The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Home Base (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Should IQ be a requirement? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=15102)

lumberjim 08-16-2007 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkzenrage (Post 375489)
LOL... so sad.

How exactly is it sad? did I hurt your feelings? do you pity me for my lowly 130's IQ? Are you just feeling blue because it seems like everyone is breaking your balls lately?

Or is it something else?

DanaC 08-16-2007 05:40 PM

The trouble with IQ tests is that they're very crude measures of intelligence. The more we learn about the human brain and the different kinds of intelligence, the less relevant those tests become.

busterb 08-16-2007 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perry Winkle (Post 375428)
I guess that explains how you've mastered (what seems like) practically every profession known to man. At the low end you claim to be a genius, at the top end you claim to be a "profound genius" or a savant.

No. Thats called nepotism.

Rexmons 08-16-2007 09:24 PM

How about the job of President of the United States? Should a person with an IQ that's below average be allowed to run one of the most powerful countries in the world? Could you imagine what kind of horrific decisions a person like that might make?

Aliantha 08-16-2007 10:46 PM

I think everyone except the person who posted 50th on this thread is stupid.

manephelien 08-17-2007 02:17 AM

It depends on what you're trying to measure. IQ doesn't say much, and IQ test results can vary depending on alertness level, physical condition (if you've spent the previous night spewing your guts out with a stomach flu you won't do yourself any justice) etc. A general IQ test isn't the best, but some sort of aptitude tests, of which the IQ test may be a small part, are common these days.

I would only use IQ tests to weed out the below average intelligence people in non-manual tasks, but I wouldn't require a manager to have a membership in Mensa, say. Many people with extremely high IQs have a very low EQ. I know I'd far rather work with a people person who isn't afraid to ask his or her co-workers when they're unsure about something than a hyper-smart know-it-all who thinks the sun shines out of his orifices.

HungLikeJesus 08-17-2007 10:49 AM

Maybe the real question is, "Should there be aptitude and knowledge testing requirements for politicians?"

kerosene 08-17-2007 10:57 AM

An IQ test would do well to indicate a person's ability to do a job...as a developer of IQ tests. That's probably all, though.

Cicero 08-17-2007 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha (Post 375661)
I think everyone except the person who posted 50th on this thread is stupid.

Counting to 50 again? I bet momma's proud.
:D
j/k

Cloud 08-17-2007 11:25 AM

Given the content of the written answers, the poll votes surprise me.

Spexxvet 08-17-2007 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LabRat (Post 375387)
...I got a 31 (perfect in the science reasoning section) on the ACT (eons ago) but have a hell of a time spelling. Chemistry kicks my ass. English? Dumb as a box of rocks. *shrug*
...

I think one of your ass-ets is that you are ass-tute. It must be the way you were reared.
Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 375400)
...
How about personality tests?

To check one's asshole quotient?

rkzenrage 08-17-2007 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 375505)
How exactly is it sad? did I hurt your feelings? do you pity me for my lowly 130's IQ? Are you just feeling blue because it seems like everyone is breaking your balls lately?

Or is it something else?

No, that I stated that my numbers are incorrect due to the nature of the tests, but you don't see that... you take them personally because you buy into the game.
Quote:

Originally Posted by HLJ (Post 375821)
Maybe the real question is, "Should there be aptitude and knowledge testing requirements for politicians?"

No, an empathy test.

lumberjim 08-17-2007 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkzenrage (Post 375422)
Nope just skill and aptitude. IQ tests are just tricks and tell you nothing.
Someone raised on a farm will test very low on IQ tests yet may be a genius, the questions are based on "common" knowledge.
Shows those who came up with them must have had low "IQ"s.

If I am honest on an IQ test I do pretty well, around 170-175, but if I decide to give answers that I know the test "wants" I get insanely high scores.

Both tests are the same in this respect.

Someone may have an aptitude that has nothing to do with their general knowlege... it is a ridiculous idea.

maybe i didnt understand what you meant by honest.

SteveDallas 08-17-2007 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cloud (Post 375832)
Given the content of the written answers, the poll votes surprise me.

I personally haven't voted because none of the answers exactly matches my opinion.

LabRat 08-17-2007 01:53 PM

Ditto.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.