I think the only thing that concerns Disney, is how each incident is perceived by the target audience and effects their bottom line. They'd probably have both those girls, spread eagle naked, if that's what the public demanded for their money.

Absolutely. And Miley's dad, Billy Ray Has-been, would conveniently be missing for that part of the shoot as well. He has no problem ho-ing out his daughter. Not that I think the pics are all that bad, but it doesn't seem the road Miley should take at this point in her career.

That's probably true Bruce. It puzzles me how we demand that our 11-16 year old crowd remain virginal... and then the moment they're 17 or 18, we want them to be instantly Britney-esque, so we have some new meat. Seems interesting, since Americans are kinda viewed to be uptight about anything erotic. I mostly just feel bad for Miley, because heck, when I was sixteen I probably did a lot of stupid things that would have looked really bad if the media were hounding me!!

Let's just call it an early investment on the future. My friends all looked at me like a sicko when I told them that the coach's daughter in Remember The Titans was gonna be a smoking hottie. Who'd she turn out to be? Hayden Panettiere.

Although in all honesty, I can see Miley going the way of Tiffany, fading into "Bolivian" and then doing a Playboy shoot when she's 33.

disney shouldnt be selling underwear. why do they have to sell underwear? what does disney have to do with underwear? if they are going to sell it., they dont need to advertise it. especially with models. its just wrong....

where is our common sense?

Personally, I'm more fine with Minnie Mouse panties from Disney than "Who Needs Credit Cards?" panties from Wal-Mart...