She wouldn't let principles get in the way of profits. :haha:

Funny, I would have expected Coulter to bite O'Reilly's head off;she doesn't strike me as the type who would put up with mashers,even if they might share her ideology.

I wish you could have seen it. She had that Dan Quayle 'deer in headlights' look. She was stunned and probably offended, but she doesn't have her own show and O'Reilly is part of her bread and butter.

O'Reilly was right about one thing. In my opinion, she does look like some sort of neo-conservative dominatrix ("say free markets, you liberal worm!" WHACK! :scream: ) on the cover of her book. :D

I'd still do her though, adam's apple, man hands and all.

Someone has to stand up to the challenge.

Pooh, you just want the braggin' rights. :king:

A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do.

Yeah, but no man has to do THAT.

Funny,she looks more to me like the third-place finisher in a Trish Status look-alike contest.

Hey UT . . .
 

Was just wondering if you liked the latest shot of Ann on the cover of Time?

You can dress up a pig...

Dude, I'm sorry, she's hot. That dressed for summer one is especially nice.

Hot, but hurts America.

are we talking about the same anne coulter? after reading this thread i've looked at several different photos trying to pick up the "hot" vibe... it's not happening. she just looks like an average chick (which is fine) but when you combine that with her psychotic bitch personality - game off.

michelle malkin is is pretty fine though.

Some people go for the "crazy eyes" look.

in college i dated for short period of time a beautiful girl with the "crazy eyes". only to find out they were amirror to a crazy soul. i still miss that girl but she was absolutely effing nuts.

Luckily for them, most people who think Colter's hot won't ever have to personally deal with her crazy soul. But seeing her on the news is close...:worried:

[PEDANTIC]If her eyes were a mirror to a crazy soul, the crazy soul was yours. More likely you meant they were a WINDOW to one. [/PEDANTIC]

yes. thank you for pointing out my errors. of course, i was crazy for ever dating her in the first place, so i guess it does work both ways.

as they say, you can't fuck a crazy girl sane.
More's the pity.

i was just trying to prove them wrong. have i mentioned i still miss her? only sometimes though.

I'm sure you had fun trying.

I think she and I could be best girlfriends. We could hang out and have slumber parties and do each other's hair and talk about boys and go down to the dump to shoot rats.

I'd never heard of Ann Coulter before this site. Wonder why she gets everyone's backs up so much. I mean, yes, she seems incredibly annoying and wrong but why does that matter? Anyway, you can fuck a crazy girl sane. I am always more rational and receptive after a good rogering.

I think it has to do with appearances. It's the same reason Clarence Thomas (a conservative black judge on the Supreme Court) used to get people way more riled up than other conservatives with comparable views. He's black, so people who disagreed with him saw his conservativism as not just wrong, but as a slap in the face, an affront to their stereotypes.

Same with Ann Coulter: usually women in politics aren't hot, both because they tend to be older and because I think politics wears people down. The fact that this rhetoric is coming from someone they find attractive (personally, I don't see it, I think she's creepy-looking) is gut-wrenching, and they feel betrayed by her beauty--so they end up hating her much more than they would if she looked like Phyllis Schlafly.

Mmm good point. I think men get a little confused by attractiveness - all they see to start with is that she's female, not fat and not bald. This means they would like to have sex with her. She is considered especially attractive if she wears few clothes and agrees to doctored poses for magazines. Doesn't really matter whether she actually is good looking, the fantasy remains.

It wouldn't if she weren't a regular guest on Fox News, and covered as if her views were reasonable. In a country where people still think Hussein was involved in 9-11, and are now starting to think he may have been involved with the Oklahoma City bombing, we don't need more crazy people to be legitimized on the "news".

Here's a (perhaps a bit biased ;) ) site with a few things she's said that for some reason haven't caused her to be dropped from Fox.

What makes you think a site named AntiCoulter.com would be biased? :lol2:

Perhaps it's an expression of affection from a niece or nephew.

I don't think that author meant it as a compliment.

UT's wasn't the most complimentary thing I've read either...

No, but much classier and more humorous. ;)

oh does she? Where? :mg:

Anne Coulter's Latest Publicity Stunt

When their husbands were killed on 9/11, four New Jersey widows tried to find out why - and now no-holds-barred conservative pundit Ann Coulter is mercilessly denouncing them as "witches."

"I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much," Coulter writes in her new book.

Her brutal words were challenged yesterday on national television by "Today" host Matt Lauer - and she was slammed by the widows she derided as self-absorbed, limelight-seeking "harpies."

"I'd like her to meet my daughter and tell her how anyone could enjoy their father's death," said Kristen Breitweiser, one of four widows known as the "Jersey Girls."

"She sounds like a very disturbed, unraveled person," added Breitweiser.

In "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," the uncompromisingly right-wing Coulter writes the Jersey Girls have no right to criticize President Bush or any of the failures that led to the terror attacks.

"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis," Coulter writes.

"And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy. . .

"These self-obsessed women seemed genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them."

Breitweiser, Lorie Van Auken, Mindy Kleinberg and Patty Casazza bonded after their husbands died on 9/11, leaving them with seven children and a desire for answers.

They pushed to create the 9/11 commission, which put out a scathing report criticizing the Clinton and Bush administrations for not taking the terrorist threat more seriously - and found New York's emergency response system wasn't prepared for a serious attack.

"Our ports have not been secured. Our borders have not been secured. We still haven't caught [Osama] Bin Laden," Van Auken said yesterday. "She's not even talking about what we were talking about. She's just attacking."

The Jersey Girls - or, as Coulter calls them, "the Witches of East Brunswick" - have been criticized before, but never like this. Van Auken told the Daily News she was stunned by the vitriol.

"Having my husband burn alive in a building brought me no joy," she said. "Watching it unfold on national TV and .seeing it repeated endlessly was beyond what I could describe. Telling my children they would never see their father again was not fun. And we had no plans to divorce."

When Lauer grilled Coulter about the book, she yelled at him so harshly that gasps echoed through Rockefeller Center - and then she made a wisecrack about CBS-bound former host Katie Couric.

"If you lose a husband, you no longer have the right to have a political point of view?" Lauer asked.

As the exchange grew tense, Coulter said, "Look, you're getting testy with me."

She later added: "Hey, where's Katie? Did she leave or something?"

Last night, Coulter didn't back down from bashing the 9/11 widows. "These women got paid. They ought to take their money and shut up about it," Coulter said on MSNBC's "The Situation with Tucker Carlson."

Coulter made headlines in the past when she called for blowing up The New York Times Building, advocated forcing Muslims to become Christians and wrote an entire book that said every American liberal is guilty of treason.

Her controversial writings have made her a best-selling .author and syndicated columnist and put her on the cover of Time magazine. She's made big bucks in the process, buying a $1.5 million condo on the upper East Side.

Politicians of both parties denounced Coulter's comments.

"It's totally inhumane to be saying things like this about people who went through such agony," said Rep. Pete King (R-L.I.).

"It seems that she's just full of anger and hate," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-Manhattan), who held a news conference yesterday with relatives of 9/11 victims on the country's failure to improve security.

"Like an insecure child, it's always been clear that Ann Coulter is prepared to do anything to get attention," added Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-Brooklyn, Queens). "This is a new low."

From another site.

Any publicity is good publicity.

Do you remember who said that?
I don't agree. She is nuts and I thinks she hates herself and humanity.
I hope she finds empathy and happiness, I really do.

No, I really don't. But what I'm saying is that she pobably believes the saying. And up to a point, the saying is valid. It's hard to know where that point is for some people. I think she has crossed it here, but who's to say the Freepers agree with me? They are her audience.

Pretty sure it was James Brown about the time he was in some trouble... in context it was him making the best of the situation.
I don't agree, coming from someone who used to be in that business... you have to decide at some point to be an artist or celebrity. I guess if you only wish to be the latter it may hold some truth.
In her case, do you want to be a pundit/talking head or celebrity?
What little credibility she once had is on fire.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YyjrhvmDM8&search=Coulter

http://youtube.com/watch?v=nF0pGowq5HM&search=Coulter

http://youtube.com/watch?v=b4f61KVKUKM&search=Coulter

http://youtube.com/watch?v=mD2P3Fk0O3M&search=Coulter

Actually, what I would like to do is this.

Invite Ann Coulter and Fred Phelps to do an interview.
Wait until both of them are in the Green Room.
Lock the door and walk away.

In a news article this morning, Hillary Clinton called Coulter's remarks concerning these women "vicious". I have to agree - which, as far as I know, is a first.

It bothers me that anyone could make the kind of vicious and mean-spirited attacks that Coulter has made. But even more, I fear that there are many folks out there nodding their heads in agreement.

Didn't you hear? If you're not with them, you're against them.

Coulter is a cunt, no ifs ands or buts.

The people nodding in agreement might have a reason.

9-11, Mr A and Mr B head out to work in NYC.

Mr A gets to the WTC but doesn't make it home.
Mr B doesn't make it home either because he was run over by a bus.

Mrs A gets a million or two bucks and the sympathy of the world.
Mrs B get an insurance settlement that will pay off the car but not the mortgage, credit cards, orthodontist or kids tuition.

Mrs A keeps appearing on TV.
Mrs B & kids have now moved in with family and working at the Quicky Mart on the overnight shift.

Maybe Mrs B is nodding. Ya think? :2cents:

And Ann, knowing which way the wind blows, has been reminding everyone of her Christian values.

I think the woman should join the Westboro Baptist Church. She seems to have the kind of Christian values that Rev. Phelps is looking for.

There are a lot of people who have taken control of their lives after misfortune and spoken up about issues. Christopher Reeve, Dana Reeve, Alexandra Scott. Maybe Miss Coulter just thinks that they're 'whiney'.

Normally, I don't wish misfortune on anyone. However, it would be interesting to see how Miss Coulter would handle the situation that the 9/11 widows or any of these three people went through.

God, however, has his own plan and I somehow have the impression that Miss Coulter will become a dried up old conservative in a wool suit smelling like lavender and running something like the Eagle Forum or the Family Research Council.

Misfortune? According to her, it would be the time of her life!

Ann? Ann envy? Are you transferring or .....who is that masked woman?

I see the irony, Bruce. But I don't blame Mrs. A for it. Blame our sick society that makes a carnival out of other people's trauma.

She's the type that gives us (Christians) all a bad name. She shouldn't be spewing out her nonsense babble for fame and then using Christianity as a rhyme for her reason. I'm pretty sure the bible says it is not our job to judge other people. Ann Coulter is annoying, and she loves the attention. The thing is...we keep giving it to her. If everyone ignored her she wouldn't have an auidence that would get her on the best-sellers list.

You really think that she would not find another way to get attention?

Yes but by doing something more socially positive than what she is doing now, for example doing a donkey show on the Capitol steps.

Gonna' have nightmares now... mad at you.

Jimmie Walker and Ann Coulter?

Attachment 59988