![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But, a 'turn-on' would definitely be pushing it. It is the reason they are there, a beautiful thing and there should be no shame in it nor reason to hide it. If someone becomes uncomfortable or aroused by it to the point of destraction... they need to seek professional help. |
NY Time Article
The New York Times has this article. Summary: Rich and middle-class working women have an easier time breastfeeding than hourly workers.
Quote:
Quote:
So, it becomes necessary to appeal the that more reliable motive for businesses, greed. Quote:
|
how long are we talking about per-pumping session? If it's 15-20 min every few hours then I can guess why it's not encouraged right now.
The two-tiered breastfeeding system?? Oh please. Guess what world? Cashiers don't get as many perks as the executives do, does this shatter your world? Get out more. |
I disagree...not two tiered but multi-tiered.
Big companies will have corporate policy plus individual bosses within the organization will flex some. Small companies will go with the personal feelings of the boss tempered by his relationship with the employee. It also depends on what kind of job the woman is expected(paid) to do. There's probably half as many tiers as there are people affected. So I'm saying there is no standard. But ladies, if you wish to feed or pump, probably the best way to get permission from the boss is get him involved. Let him in on the action....I mean program....yes that's it, the plan... make him part of the plan. Hell, it could even be a team building exercise. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thank you....thank you very much. :blush:
|
I see no reason why any woman shouldn't feed her infant in public. However she does it is her concern. If you can't cope with it, look the other way. Anyway, I've seen some fully grown people eating in public who are definitely disgusting/obscene in the way they consume their food.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, while I can imagine a discreet breastfeeding in church being just fine, I can also imagine a feeding in church being less than discreet and being distracting, taking attention away from where it belongs. You wouldn't eat a pizza in church would you? There's a time and place for everything. Also, I was imagining a fancy restaurant when I wrote that part about restaurants. It's really a moot point, because people typically don't bring babies to fancy restaurants. But I think a baby should not be fed at the table in a fancy restaurant. There is a certain atmosphere that others are expecting, and a breastfeeding baby doesn't fit in with that expectation. Unhealthy food aside, a mom breastfeeding in McDonalds would be just fine. With a minimal amount of discretion, breastfeeding in public is just fine, and I support it. |
If people are distracted from the sight/sound of a baby feeding while in church then they probably weren't really concentrating in the first place. Babies decide when they are hungry, which is more distracting-a screaming hungry child or a woman with a baby attached to her breast for twenty minutes? I know of a few churches in my area that actually have a room where they can see and hear the whole service from and can sit with babies/children who might be noisy or causing distraction (because lets face it, kids hate sitting quietly for an hour or more!). Why should mums have to miss out on socialisation simply because they've had a baby? Is that fair? breastfeeding isn't dirty or unhealthy, or unsanitary.
|
You can't preach to a hungry congregation. Noone is interested in their soul if their belly is empty.
To infants, nursing is the only sacrament there is. |
Quote:
|
We might not be on top for whale penis anymore, but we own the internets when it comes to utilitarian boobs.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.