open their lines so that anyone could provide broadband. Yes, DSL technology was demonstrated even in 1981 when American communication companies were routinely stifling innovation - until 1996. Technology that should have been widely available in the 1990s still was not available until the 1996 Federal Communication Act all but required it.

Stopping massive worldwide terrorism planned for the Millennium (including LAX, NY Time Square, Toronto, Egypt, Amman Jordan, etc.):
You are supposed to learn basic history before having opinions. Those attacks stopped by Clinton are common knowledge. Even described in detail by Richard Clark who was head of the White House CounterTerrorism Security Group (CSG). It takes almost nothing to learn how Clinton mobilized then entire government resulting in Diana Dean finding an LAX bomb in WA. Same attacks to even sink the USS The Sullivans failed (because bombers loaded too much explosives and sunk their own boat).

Clinton regarded bin Laden as the number one threat to America which is why he even created Alec Station - a group assigned only to get bin Laden. As Richard Clark so bluntly said, "George W Bush, who failed to act on the threats from Al Qaeda despite repeated warnings ..." Clinton personally warned President-elect Bush of the threat he considered the most dangerous. Nobody could have asked more of Clinton. When Cofer Black warned of the Millennium attack in December 1999, Clinton responded by mobilizing every government agency. FISA judges (secret courts to authorize wiretaps during national emergencies) were swamped with subpoena requests. Even the RCMP were informed of sleeper cells they did not know about. You did not know any of this? Meanwhile, George Jr latter disbanded Alec Station because terrorism was not a threat.

All that is common knowledge to those who learn. Naysaying is how those without knowledge use Limbaugh tactics to deny reality.

No credible links are necessary because you are expected to first know this basic history before having opinions. If you know Clinton did so little, then you must deny what every informed American knows: what Diana Dean did. A language often associated with those who always know and need not learn facts. Therefore you know Pakistan is not our f problem?

Knowledge easily identifies what is probably the greatest threat to the world and the US: Pakistan. Apparently you did not learn a long list of reasons why, or just don't care to know. So you have no appreciation of what Clinton did.

Then why didn't he take him out when Bin Laden was handed to him on a silver platter? Sounds like revisionist history to me.

Because Bin Ladin was never handed to him on a silver platter. That business has been debunked more times than I care to mention, and people STILL trot it out.

Clinton was a schmoe. Very few people will argue against that. But the "silver platter" business isn't true. It's just a stale Rovian talking point...effective vs Gore back in 2000, but a lie nonetheless.

Hey...conversation over.

When you can speak in a civil tone, let me know and we can continue.

TGRR,
Knows that appeal to "common knowledge" isn't evidence for a position.

:D

Heh:

.

And that's all she wrote.

From factcheck - It would be virtually unheard of to have concrete evidence on a matter like this.

Odd that the man in question was never a representative of the Sudanese government, and Sudan says they have no fucking clue who he is or what he was talking about.

But some neocon nutcase named Lawrence Wright says otherwise, so all involved people are therefore lying or part of a conspiracy.

Also...Newsmax? Are you taking the piss? Why not just link to Rush Limbaugh and be done with it?

Look it up yourself then. The newsmax link is audio of Clinton himself. If you had cared to actually read the links or check out the cites instead of frothing at the mouth like an idiot. The Washington Post link or the Factcheck ink weren't good enough? There were tons of links on subject. Do your homework next time. THis time you get an "F" as in FAIL.

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec..._chance_1.html



:lol: And you get a "P" as in Partisan Hack, Gullible, 1 each.

He repeatedly did using what was available. What secret did you withhold rather than contribute?

Why? Because he opposes your view? I fail to understand your logic.

Naw, because he decided to start screeching at me because I wouldn't accept the word of one neocon freak over everyone actually involved and/or present when the situation occurred.

Sorry if you're having trouble with it.