The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Immigration Enforcement Un-American? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=19841)

piercehawkeye45 03-26-2009 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123 (Post 549497)
If it were math or a real science... sure. In this case it is a bunch of people sitting around talking about why life is unfair.

You do realize that many of the methods of finding conclusions for sociology and science are the same...

And there is a difference between recognizing something is unfair and getting all uptight about it.

Redux 03-26-2009 08:27 AM

IMO. we need comprehensive immigration reform to move away from our current unfair "quota" system.

The vast majority of immigration visas are currently given to persons with close family (parent/child) that are US citizens, followed by those with highly valued job skills, and then a "diversity" program based on country of origin, with more slots for Europe, followed by Asia, Africa and lastly Central/South America.

If you an unskilled Mexican/Salvadoran with no family here and little education but a commitment to hard work..good luck on getting an immigration visa, other than perhaps a temp visa to be exploited as a migratory and seasonal farm worker.

Bullitt 03-26-2009 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 (Post 549547)
You do realize that many of the methods of finding conclusions for sociology and science are the same...

Sorry but there's far from a consensus in the professional/higher academic world about that. Take a historiography course sometime, it will show you some serious issues with sociology, typically focusing on the actual application of this so called science to the real world (problems with complex systems, etc.). Social theories are nice and all, but application thereof is very problematic and predicting the behavior of micro or macro levels of people groups is wrought with problems and is basically more unreliable than my old '81 VW. Don't get me wrong sociology can be useful but it's like Freud, take what you hear with a grain of salt.

xoxoxoBruce 03-26-2009 11:27 AM

Agreed Bullitt, and the older I get the less I believe it.

lookout123 03-26-2009 11:42 AM

My respect for the subject ended when I had 3 semester hours left for my minor. I had a professor who refused to let me pass the course unless I wrote a paper on the minority group I'm a part of or admit I was a racist and write a paper on that. All white people are racist, ya know. of course, he couldn't recognize his own bias because in his world white people have the power so only they can be racist. I still think he's just pissed his proper little japanese sister took up with a white boy.

piercehawkeye45 03-26-2009 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullitt (Post 549557)
Sorry but there's far from a consensus in the professional/higher academic world about that. Take a historiography course sometime, it will show you some serious issues with sociology, typically focusing on the actual application of this so called science to the real world (problems with complex systems, etc.). Social theories are nice and all, but application thereof is very problematic and predicting the behavior of micro or macro levels of people groups is wrought with problems and is basically more unreliable than my old '81 VW. Don't get me wrong sociology can be useful but it's like Freud, take what you hear with a grain of salt.

When did I say anything about application???

I made a single statement and was responded with an ad hominem attacking a straw man created from my argument. I don't get shit from any sociology class and even if I did, that doesn't invalidate my statement. I have already stated that I cannot prove or disprove my statement anyways.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123
My respect for the subject ended when I had 3 semester hours left for my minor. I had a professor who refused to let me pass the course unless I wrote a paper on the minority group I'm a part of or admit I was a racist and write a paper on that. All white people are racist, ya know. of course, he couldn't recognize his own bias because in his world white people have the power so only they can be racist. I still think he's just pissed his proper little japanese sister took up with a white boy.

You got all pissed off about semantics? Yes, the definition of racism for many is prejudice plus power because racism is a social doctrine (-ism) and people of color can very rarely force their prejudice onto our society while whites can much easier. Hell, everyone was calling Reverend Wright a racist but in reality, there is nothing he can do to force his prejudice on whites. And also, that definition is a major generalization.

On an indivdidal level, discrimination is the killer. Anyone can discriminate and whites do receive a large part of this. I have been on the short side of it, and so have many other people. Its life, tough shit (not directed at anyone).

On a sociological level, racism is the killer. But unfortunately it is nearly impossible to blame anyone for this since no one person controls it. It would be similar to blaming music videos for displaying sexism or Fox News for giving biased news. These happen because the sexist music videos and biased news sell more. So, blaming any particular person for this phenomena is absolutely pointless. That is what I disagree with most on the current idea of racism. That some people control it and force it down on people for their gain. No, it is something that just happens naturally. For whites to feel guilty about it won't do anything and usually ends up just making the problem worse.


To be honest, I don’t have much respect for sociology either along with many other fields. But, I do believe certain aspects of it are good, while its entirety can be generalized as absurd because there is no way to practically apply it. It is similar to philosophy, interesting and relevant at times, but overall pointless because of lack of applications. That is why I never said anything about application in my statement and admitted that it cannot be proved either way.

TheMercenary 03-26-2009 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123 (Post 549615)
All white people are racist, ya know.

If I had a damm nickle for every time I have heard someone tell me that I'd complete with Soros.

sugarpop 03-26-2009 05:48 PM

Wait, I thought genetics proved there is really no such thing as race. There are certain characteristics in some ethnicities, but no actual race difference, kinda like in different breeds of cats or dogs. There is only the human race.

sugarpop 03-26-2009 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redux (Post 549550)
IMO. we need comprehensive immigration reform to move away from our current unfair "quota" system.

The vast majority of immigration visas are currently given to persons with close family (parent/child) that are US citizens, followed by those with highly valued job skills, and then a "diversity" program based on country of origin, with more slots for Europe, followed by Asia, Africa and lastly Central/South America.

If you an unskilled Mexican/Salvadoran with no family here and little education but a commitment to hard work..good luck on getting an immigration visa, other than perhaps a temp visa to be exploited as a migratory and seasonal farm worker.

Well, is it really good for the country to import unskilled, illiterate people? Don't we have too many of those already?

And honestly, since we have lost so many jobs, why would we want to let more people in right now? I am all for opening the borders for more LEGAL immigrants, but not right now. After the recession is over. Right now, we need to look out for the people who are legal citizens/immigrants.

Personally, I don't think there should be ANY borders, ANYWHERE. But that will never happen.

Redux 03-26-2009 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarpop (Post 549767)
Well, is it really good for the country to import unskilled, illiterate people? Don't we have too many of those already?

And honestly, since we have lost so many jobs, why would we want to let more people in right now? I am all for opening the borders for more LEGAL immigrants, but not right now. After the recession is over. Right now, we need to look out for the people who are legal citizens/immigrants.

Personally, I don't think there should be ANY borders, ANYWHERE. But that will never happen.

sugar...my point was to the issue of bias (not racism) in the current immigration system (as well as the valued notion of "Give me your tired, your poor,. Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free..The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. .").

Take 100 foreigners who will get immigration visas....70 or so (some might be illiterate and/or unskilled) will be eligible solely because of having a close relative here.....20 or so will have highly valued or technical job skills, 5 will have reasons of political persecution...and 5 will get in on the "diversity" lottery, with Europe, Asia and Africa each having more slots then South/Central America.

IMO, this is a biased system.

sugarpop 03-26-2009 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redux (Post 549781)
sugar...my point was to the issue of bias (not racism) in the current immigration system (as well as the valued notion of "Give me your tired, your poor,. Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free..The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. .").

Take 100 foreigners who will get immigration visas....70 or so (some might be illiterate and/or unskilled) will be eligible solely because of having a close relative here.....20 or so will have highly valued or technical job skills, 5 will have reasons of political persecution...and 5 will get in on the "diversity" lottery, with Europe, Asia and Africa each having more slots then South/Central America.

IMO, this is a biased system.

If it's so unbiased, why is it predicted that by 2050 latinos will be the dominate ethnicity? I remember reading that somewhere. I don't think people should be allowed to come simply because they have relatives here. I think political persecution should top that.

TheMercenary 03-27-2009 07:14 AM

WTF?

Brazil’s leader blames white people for crisis

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ae4957e8-1...0779fd2ac.html

classicman 03-27-2009 07:59 AM

From the link:
Quote:

Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Thursday blamed the global economic crisis on “white people with blue eyes” and said it was wrong that black and indigenous people should pay for white people’s mistakes.

Speaking in Brasília at a joint press conference with Gordon Brown, the UK prime minister, Mr Lula da Silva told reporters: “This crisis was caused by the irrational behaviour of white people with blue eyes, who before the crisis appeared to know everything and now demonstrate that they know nothing.”

He added: “I do not know any black or indigenous bankers so I can only say [it is wrong] that this part of mankind which is victimized more than any other should pay for the crisis.”
Uh, yeh sure. And this guy is the President of Brazil.

Redux 03-27-2009 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarpop (Post 549824)
If it's so unbiased, why is it predicted that by 2050 latinos will be the dominate ethnicity? I remember reading that somewhere. I don't think people should be allowed to come simply because they have relatives here. I think political persecution should top that.

I don't think you read that prediction correctly.

Its more like that by 2050, non-Hispanic Whites will no longer be the majority in the US (whites will be under 50% of the pop for the first time).

Its true that Hispanics are the fastest rising ethnicity, but nowhere near a majority by 2050...more like doubling from the current 12% to about 25%.

The Asian population in the US is expected to double during that period as well.

But should that be a basis for immigration?

TheMercenary 03-27-2009 08:14 AM

Yea, damm Northern Europeans!

What about the white people with brown eyes?! Heh, what about them?

TheMercenary 03-27-2009 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redux (Post 549979)
But should that be a basis for immigration?

No.

sugarpop 03-28-2009 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redux (Post 549979)
I don't think you read that prediction correctly.

Its more like that by 2050, non-Hispanic Whites will no longer be the majority in the US (whites will be under 50% of the pop for the first time).

Its true that Hispanics are the fastest rising ethnicity, but nowhere near a majority by 2050...more like doubling from the current 12% to about 25%.

The Asian population in the US is expected to double during that period as well.

But should that be a basis for immigration?

oh ok, my bad. :blush: I just knew whites would be in the minority. I could've sworn it said latinos would be the majority. anyway...

No, I wasn't arguing that should be the basis for immigration.

sugarpop 03-28-2009 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 549946)
WTF?

Brazil’s leader blames white people for crisis

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ae4957e8-1...0779fd2ac.html

I believe he was arguing the problem started in the United States, with the "good ol' white boys club" in Wall Street, and he would be right.

xoxoxoBruce 03-28-2009 08:08 PM

Quote:

Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Thursday blamed the global economic crisis on “white people with blue eyes” and said it was wrong that black and indigenous people should pay for white people’s mistakes.
But that is what he said. I can't know what he meant, or read his mind(it would be in Portuguese anyway), I can only know what he said. And as a blue eyed white person, I take exception to his statement. :eyebrow:

sugarpop 03-28-2009 08:12 PM

I agree. it was pretty out there.

TheMercenary 03-29-2009 09:53 AM

Why doesn't he just blame the Aryan Race or Nazi Empire?

TheMercenary 04-01-2009 05:54 PM

Well there you have it.

Homeland Security Frees 27 Illegal Immigrants, Sends Them Back to Work

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512098,00.html

classicman 04-01-2009 08:20 PM

Quote:

The Feb. 24 raid of an auto parts plant in Bellingham, Wash., netted 28 illegal immigrants. While one was deported, the remaining workers were released from custody and given employment authorization documents, or EADs, in exchange for cooperating with an ongoing investigation of their employer, Yamato Engine Specialists.
Quote:

But critics say the softened policy will increase the number of illegal immigrants entering the country.

"The signal that it sends to illegal immigrants is that if you can get here, you're pretty much home free," said Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
Quote:

Criminal arrests of employers who hired illegal immigrants skyrocketed from 25 in 2002 to 1,103 in 2008. The number of deportations jumped from 485 to 5,184 over that same time period. The Obama administration has sought a freeze on immigrant arrests.

Enforcement advocates say Americans should be outraged by the government giving illegal immigrants a right to work when unemployment is so high for documented workers.

Unemployment in Whatcom County, home to the Yamato plant, has risen to 8.1 percent, and in the days after the Yamato raid, more than 150 people applied for the jobs made open by the arrests.
Too bad not one American got a job.

Clodfobble 04-02-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

and given employment authorization documents, or EADs
:lol:

classicman 04-02-2009 04:18 PM

I am ashamed of all of you - It took Clod of all people, with all she has going on, to catch that. Shame, shame, shame - You are ALL on report. Yes, you too!

xoxoxoBruce 04-03-2009 02:08 AM

:mad:

lookout123 04-03-2009 02:13 PM

Oh, that's just racist drivel Bruce.

xoxoxoBruce 04-04-2009 02:33 PM

Yeah right, it isn't like the Mexican Army, or Mexican police, are real world threats to anybody. The cartels told me so.

sugarpop 04-05-2009 10:32 AM

WTF? grrrrrr :mad:

xoxoxoBruce 04-05-2009 11:03 AM

You're beautiful when you growl, but I'm curious if you're growling at the video or comments?

sugarpop 04-05-2009 11:47 AM

Didn't watch the video yet. I am growling because they allowed illegals to stay and have jobs when the unemployment rate for LEGAL citizens is so damn high. I mean really. where the fuck are THEIR PRIORITIES? Not with Americans apparently.

lookout123 04-05-2009 11:49 AM

This isn't even about the unemployment rate. The issue should start and stop with did they follow the legal process to enter the country? If not, nothing else matters, get out.

Redux 04-05-2009 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123 (Post 553021)
This isn't even about the unemployment rate. The issue should start and stop with did they follow the legal process to enter the country? If not, nothing else matters, get out.

The legal process since the 80s (the last major immigration legislation), at least as I understand it, when the feds raid a place of employment, some (most) undocumented workers can continue to work with an employment authorization doc (ead) after the raid and until the case against the employer is adjudicated...in part, I assume, because the testimony of those undocumented workers may be needed.

If that is correct, it might seem outrageous in your opinion (or mine), but if it is the law, then either that legal process should be followed or the law should be amended.

TheMercenary 04-06-2009 02:43 AM

More often than not what they find in the raids is that the illegal immigrants have fake or stolen SSN's and or forged documents. This gives ICE a perfect reason to put them in jail.

Redux 04-06-2009 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 553194)
More often than not what they find in the raids is that the illegal immigrants have fake or stolen SSN's and or forged documents. This gives ICE a perfect reason to put them in jail.

And in some cases, it is the employer providing those fake SSNs in which case it may be reasonable for the government to offer something to the "small fry" in order to strengthen the case against the "bigger fish."

I dont necessarily agree with the current policies and procedures....just offering reasons why those employees might be given temporary EADs during the period of time in which the employer is facing criminal prosecution, and after which the employees would be subject to a deportation hearing.

TheMercenary 04-06-2009 04:39 PM

I doubt any employers found guilty of such practices have been allowed to walk. Within the last few months we had a Chinese food establishment in our city send both the husband and wife owners to jail for hiring illegal immigrants, but they had also kept them in slave like conditions.

classicman 04-14-2010 03:54 PM

bump
Quote:

Arizona lawmakers on Tuesday passed one of the toughest pieces of immigration-enforcement legislation in the country, which would make it a violation of state law to be in the U.S. without proper documentation.

It would also grant police the power to stop and verify the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being illegal.

bold mine
link

Wow. So let me get this right... If you are driving down the road and you look like you may be an immigrant, then these guys can what? Pull you over? frisk you? Whatever they want?

Pie 04-14-2010 04:09 PM

Unbelievable.

DWB just became Driving While Latino

I gotta remember to tell my mother that she's lucky to be getting out of AZ. She's far too dark-skinned to be seen in public. :right:

morethanpretty 04-14-2010 09:25 PM

My dad has been asked for his green card multiple times while on the job. He's white, just tan from working in the sun...oh and he works construction.

classicman 10-19-2010 03:26 PM

New Ad Campaign Asks Latinos Not To Vote For Congress
Quote:

WASHINGTON, Oct. 18 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Latinos for Reform announced today the launch of a national ad campaign in targeted states urging Latino voters not to vote for Members of Congress that have failed to deliver on their immigration reform promises. The ads, in both English and Spanish, are available at www.LatinosForReform.com.

"It's an election year, so perhaps we shouldn't be surprised to hear promises about immigration reform," said LFR President Robert Deposada. "What is surprising, however, is that these politicians really believe that they can continue to make these same promises during every campaign season without ever delivering on them – and that we continue to allow it."

During the 2008 elections, President Obama and the Democratic leadership made a commitment that immigration reform would be passed within a year. Two years later, these lawmakers have not only failed to deliver on this promise; they intentionally undermined even the smallest of reform efforts.

"One has to wonder: Why do the same lawmakers who decided to 'go it alone' on their political priorities like health care reform and the economic stimulus refuse to do the same on comprehensive immigration reform?" Deposada added.

"Clearly, we have been betrayed by both the Democratic and Republican leadership. And now, when they need our votes, they are at it again with more empty promises," said LFR Vice Chairman Naomi Lopez-Bauman. "If we have any chance of making our voices heard, then we must be willing to take dramatic action. This November we can send a message to all politicians: If they didn't keep their promise on immigration reform, then they can't count on our vote."

"Now is the time for us to decide what role we will play in America's political future. We are urging Latinos to be counted by casting their votes for Governor, Mayor, school board, etc. – but not to vote for Congress – on Election Day," Lopez-Bauman added. "If we sit idly by and vote for the same lawmakers that ignore us once they are in office, we will just get more of the same shabby treatment. If, however, we don't vote for politicians who don't deliver on the promises they make to our communities, then they will be forced to stop taking our support for granted."
Latinos for Reform
SOURCE
BOLD MINE
Ouch thats gonna hurt... if it works.

Happy Monkey 10-19-2010 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 688948)



I wasn't sure where to put this. I figure this is a good a place as any.


classicman 10-19-2010 08:32 PM


xoxoxoBruce 10-19-2010 10:12 PM

:lol: Latinos for Reform is a Republican front group. They're hoping as many people don't vote as possible.

SamIam 10-19-2010 10:35 PM

Sometimes I wonder why any of us bother to vote anymore. If you have the money you can buy your very own congressman, and if you don't have the money, fear not - somebody will buy him, probably a large international corporation like Halliburten.

The voters just play along with this, and no one states the obivious - that the emperor has no clothes.

Call me cynical, but I am just a realist.

Look what are political system has degenerated into - lots of partisan rhetoric combined with political deadlock.

Politicians just play both ends against the middle and add up their offshore bank accounts when no one is around. They couldn't care less about immigration reform because its impact on the wealthy is negligible at best. :eyebrow:

xoxoxoBruce 10-19-2010 10:36 PM

At least you're not bitter. ;)

SamIam 10-19-2010 10:44 PM

Just call me Rebecca of Sunnybrook farm. :right:

tw 10-19-2010 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamIam (Post 689138)
Call me cynical, but I am just a realist.

Look what are political system has degenerated into - lots of partisan rhetoric combined with political deadlock.

This is what Alito and Roberts said is good when they also said their Court was not doing judicial activision.

Fortunately I have a remote control. Within the first two second of any political ad, the channel is changed. In part, because I know 40% of the population will believe those ads. It is why my father so enjoyed manipulating people with lies. And said the FTC took the fun out of it when they demanded honesty.

Well, the press is hyping a referendum in CA that would legalize marijuana. However the most important referendum is one that would attack gerrymandering - a major reason why extremists have turned politics so nasty. For example, if you live in Southern IL's 15th Congressional district. Then drive for hours north almost to Chicago. That is also your congressional district. The Republicans are already planning to do same in Indiana where 2010 Census data will require redistricting.

Did you know Crossroads GPS and American Crossroads - two major campaign advertisers - are Karl Rove? Americans for Job Security is the entire Insurance industry promoting only Republican candidates. Americans for Prosperity are the billionaire Koch brothers also promoting only for Republicans.

Or Meg Whitman who spent $120 million (plus more $millions in campaign donations from everyone else) against Jerry Brown who only has $11 million in CA governor race. The Supreme Court said only those who have the most money are permitted to have the most voice. And anybody is allowed to make false accusations - and not have their name attached to those accusations. That is also now legal. With so many extremists in power, nasty is what they want our government to become. And this is only round one. It will get nastier every two years. Those with the most bucks will learn every year how much more lying is legal - especially when those lies can now be promoted without your name attached to it. Alito and Roberts said this is fair and good.

The Economist on 7 Oct noted gerrymandering results in
Quote:

fewer seats changing hands on election day, this tends to shift the focus of politics away from the general election itself, and on to the primaries in which the parties select their candidates. The turnout in primaries is tiny, typically only between 10% and 20% of voters, and tends to be disproportionately composed of activists. So those selected tend to be politically slanted to the left or the right extremes.

California’s sadly dysfunctional government has suffered from this extremism: it is one reason why the moderate Arnold Schwarzenegger has got so little done.
Well things have become so bad that the average German who once drank 142 liters of beer annually is now only drinking 107 liters. Germany is now only the fifth largest beer drinking nation. And still there was a hops shortage last year. Nasty American politics can have world wide consequences.

classicman 10-20-2010 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 689136)
:lol: Latinos for Reform is a Republican front group. They're hoping as many people don't vote as possible.

Univision pulled the ads.

TheMercenary 10-21-2010 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamIam (Post 689138)
Look what are political system has degenerated into - lots of partisan rhetoric combined with political deadlock.

You haven't even begun to see deadlock yet...

Shawnee123 10-21-2010 09:18 AM

He said, as he beat his chest mightily.

TheMercenary 10-21-2010 09:20 AM

I will the first in line to laugh and point after the elections.

Shawnee123 10-21-2010 09:25 AM

You're a parody. I'm already pointing and laughing! :lol:

TheMercenary 10-21-2010 09:27 AM

The whole damm system is dysfunctional. It is broken beyond repair. I don't see it getting better until we have a viable third party.

I am hold up a mirror for you.

Shawnee123 10-21-2010 09:28 AM

DAmn I'm fucking GORGEOUS (flips hair and smiles intoxicatingly.)

TheMercenary 10-21-2010 09:29 AM

:D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.