The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Rod Blagojevich (D) (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=18953)

classicman 12-14-2008 03:31 PM

When the initial reports came out they didn't highlight the fact that he was a D. As time went on he was listed as such in a more prominent way as the impending "better story" was coming to light.

If he had been an R, then that fact would have commanded more of the headline initially as the media would have taken a more "here's another one" stance. I think that is what Merc's point was.

I guess it really comes down to which outlet you got your info from and when. I do remember having to look carefully at one of the first article I saw because I wasn't familiar with him and really didn't know. The info was there, it just wasn't at the beginning of the article.

Shawnee123 12-15-2008 12:00 PM

Hey everybody...let's learn to multi-quote! It's fun, easy, and saves the reader 16 one-word posts in a row to annoy them.

;)

TheMercenary 12-15-2008 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 513610)
And had already been debunked by said post.

You miss the point. As usual.

TheMercenary 12-15-2008 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 513634)
When the initial reports came out they didn't highlight the fact that he was a D. As time went on he was listed as such in a more prominent way as the impending "better story" was coming to light.

If he had been an R, then that fact would have commanded more of the headline initially as the media would have taken a more "here's another one" stance. I think that is what Merc's point was.

I guess it really comes down to which outlet you got your info from and when. I do remember having to look carefully at one of the first article I saw because I wasn't familiar with him and really didn't know. The info was there, it just wasn't at the beginning of the article.

Correct. Same for the last 2 years of Demoncratic scandles. Hardly a mention of political affiliations until 24 or 48 hours out. And only when attention is drawn to that fact.

classicman 12-15-2008 05:05 PM

I think its a fair assessment that the first information that some people got had the political affiliation clearly noted. So in a sense you are both right or all right ... whatever.

xoxoxoBruce 12-19-2008 09:24 AM

Poo, I'm right and your wrong, neener neener neener. :lol2:

The Philly paper said Obama had checked on (audited) his staff and they didn't do anything wrong, but would not go into further detail until the official investigation of the Gov was done.

One of the first stories I read, said Obama made a recommendation to the Gov for a replacement. I can believe that.

Undertoad 01-20-2009 10:24 AM

You won't find the political affiliation of the Portland mayor in this story.

classicman 01-20-2009 10:36 AM

Imagine that.

It seems to be missing from wiki too.

Undertoad 01-20-2009 11:05 AM

Somebody removed it from Wikipedia a half-hour ago.

I've put it back.

classicman 01-20-2009 11:40 AM

Really? Are you serious UT? That is so lame.

Undertoad 01-20-2009 01:03 PM

Somebody else removed it again. I put it back.

dar512 01-20-2009 01:07 PM

It's gone again.

classicman 01-20-2009 01:35 PM

most interesting - I wonder why the fact that he is a Democrat would be repeatedly removed?

wolf 01-20-2009 01:40 PM

Apparently at least one AP story mis-identified him as a Republican.

His screwing a teenager was way too embarrassing for the Democrats.

TheMercenary 01-20-2009 01:41 PM

They don't want people to focus on the double standards. The press does it as well.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.