![]() |
Pangloss, you, by your philosophy of life and antigun sentiments, are incapable of resisting genocide, to effect. You may open your mouth to deplore it, but that won't keep you out of the "shower." I'm sure lots of Jews (and Christian Scientists and Gypsies) hollered "No, don't do this!" even louder than you would.
How many live now? Contrariwise, MaggieL and I, for two, are the ones who by the mere act of owning guns keep you safe from genocide (remember genocide sneaks up on its victims -- starts with a con-job, ends in an Auschwitz). Now why, exactly, should it be only we two to bear that load? You can do your share by attaining skill with firearms and other killing tools, Pangloss. Pacifism or passivism makes you dead. We resent like hell the prospect of being dragged down to Gehenna with you! When it comes to stopping the Einsatzkommandos, for the avoidable hatreds that set them up were already present, and a basic emotion like hatred will always be among humans, there's nothing like a 7.92mm Mauser slug transecting the brain for doing the stopping -- and justice also, no? The JPFO's argument that gun control (air quotes if you like, as "control" always takes the form of some sort of actual ban) is the handmaiden of episodes of genocide, sometimes taking decades before the slaughter happens (viz., Cambodia) has never been refuted or rebutted. The idea's been in the public arena for a dozen years now, and no counterargument has ever been put forth. Before you try and dismiss me as some insensitive crank, consider that I am a decent man who is offended by pogroms. And I can help make one into a fizzle. What's your story? Can you actually claim to have a moral position? If you can't kill a State's barbarians, no you cannot. |
I've considered that you were a decent man before, but not for very long.
|
Quote:
With defensive, proper, non-police uses of guns, and these are mostly of handguns because of their portability (a long arm you bear, a pistol you wear) running at about two and a half million annually -- mostly without a shot being fired -- Spexx's views are dangerously behind the curve and can get Spexx or his loved ones killed much more easily than, say, my views on the matter. There is a LOT here that you simply don't know, Spexx. I can recommend you a reading list that will at least allow you to speak intelligently. |
Quote:
(I seem to have grabbed your post for quoting before you edited it. There may be illumination in comparing first and second drafts.) |
Quote:
Your bathtub is more dangerous than my handgun. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And this isnt ego-driven, it's hatred-driven. Youre a genuinely bad person. |
Quote:
|
I vote for someone to give Ibram a gun to shoot UG!:rolleyes:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you understand that most legal defensive uses of firearms--about three-quarters of them--don't involve actually firing the weapon, but simply being willing to do so? When we include cases where only a warning shot was fired, the rate rises to 92%. That's the major fallacy of the "guns have no purpose besides killing" crowd. Of course, those cases are almost never reported by the media, and are often not reported to the cops. Legal defensive use of firearms involving discharging the weapon is seriously unreported in the media as well. |
Oh..by the way:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is my pistol
This is my gun One is for whipping One is for shooting bullets.:blush: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.