You just made me spit a mouthful of coffee all over my laptop, thankyou.

Anytime ;)

boy, that's completely backwards.

women like nice romantic sex when they're young. IMO,It's not until they've had more experience that they start to enjoy a little more aggressive sex.

You really should cop to the satire here now radar. people might think you're serious. I mean, c'mon. who's gonna take advice about sex from a constitutional scholar?

I'm about as manly as any of you guys in here, and if my friend's wife gave us all hummers while the cowboys beat the eagles, I would "like" his wife more.....I might even visit that friend more often, but respect her more? no. I'm not so superficial as to say that I'd lose all respect for her, but you have to wonder about someone's motives if they do that. I'd actually lose respect for my friend.


btw, this is a great analogy. Nothing like using real world examples to illustrate your point, radar. I know that these round robin blow jobs happen all the time. Now if I can just figure out where........

Radar, Skunks is giving you a face-saving out. Of course you were just joking. Even I, a newbie, have noticed how your posts sparkle with a dry, ironic wit.

And, LJ, your Jinx is a lucky gal. You have shown more understanding of the feminine psyche than any other man so far in this discussion. You are exactly right. At 18 most women still dream of a Prince Charming to sweep them off their feet. As we become more experienced and self confident, we become more interested in those "walks on the wild side." Also, a woman's sexual drive peaks much later than a guy's. A woman's sex drive is higher in her 30's than it was in her teens.

But back to the food vs sex thing. Is it possible to be a supper whore? If you eat, say, three meals a day does this render you debauched and does this vary for men and women? Is a man who consumes two burgers at the same time looked upon with more respect than a woman who does the same? This is the real philosophical question. Is it the action (eating, sex) that is judged or the person performing it?

That's where the man is right, and thus the struggle in dealing with some of the odder beliefs (like Radar's Guide to Chicks) that he puts forth. He's right on the Federal Reserve (which is not a federal agency and has no reserves) and the FCC anyway ... I'm all for revamping the FDA's drug approval process, but that one I think we need.

No question. Bruce and I would be having a wonderful time, carving dodads, among other activities. Radar would be bait.

Now its my turn to spew coffee all over my lap top! Thank you, Wolf, for starting my day out with a good laugh! Bruce should be flattered by this harem he's aquiring among the female side of the cellurites!:D

Reserve is more complex but the FCC? Imagine a world with no emissions control! Sure they're a bunch of asses and it needs revaming bigtime (and surgical seperation from big business) but their core purpose I see as utterly essential in the age of WiFi, cellphones and computers.

I'm sorry to interrupt but, what does the FCC have to do with sex or food? and what does FCC stand for?

THE FOOD AND COOTCHY COMMISION

Old argument with Radar a long time ago in which he stated he wanted to abolish the FCC. The FCC is the Federal Communications Commission. Their job (among other things) is to make sure that devices to not put out 'dirty' EM interference that screwed up other devices near it and assign/licence radio frequencies. These days it's a massive entity with it's fingers is pretty much everything form of media and communication.

J

Are you saying that Radar is 'dirty'?

I would not classify radar as a device.

So how would you classify him?

but would you call him a "tool"?

come on LJ, let's not fight with the other children.

well he'd make a great space heater.

No, because it's only in the cyber world. In the real world I don't collect Cellarites, just cellulite.:(

Right here. Right now. we are having a pizza party at our school in engineering class. and I say that Food is definetly more subtle and pleasurable that sex.

another mystery solved. you're looking around the room at the engineering females at your school. of course you like food better. once you make the beast with two backs with someone like .......insert hottie here....... you'll start thinking straight again

Insert hottie where???

:censored:

yeah, i might reccomend trying it with a partner before you make your final judgement

I thought at the very least when discussing the subtlety of food we were talking in terms of fine cuisine.......Pizza party in engineering class is not what sprang to my mind *chuckles*

HEY, It's food. WHAT DO YOU EXPECT? (Gosh)

But seriously, don't you all think that food is even more private than sex? I mean it in the sense that people don't share it.

ex. Which do you think would happen first in the slums of Los Angeles?

1) a whore intimidating to with someone else

or

2) a crazy person telling someone else to eat his food?

Do you mean that no one shares the individual series of sensations that your taste buds send to your brain when eating a slice of a pizza that everyone is sharing together?

Men and women don't share the same orgasms either, even if they happen to achieve a mutual one. My theory is that men must have very intense orgasms since they generally have to regroup for some amount of time before going on to the next. Women, however, get to have multiple orgasms. I have always wondered if a woman's orgasm wasn't somewhat less intense for that reason. But we'll never know since a woman can't experience what a man feels and visa versa. However, all that aside, I would hardly say that lessens the quality of the experience.

And how can you argue that PIZZA is better than sex? That's stretching it.

Are you kidding? There are precious few people in this world willing to let uninvolved parties watch them in the most personal act of fucking. I've never met a single person who had a serious problem with people watching them eat. Food is not private. Take thanksgiving, for example. A large family gathering where everyone enjoys food and drink together, and then they all pass out watching football.

Now imagine that same family involved in a depraved orgy. I'm not really going anywhere with that, just want to put the image in your head.

Anyhow. If sex were less private than food, we would have drive-thru fuckshacks. Not that I'm against that. In fact, if someone here wants to take that idea and run with it, just let me know where its located.

I think what we are really talkin about here is the act of consumption. Whne we are children, prior to discovering our sexual selves, one of the most ( if not the most) intense pleasures is the act of eating or drinking. The taste sensations, are powerful and moving. Children's stories are chock full of food. So.......eating can be an intense pleasure ( possibly why so many people use food as their "drug" of choice)

Does that explain the 67% of the U.S. population that is obese or overweight?

any whay, Food is still in the lead. don't agree? then answer me this question.

When a person goes into a bar, pub, or a club, what does he do? does he go to eat? to dance? or to hook up with some one?

Tomas, are you a virgin?

why do I hear Questions such as the above almost everyday?

Whatever happened to privacy?


the answer is up to you.

Well, we know that you eat.

that's a yes

I'll second that LJ

Not that there's anything wrong with that...

other than trying to make a comparative argument about it when you've never experienced it....with a partner

Unless you're trying to compare it to something when you have no frame of reference whatsoever.

This is something akin to me trying to compare camping to, oh, say, scuba diving. Have I been camping? Yeah, and I really like doing it. But I've never been scuba diving, so one could reasonably expect me to be unable form a proper comparison. I'm not qualified to make the blanket statement "camping is better than scuba diving". But don't let that stop you, Tomas, you stud you.

Where was I? I should have been paying attention! How could I have let something like this happen?

All I can say is this: tonight, my mind's eye will be floating dead in a pot of beef vegetable soup.

What are you doing for dinner tonight, perth?

I'm gonna fuck a bowl of macaroni and cheese. Best of both worlds!

They go to drink dumbass.

Yeah but when they have a few drinks, what do they start thinking about, food or sex?:D

Yuck. :vomit:

YEAH, I'm with monkey....what does dumbass taste like?

Very much like smartass, only gamier.

heh.. on a side note..

if the 'web' would dictate what people want more of.. look at the ratio of cooking sites to porn sites.. the ratio is overwhelmingly bent towards porn.. the main problem is that you NEED food to live, but sex makes life much more enjoyable.

and in my opinion (and I've been around the block a couple of times) is that I would rather not have sex with someone I don't like.. or have some sort of emotional bond with (however slight) other than that it's more like two people mastrubating one another.. whereas it might be enjoyable it's not quite 'right'.. on the food side, you can always cook up whatever 'comfort food' you grew up liking, and it's possibly more emotionally satisfying

yeah I do have long hair.. why do you ask :))

One of the matter is that sex is incomunicable verbally compated to food. recepies and the culinary arts have been here for thousands of years. you hear people talk about their food at the Holiday Inn or the Ritz, or other elevated cuisine.

Eating, cooking, and other cullinary arts are a form of art, it requires finesse to produce dishes of great and exquisite delicatessen and standards.

(Ex. I don't suppose y'all have had a "delicate" sex night

or

have heard the saying : yesterday night, my sex tasted like chicken.:rolleyes:

what came first, the laying or the egg?

the question is really: When was the last time that after a sex session you or your partner said that it tasted like chicken or that it was " a delicate, Subtle, and/or refreshing sex.

I can't recall the last time I heard that said about food, outside of fictional gourmand characters.

Tomas, the question is really: What the FUCK are you talking about? What does sex have to do with tasting like anything?

And if you cannot communicate verbally about sex, there's something wrong with YOU, not the act itself.

I find this especially humourous:

Anybody can have sex, but if you expect to get invited back, you had better learn some finesse.

I'm tired of listening to you argue this retarded point. You're comparing apples and oranges and it's obvious you've either never had an apple or you tried to eat it with your ear.

Re: Tomas

from his profile

Birthday May 27, 1988

Leave the kid alone..if I know anything it is how messed up you can be about these things at his age.

STILL WIPING THE TEARS AWAY.....



what? .....like a Reuben?

Is that what the kids are calling it nowadays?

I am not completely clear as to what point is being argued. Is it that food is "like" sex? Or not like sex? Or can even be compared to sex? Or any of the above swapped around? Maybe I just need to go back and reread this 12 page thread.

Yes, apples to oranges is a good way to say it because the two are on completely different levels. However, food and sex both have a discrete effect on our senses. Take foods like candy, for instance. We eat it, not out of necessity, but for enjoyment. Sometimes we eat just because we are hungry. But sometimes, people fuck or masturbate because they physically "need" to. Maybe this is a loose connection, but I think that may be the only way in which the two relate.

Or bring someone else in with some ice-cold drinks.

Or just some ice. Then you can rub it all over each other and eat it afterwards. Does that blur the debate? Is that 'food' and 'sex' at the same time? Has this issue been covered? Lets talk about it!

Catwoman still visibly enthusiastic after the group sex thread

catwoman: I was not expecting that said by you. as far as I can remember you were the first person to argue about the point.

Perth: IT'S AN INNOCENT, RIDICULOUS QUESTION THAT I ASKED!!!
and now I know why I should not have posted my B-day in.

(sighs)

and now that you know that I'm 15 going on 16, you know that I haven't experienced sex on its fullness.

O well, I thought that this website was kind of like a College or scholar forum where Big, inexplicable words roamed.

One point still remains: yesterday, I ate a pear, and I masturbated afterwards, and I believe that the pear was better

Dont take it to heart Tomas. *smiles* We're just teasing you. When you are a little older you'll understand why we all found it so funny. That aside, you raised some interesting points, you just werent truly able to compare the two yourself. hence we took umbrage ( mildly) at your seeming insistence that one is better than the other.

Seriously, there is a world of difference between masturbating and getting down and dirty with someone who presses all the right buttons and who is just dying for you to press some of hers ( or his, I'd hate to make an assumption there )

When you are a little more experienced in matters carnal, I suggest you think back to this thread and ask yourslef the same question you asked us. You may find your opinion has altered quite drastically, you may not but it would be based on a comparison of both rather than experience of one and mere fantasies of the other.
No matter how much I try to imagine the taste of chocolate ( and when I was a child on a sugar free diet I imagined this a lot) I can only capture the faintest echo of the true taste. It feels quite strong and similar to me at the time, but the instant I eat a bar of chocolate I know I have merely fooled myself into thinking that.