rkzenrage |
12-19-2006 11:40 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayMcGee
mmmm.... One the one hand, it does cast our serial killers in a better light, in that without the ready access to fire-arms, they have to work harder to co-erce/cajole the victims into the life-threatening situation. And then of course there's the method of despatch itself... without fire-arms, one has to be much more inventive. Strike one more for the Brits (and Aussies). I guess that the readily and widespread availablity of guns in the US has, to a large extent, removed the elegance and originality from homicide as it is practised in the USA.
|
He was a cop, he could have gotten an fire-arm if he chose to. Most serial killers in the US don't use them. I can only think of one that used them to get their victims to cooperate. They don't like them... not "personal" enough.
Trying to make this a gun discussion won't work.
They don't use them. If anything it would show that an armed populace would be better served to protect themselves.
However, I just don't see why it is really relevant to this discussion. The laws are the way they are and the poor people are dead and we need to focus on that.
More, openly, legalized prostitution with safer access for them and safer places to practice their jobs would help with this immensely.
We must remove our puritanical ideas from sex, it is a sickness that is killing people like this, with abuse and STDs every day all over the world.
|