You really want the love sausage, don't you JB. Don't feel shamed about it, everybody has their kink.

Oh, yes. He wants to ride the Cumberland express but feels that standing in the ticket queue exposes him to the glaring eyes of the world. Go for it JB. Become that sausage jockey, weigh anchor at poo bay. See if anyone cares...

Somewhere klyde posted about smashing a woman's face or somesuch

RE: his sausage desires

Bang(h)ers and mash?

bitch this ain't "homo recruit" this is destroy homo's///

Is that what they're caling it these days?

Camille is a local girl, a very interesting lesbian writer.

What is her position on sausages?

Last I knew, anti-sausage in sex but not in life generally.

I'm not sure. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't her view on things give me more time for gardening and cooking?

I'm just trying not to be bias I don't wan't to give a one sided oppion on something I won't even try.. and believe me I won't..

You know, not to be too paranoid or anything, but why do I think that just by having that statement out there on the Internet, a small check mark was made in an electronic file somewhere? That there is some kind of counter that automatically produces a wiretap request when it hits 500.:right:

Anyway, I divide religious people into two categories, those that mostly internalize religion and those that mostly externalize religion. Those that internalize religion apply the ethos and/or doctrine mostly to themselves, measuring their success in how they meet the ideals of there religion. Those that externalize religion measure their success in how they can encourage/cajole/coerce/judge others on how they meet the ideals of the individuals religion, even if the people being judged are not members of that religion. The categories can be subdivided into adherence to the spirit or the letter of religious law.

Gay marriage is a perfect example. The argument that by allowing gay marriage, heterosexual marriage is somehow being spoiled for it's adherents is an external religious argument. It's like saying that members of the middle class should not be allowed to own Mercedes automobiles because doing so would cheapen the experience for the wealthy. The short answer to the car argument is that if some rich people are a*holes enough to feel that way, then there is an almost moral imperative to f*k with them by making sure it happens. Works for the marriage argument too.:cool:

Stop spouting hate, klyde. Just stop. You've fantasized about smashing women's faces in and now are talking 'destroy homo's (sic)'. Are you going for a hate hat trick?

I'm starting to think you're a troll. You're a little too organized and coherent in your hateful communications. The clanging, the word salad, all of your other pseudo-psychotic babble can be imitated. I think sexobon's right to call you out.

pseudo-psychotic babble

I warned you not to try and do the WRONG thing with me.. calling someone who is not gay.. a homo and playing mind games and not taking me seriously and saying I want sausage in my buttok is NOT want I want so don't go playing the Hate card when I get pissed because you can't handle a hedrosexual man acting like someone who thinks homo's are the psycho.. your twisted you concept of love is so demented that you think me getting mad at homos for trying to rape me is something bad..

Who are you even talking to? You're not making any sense.