The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Mosque at 51 Park Place, NY, NY (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=23158)

spudcon 07-20-2010 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 671493)
She wasn't talking to a building she was talking to moderate muslims . . . not that it really matters. (see below)

Yup and if the R's select her as their candidate then I am getting the BEST :tinfoil: and going 100% conspiracy theorist cuz thats as good as giving the election away. (not that I'm impressed by any other candidate they have to offer)

As opposed to Obama or Biden? :rolleyes:

Happy Monkey 07-20-2010 04:13 PM

Obviously.

Urbane Guerrilla 07-27-2010 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pico and ME (Post 671488)
Its just too silly and shows an impressive narrow mindedness to agree with Palins assessment. Shes an idiot.

Nah. The narrowmindedness is all on the anti-Palin side. Were you not a dreadful troglodyte you might have perceived that. Leftism makes you blind.

Urbane Guerrilla 07-27-2010 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigV (Post 671596)
I doubt you'll get a substantive answer. Ever.

To a rhetorical question, however good and fucking? :3eye:

Pete Zicato 07-27-2010 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla (Post 673067)
Leftism makes you blind.

And rightism makes you stupid.

No wonder politics is so messy.

BigV 07-27-2010 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla (Post 673068)
To a rhetorical question, however good and fucking? :3eye:

yes.

why not? you deal in rhetoric *all* the time, now you're shy?

as i said, a substative answer to this substantive question is probably not coming soon. What did you used to call that kind of double standard? Oh yeah... moral equivalence.

Sundae 07-28-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla (Post 673067)
Leftism makes you blind.

If I represent Leftism then you are incorrect. But then if you represent Rightism, I have nothing to worry about.

In truth, I'm a fool for even replying. But I think that is down to me as a person, regardless of social class, political ideology, genetic makeup or upbringing.

Rising to a bait that obvious must be a sign of evolution.
<flap,flap,sigh>

Lamplighter 07-31-2010 06:09 PM

NY Times 7/31/10
Bold for emphasis added by me.

Quote:

An influential Jewish organization on Friday announced its opposition to a proposed Islamic center and mosque two blocks north of ground zero in Lower Manhattan, intensifying a fierce national debate about the limits of religious freedom and the meaning of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

The decision by the group, the Anti-Defamation League, touched off angry reactions from a range of religious groups, which argued that the country would show its tolerance and values by welcoming the center near the site where radical Muslims killed about 2,750 people.
<snip>
Quote:

Oz Sultan, the programming director for the center, said the complex was based on Jewish community centers and Y.M.C.A.’s in Manhattan.
It is to have a board composed of Muslim, Christian and Jewish leaders and is intended to create a national model of moderate Islam.

“We are looking to build bridges between faiths,” Mr. Sultan said in an interview.
<snip>
Quote:

City officials, particularly Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, have forcefully defended the project on the grounds of religious freedom, saying that government has no place dictating where a house of worship is located. The local community board has given overwhelming backing to the project, and the city’s landmarks commission is expected to do the same on Tuesday.
For me, this action by the ADL is short sighted, and says "Don't discriminate against us, but do discriminate against them"
It's another example of "puking on your own reputation".

tw 07-31-2010 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lamplighter (Post 673787)
For me, this action by the ADL is short sighted,

Let's pass a simple law. All mosques and synagogues must be adjacent buildings - or close their doors. No more problems. Best way to deal with the hate than causes this thread to exist.

TheMercenary 08-01-2010 07:24 AM

Let them build it... then we can crash a plane into it.

Lamplighter 08-01-2010 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 673853)
Let them build it... then we can crash a plane into it.

Is that supposed to be funny... I think, NOT

TheMercenary 08-01-2010 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lamplighter (Post 673884)
Is that supposed to be funny.

No, not at all.

tw 08-01-2010 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 673893)
No, not at all.

Such actions are how extremist promote more hate and gain power. He wasn't joking. Extremists wish for such events.

TheMercenary 08-01-2010 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 673905)
Such actions are how extremist promote more hate and gain power. He wasn't joking. Extremists wish for such events.

Given the statements you said about my wife I would fully support a plane crashing into your house as well.

classicman 08-01-2010 05:51 PM

Not to change the subject from the same old broken records, but does anyone really know where the money to build this is coming from? I've read and heard different things.

TheMercenary 08-01-2010 05:59 PM

Considering the closed method of money transfer in the Islamic world I am sure it would be difficult to follow the money trail. Sort of like following the money trail of a Synagogue, the donors are hidden.

Shawnee123 08-02-2010 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 673853)
Let them build it... then we can crash a plane into it.

One can only hope you're a pilot. :right:

Even bringing up something tw said about a zillion years ago didn't divert this post from being one of the most hateful things I've ever read, and not just toward the muslims: it was quite disrespectful to 9/11 survivors as well. I was going to ignore the ugliness, but hey, you know me.

I think merc just likes to *shock* us. :shocking:

Keep up the good work, you good man deep down inside.

wanderer 08-04-2010 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 673920)
Considering the closed method of money transfer in the Islamic world I am sure it would be difficult to follow the money trail. Sort of like following the money trail of a Synagogue, the donors are hidden.

Agreed, they are in fact having a complete network system to transfer even a single penny according to one article I read some time ago. It will be more like trying to find sand in sand...........until/unless there is a sabotage.

Lamplighter 08-04-2010 08:05 PM

I believe Mayor Bloomberg made a heroic statement here....

Bold is mine.


Quote:

<snip>
...The simple fact is this building is private property, and the owners have a right to use the building as a house of worship.

The government has no right whatsoever to deny that right - and if it were tried, the courts would almost certainly strike it down as a violation of the U.S. Constitution. Whatever you may think of the proposed mosque and community center, lost in the heat of the debate has been a basic question - should government attempt to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on private property based on their particular religion? That may happen in other countries, but we should never allow it to happen here. This nation was founded on the principle that the government must never choose between religions, or favor one over another.
The World Trade Center Site will forever hold a special place in our City, in our hearts. But we would be untrue to the best part of ourselves - and who we are as New Yorkers and Americans - if we said 'no' to a mosque in Lower Manhattan.
Quote:

Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11 and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values - and play into our enemies' hands - if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists - and we should not stand for that.

For that reason, I believe that this is an important test of the separation of church and state as we may see in our lifetime - as important a test - and it is critically important that we get it right.

abbyd 08-05-2010 01:54 PM

Mayor Bloomberg is right, but I wish those Muslims would consider that going against popular sentiment doesn't help their cause much. If the majority are offended, they are right to express their opposition.

The telling thing is, there might be protests, but there won't be murders and bombs and such, as there would be in certain other countries... I think it'll be a symbol of tolerance, though I count myself as one who is offended by it at the same time.

xoxoxoBruce 08-06-2010 02:28 AM

Quote:

The telling thing is, there might be protests, but there won't be murders and bombs and such, as there would be in certain other countries...
Hopefully.

tw 08-06-2010 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abbyd (Post 674728)
I think it'll be a symbol of tolerance, though I count myself as one who is offended by it at the same time.

So what would you say had bin Laden been a computer scientist? Would you ban all computer stores from lower Manhattan?

11 September was not about Islam. It was 100% about bin Laden and his organization - Al Qaeda. Nothing more. You should only be offended by one thing. The American president all but protected bin Laden. Even disbanned Alec Station. Let bin Laden run free. Killed 4000 good American soldiers conducting war on a mythical enemy - while letting bin Laden run free.

If anything should offend you, it is George Jr's picture anywhere on the island of Manhattan.

Every light was flashing red. He even had a memo on his desk warning of the threat. And he did nothing – both before and after 11 September. That it is THE most offensive. He even let bin Laden run free. Then his political extremist propaganda machine invents and blames Islamofascism. That is also far more offensive.

classicman 08-06-2010 01:20 PM

Bin Laden reportedly died in the early 2000's. Apparently from some heart or kidney issue.

Undertoad 08-06-2010 01:24 PM

Now that they have Park Place, if they get Boardwalk we'll really be screwed.

Pete Zicato 08-06-2010 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 674888)
Now that they have Park Place, if they get Boardwalk we'll really be screwed.

:lol:

Sundae 08-06-2010 02:58 PM

UT, you know when the Monopoly Board Bombers start, you're gonna be hauled in for questioning, right?

Except isn't the US version based in Atlantic City or something?
Ours is based in London, and while it misses obvious targets (excuse the language) like Downing Street, it's would certainly close down the rest of London. Kings Cross is one of the stations for example. Although oddly - no-one seems to agree where the Angel Islington actually is. Perhaps a joke by the makers - I certainly had a username "Islington" for a while, because obviously I am an angel. Until people from North London started to make assumptions. Never trust a North Londoner. Sez my Dad.

Undertoad 08-06-2010 03:37 PM

I had not thought of the international implications!

Yes, the original is based on street names in A.C.

Happy Monkey 08-06-2010 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae Girl (Post 674916)
Ours is based in London, and while it misses obvious targets (excuse the language) like Downing Street, it's would certainly close down the rest of London. Kings Cross is one of the stations for example. Although oddly - no-one seems to agree where the Angel Islington actually is. Perhaps a joke by the makers - I certainly had a username "Islington" for a while, because obviously I am an angel. Until people from North London started to make assumptions. Never trust a North Londoner. Sez my Dad.

Ever read or see "Neverwhere"? A lot of old tube stations make appearances.

TheMercenary 08-06-2010 08:38 PM

SO the Imam of this place is totally anti-american and blame the US for 9/11. Nice....


And the people of NYC should support him because?

TheMercenary 08-06-2010 09:23 PM

This guy frigging nails it...

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/06/pa...surprised.html

gvidas 08-06-2010 10:03 PM

Is there an argument against the project that isn't rooted in a fairly fundamental discomfort with Islam?

Not only is it going to be a fairly architecturally ambiguous project (minaret-free, as it were), the mosque is actually going to be fairly far, in an urban sense, from ground zero.

Lamplighter 08-06-2010 10:15 PM

I'm posting this because I feel exactly the same about the Anti Defamation League and it's recent decision about the Mosque...

Fareed Zakaria's Letter to the ADL


Quote:

Dear Mr. Foxman,
Five years ago, the ADL honored me with its Hubert Humphrey First Amendment Freedoms Prize. I was delighted and moved to have been chosen for it in good measure because of the high esteem in which I hold the ADL. I have always been impressed by the fact that your mission is broad – “to put an end forever to unjust and unfair discrimination against and ridicule of any sect or body of citizens” – and you have interpreted it broadly over the decades. You have fought discrimination against all religions, races, and creeds and have built a well-deserved reputation.

<snip>

I cannot in good conscience hold onto the award or the honorarium that came with it and am returning both. I hope that it might add to the many voices that have urged you to reconsider and reverse your position on this issue.* This decision will haunt the ADL for years if not decades to come. Whether or not the center is built, what is at stake here is the integrity of the ADL and its fidelity to its mission. Admitting an error is a small price to pay to regain your reputation.

classicman 08-06-2010 11:11 PM

I wonder how long it will take Fareed to admit his.

Lamplighter 08-07-2010 01:22 AM

???

You know something about him that I should know ?

tw 08-07-2010 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 674978)

Wow. Saudis. UN. IslamoNazis. German Nazis. The Koran. All have conspired in an axis of evil to destroy America. Pat Condell told us - it must be true.

Pat Condell forgot to dress in his white 'glory suit', ignite a cross, and salute the Imperial Wizard before recording a tirade endorsed by TheMercenary. Wow. One could not ask for a more racist hate speech. The only word he forgot to use to describe Muslims was nigger.

As an extremist, he even 'proved' the UN has conspired with Islam to destroy America.

Why are Islam and 11 Sept related? The enemy is bin Laden and Al Qaeda. A terrorist organization based in hate. Why are so many upset? Because wackos have successfully got so many blaming Islam for 11 Sept. Same logic from George Jr also blamed Saddam so that George Jr could waste the lives of 4000 American soldiers.

At what point does everyone associate 11 September with real enemies? bin Laden. Wackos have so many blaming Islam for 11 September. Wackos, who all but protected bin Laden and who gain power by promoting hate, need us to hate Muslims. And so many oblige.

Wackos have again spun us into lying to ourselves. 11 Sept is about bin Laden; not about Islam. And bin Laden is not building a mosque.

Better is to have everyone ask the only relevant question when 11 September is mentioned. When do we get bin Laden? Wackos hope you never ask that question. Wackos gain power through hate; by blaming Muslims. By endorsing Pat Condell's bigotry.

xoxoxoBruce 08-07-2010 02:53 AM

Yeah, 9-11 was bin Laden's doing, but there were plenty of radical Muslims in the middle east and Indonesia that didn't like us, because of our support for Israel. This gave bin Laden a large pool to recruit from, and funding too.
Then invading Iraq gave them the chance to turn to moderate Muslims and say, see, see, I told you so, which really fucked things up.

Read the story of Abd el-Kader, whom Elkader, Iowa, was named after... the only Arab to be so honored.

via

Sundae 08-07-2010 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 674931)
Ever read or see "Neverwhere"? A lot of old tube stations make appearances.

But of course. I think I've bought everything ever published by Neil Gaiman, many more than once (as presents). I've been keeping him in the gothic style to which he has become accustomed for years now.

But, yes, I had completely forgotten about his Angel Islington.
And d'ya know what? I never knew it started as a TV show. When it was released on DVD a while back I avoided it out of principle, assuming it could never be as good as the book! Fool. Next, someone will be telling me the Iain Banks' The Crow Road was worth watching...

Anyway, back to Muslims and mosques an all that.

Griff 08-07-2010 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae Girl (Post 675017)

Anyway, back to Muslims and mosques an all that.

I'd just as soon talk about Neverwhere as get into another hate fest. Good book. Lil' Pete's English teacher assigned M is for Magic to her class two years back.

classicman 08-07-2010 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 675007)
The enemy is bin Laden

At what point does everyone associate 11 September with real enemies? bin Laden. Wackos, who all but protected bin Laden
11 Sept is about bin Laden;
And bin Laden is not building a mosque.

When do we get bin Laden?

Again - Bin Laden reportedly died in the early 2000's. Apparently from some heart or kidney issue.

Shawnee123 08-07-2010 09:35 AM

He reportedly owns Snapple, too.

:lol:

Pete Zicato 08-07-2010 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 675031)
I'd just as soon talk about Neverwhere as get into another hate fest. Good book. Lil' Pete's English teacher assigned M is for Magic to her class two years back.

I can also recommend Gaiman's "The Graveyard Book". Mrs. Z got it for her tween students, but I got to read it before it went off to school. I liked the old-fashioned folk-tale feel to the story. The characters were memorable and the plot was well done.

Griff 08-08-2010 11:24 AM

Will check that out.

tw 08-08-2010 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 675040)
He reportedly owns Snapple, too.

Careful. Classicman will also quote you as a source.

classicman 08-08-2010 02:41 PM

Quoting oneself was learned from tw.

TheMercenary 08-08-2010 08:13 PM

http://crazycrashes.files.wordpress....new-york-2.jpg

TheMercenary 08-08-2010 08:15 PM

http://www.FrumForum.com/wp-content/...g_from_wtc.jpg

TheMercenary 08-08-2010 08:16 PM

http://www.FrumForum.com/wp-content/...rs_on_fire.jpg

tw 08-08-2010 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 675212)
Quoting oneself was learned from tw.

Inventing lies to promote fear. So necessary for wackos to achieve power. Where are those Saddam WMDs? What does the party line say?

The CIA chief in an interview maybe one year ago said he does not know where bin Laden is. He is probably in Pakistan. And was known to be alive some years ago. As long as bin Laden runs free, wacko extremists must invent his death. Otherwise they must admit why bin Laden runs free. .

Classicman just posted that bin Laden was selling the best thing on earth! Then he deleted it. Did he mean terrorism or Snapple? Terrorism is the best thing on earth for extremists. It promote hate.

Be careful what you tell extremists. They will quote anything that promotes their political agenda.

Sponge Bob is no longer wearing square pant. Bob must be gay. Gays conspired with Saddam to attack the WTC? And bin Laden is dead. More tales from an extremist’s crypt. Amazing the nonsense an extremist will post to promote hate. And to take cheap shots at Obama.

TheMercenary 08-08-2010 09:13 PM

http://theodoresworld.net/pages/september11.htm

classicman 08-08-2010 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 675250)
The CIA chief in an interview maybe one year ago said he does not know where bin Laden is. He is probably in Pakistan. And was known to be alive some years ago. As long as bin Laden runs free, wacko extremists must invent his death. Otherwise they must admit why bin Laden runs free.

Bin Laden is most likely dead. Why would the head of the CIA not admit that? Think about it. Easy answer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 675250)
Classicman just posted that bin Laden was selling the best thing on earth! Then he deleted it.

Completely FALSE! Ask a Mod.
Quote:

Be careful what you tell extremists. They will quote anything that promotes their political agenda.
True

TheMercenary 08-08-2010 09:18 PM

Tw spouts:
Quote:

Be careful what you tell extremists. They will quote anything that promotes their political agenda.
Which is why this Nazi spouts off the party line of the Obama/Pelosi Cabal. Drink the water scumbag.....

classicman 08-08-2010 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 675258)

Perhaps you'd have more support if you could link the two issues.

TheMercenary 08-08-2010 09:23 PM

http://www.thefranchise.net/911/imag...ne2-crash2.jpg

TheMercenary 08-08-2010 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 675263)
Perhaps you'd have more support if you could link the two issues.

Are you talking about TW, the scumbag who said those things about my wife?

Undertoad 08-08-2010 09:48 PM

that's enough now

classicman 08-08-2010 10:29 PM

I was talking in general about the position thats been debated about the connection between the 9/11 extremists being the posterboys for islam.

Should there be a mosque there? I don't really like it. If I had my choice, no. But where then does the line get drawn? 10 blocks? 1 mile? 5 miles??? There is no clear answer.

On the other hand there are those that see everything Muslim as bad. I disagree with that point of view as well.

There are those who see all of Islam as bad. I disagree with this too.

There are those who claim that "they" are treating this like a dog marking its territory. Spain is used to support this position. If thats the case ... well I won't go there.
Still others say they are using our laws and freedoms against us and this is a grand conspiracy... uh ok.

If, and its a big if, this mosque is part of or funded by those who perpetrated the 9/11 attack, then I think there should be a clear link drawn and the project refused. I have, as of yet, not seen that link.

piercehawkeye45 08-09-2010 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 675276)
If, and its a big if, this mosque is part of or funded by those who perpetrated the 9/11 attack, then I think there should be a clear link drawn and the project refused. I have, as of yet, not seen that link.

I doubt that would ever happen because this is one of the situations where the problem pretty much solves itself.

If the people running the mosque has any legitimate connections with terrorists, the CIA and FBI would (hopefully) be down the their asses instantly. If you run a mosque two blocks from ground zero you basically are painting a very big target on you.

classicman 08-09-2010 09:32 AM

Quote:

"Will the victims of an atrocity that happened a few blocks away be distressed?"
Obviously the answer here is yes, but that question is not at the heart of the issue.
In general, zoning decisions based are not made based upon who will be offended, and if Islam were not involved here, I'm sure it wouldn't even be a consideration.

The basic question, which precedes any questions of policy, is "Would it be consistent with American or NYC law to discriminate against a particular religion in zoning decisions?"

Sundae 08-09-2010 10:10 AM

2 Attachment(s)
What do photos prove? Really?
Clinton shook Gerry Adams' hand.
Yeah, he was a DEMONCRAT, but he was also an American President. Should we raze Catholic Churches to the ground?

Omagh
Manchester

Sundae 08-09-2010 10:11 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Manchester again, and Deal


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.