The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Technology (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Clean Up or Buy New PC? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=18925)

tw 12-10-2008 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 512415)
I would venture a guess that some, if not a vast majority of people would fix things because they were broken.

If true, then everyone take everything to the shop. The shop always (if economically viable in a free market) solves problems faster, cheaper, and better. Why do we fix things? First to learn. If we only wanted to fix things, then we take everything to the shop.

Why, for example, do I have a grasp of automobile technology or some grasp of a management technique sometimes called quality? How to think - how to zero in on the problem - comes from the training obtained from - for example - fixing a sewing machine when I was 11 or fixing TVs when I was 13.

Posted previously is a concept that so many never grasp. Too many want to fix things immediately - and therefore make things worse. Too many don't learn how to identify the suspect long before trying to fix anything. A lesson I learned, for example, by making that mistake on household electric wiring. First and foremost - we fix things to learn how to think. The concept also called 'learning by doing'.

Why graduate everyone from military academies with engineering knowledge? They need people who know how to think logically - to grasp reality - not someone who knows how to invent fiction. Anybody can invent fiction. Lying (being politically correct - telling someone what they want to hear) comes too naturally to some. But zeroing in on an irrefutible fact is extremely difficult - often best achieved by the few such as Greene of IT&T or Jack Welch of GE.

Learning how to think through a problem is tempered by how reality works ... well we still have Juniper's hot computer problem. Why? Bad temper?

Juniper 12-10-2008 03:28 PM

Oh, okay, fine. Never let it be said that I am not forthcoming with facts. (sigh)

Quote:

Currently installed memory:


256MB
DDR PC3200
512MB
DDR PC3200



Each memory slot can hold DDR PC3200 with a maximum of 1GB per slot.*

# Maximum Memory Capacity: 2048MB
# Currently Installed Memory: 768MB
# Available Memory Slots: 0
# Number of Banks: 2
# Dual Channel Support: No
# CPU Manufacturer: AuthenticAMD
# CPU Family: AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3100+ Model 12, Stepping 0
# CPU Speed: 1800 MHz
Crucial.com says to put in two 1GB memory cards. Bingo.

Juniper 12-10-2008 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 512422)
If true, then everyone take everything to the shop. The shop always (if economically viable in a free market) solves problems faster, cheaper, and better. Why do we fix things? First to learn. If we only wanted to fix things, then we take everything to the shop.

Not true. As I posted elsewhere, I recently got a quote of $117 to fix my daughter's cell phone. I fixed it myself with a $14 part. Most people DIY because it is cheaper. Do I really care about learning how to fix cell phones? Not really, unless it saves me money to fix one again.

dar512 12-10-2008 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 512404)
What did I learn? Best written material required three to five readings. The stuff that is easily read the first time - that results in nothing new the second time - is some of the greatest trash.

Well that's just total BS. I've read some very well written programming books and articles that did not require multiple readings to understand. I, for one, appreciate clear and straightforward prose.

Reread your posts, tw. If you can't hear how pompous they sound, then there's your problem.

tw 12-10-2008 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juniper (Post 512423)
Crucial.com says to put in two 1GB memory cards. Bingo.

Crucial confirms a 256 and and 512 combination is legal? Again, my experience with eMachine. Whereas more responsible computer manufacturers permitted using different size memories, sometimes the 'cost controlled' BIOSes and chipsets only permitted matched memories.

Sometimes is gets worse. Some 'lesser designed' machines would only permit Simms with eight chips on it - not the same size memory Simms that only used two chips.

Every memory has a serial port that describes its hardware to the BIOS. Whereas there may be five almost identical memory Simms of same bit size and configuration, some crappier machines will only permit using one or two of otherwise identical memories. A good memory scanner will know this.

Well, if those numbers are from the crucial scanner (or something equivalent), then it says the 512mb memory is being used as 512; not as 256; and not being completely ignored. It says the BIOS does permit unmatched memory combinations. Task Manager could confirm that Windows agrees.

Moving on - if I read your description correctly of how graphics were loading in IE and Firefox, then this computer has some other problem. Task Manger being a first place to look for that reason for slowness.

Also relevant are error messages in system (event) logs and from Device manager. I don't remember if you posted them before.

Also may be relevant are setting in the BIOS involving wait states and other hardware configuration issues. Best is to first record all relevant values. Then find an option to reset all values to a default settings. Then reboot.

Task Manager still contains some of the most important facts. What processes are consuming maximum CPU time or CPU percentage. As standard in Windows, click on that column to order it, then see what is consuming so much time. Repeat for Memory Delta. What process is consuming too much resources or have become a bottleneck?

Also helpful is to list each topmost processes by exact name. Again, exact names will typically mean nothing to you - and everything to me.

tw 12-10-2008 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dar512 (Post 512429)
Reread your posts, tw. If you can't hear how pompous they sound, then there's your problem.

If you hear anything pompous, then you are entertaining your emotions. I don't care how they sound. I only care what the technical facts are. If you are reading what I am writing, you only see those facts. Pompous is an emotional perception - how you perceive something. If I wanted to be pompous or did not want to sound pompous, then I would worry about being politically correct. I don't. I am only posting facts with complete disregard for something irrelevant - how your emotions react to the sentence structure.

This is a technical discussion. A list of thing to do and to not do – how to solve a technical problem. “You” and “I” have no dog in this fight. “You” and “I” are irrelevant to the subject. If you perceive some hidden meaning in my post, that is you adding what I never stated or even intended.

“It sounds like” is the technical equivalent of wild speculation. Does it specifically state something pompous? Where does that post state a pompous intent? Only way something ‘sounds like’ is if you apply your perceptions – emotions.

I don't care how it sounds. Sounds have nothing to do with technical facts and numbers. A failed computer is the topic here. How to fix it. What is and is not known. What is needed to glean new facts. Pompous has no relevance, is not intended, is (by your own admission) what you perceive.

Worse, you say it 'sounds pompous' without example. In a technical discussion, a fact stated without the underlying whys has no merit. You don't even provide example meaning I can only wildly speculate why you achieved that conclusion. Not that it is relevant. The subject is Juniper's computer; not perceptions due to implied assumptions.

So, where is are your technical facts and objectives that contribute to a solution or the ultimate objective?

Juniper 12-10-2008 04:16 PM

How's this:

http://www.wayswriter.com/pam/tm1.bmp

http://www.wayswriter.com/pam/tm2.bmp

tw 12-10-2008 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juniper (Post 512426)
Not true. As I posted elsewhere, I recently got a quote of $117 to fix my daughter's cell phone. I fixed it myself with a $14 part. Most people DIY because it is cheaper. Do I really care about learning how to fix cell phones?

No. What you learned was more than just about cell phones. Or you learned that by fixing something else. Now what you learned has been expanded to include how cell phones work. Necessary details to prove your point are missing. However, if a shop charged an outrageous $100+ to fix a $14 problem, you have learned there is a problem with cell phone shops, or that cell phone dealer, or ... well you tell me.

So how long did it take to discover that a $14 part was required? You knew immediately? Or did you have to go shopping at your time worth how many dollars per hour? Insufficient facts are provided to confirm or deny your conclusion. Your conclusion does not provide the always necessary supporting details. So your conclusion goes into another box labeled 'unknown and unverified'. I cannot give your claim any credence (or respect or whatever it might be called) because it arrives without the necessary supporting details - the required reasons why.

I periodically fix other's computers for peanuts or nothing. Why? Many times to simply learn that what I knew still applies to current technology. That is the only reason I fix their machines. In a few cases, (due to my mistake) I paid $40 or $80 to correct my mistake. I didn't charge. I learned an expensive lesson - or in one case learned that hardware weakness still exists.

Juniper 12-10-2008 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 512446)
No. What you learned was more than just about cell phones. Or you learned that by fixing something else. Now what you learned has been expanded to include how cell phones work. Necessary details to prove your point are missing. However, if a shop charged an outrageous $100+ to fix a $14 problem, you have learned there is a problem with cell phone shops, or that cell phone dealer, or ... well you tell me.

So how long did it take to discover that a $14 part was required? You knew immediately? Or did you have to go shopping at your time worth how many dollars per hour? Insufficient facts are provided to confirm or deny your conclusion. Your conclusion does not provide the always necessary supporting details. So your conclusion goes into another box labeled 'unknown and unverified'. I cannot give your claim any credence (or respect or whatever it might be called) because it arrives without the necessary supporting details - the required reasons why.

It was fairly obvious that the only problem was the LCD screen, because the phone was otherwise operational. I googled "cell phone repair" and asked for a quote from a shop. Then I figured, well, repair shops have to get their parts somewhere, right? I googled "LCD Screen Sony Ericsson W580i" and found it for $4 on eBay. Ta-da! It's just like replacing a memory card in the computer.

The repair shop - any shop - has to pay its employees. That is why you pay $100 for a repair that just needs a $10 part - the other $90 is labor. Same goes with car repair. I don't know how to put on new brake pads, so I have to pay someone who does, even though those pads might only cost $20. I could learn, if I was so inclined.

Granted the knowledge gained does translate to other areas -- if I learned how to fix the cell phone, or how to find out how to fix the cell phone, by putting memory in my PC through the years, I guess that would go along with your point. But I can't agree with the cause and effect here. I didn't put memory cards in my PC so I would know how to fix other things in the future, like the cell phone. I did it so I could have a faster PC without paying someone else to do it.

tw 12-10-2008 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juniper (Post 512440)
How's this:

Good. That is the information page. According to those numbers, at that time the machine was screaming fast. I still don't see numbers that are most imporant. For example CPU time (not memory usage) should be ordered so that the process consuming most of the CPU is topmost.

Also do same for Mem Delta (not Memory usage).

It looks like McAfee is loaded. Also are somethings called WPwizard, SEPCsuite, and SZserver that I am not familiar with. More important is a list reordered to see what is consuming CPU time AND to see the same list when some task is executing painfully slow. Same also repeated for Memory Deltas.

Another useful statistic may be Page Fault or PF Delta.

Now to learn a useful tool. Click on and then left click on WPwizard. Then end the process tree. This to learn what that process is attached to AND to see what happens when the process is no longer loaded. This same technique can be used on processes that are consuming excessive CPU or Memory Deltas to discover what is or where that process came from. SZServer may refuse to terminate. Not too important. But doing same to processes consuming resource or creating bottlenecks is informative.

A minor point - it appears that 64K is missing from the physical memory. Not significant and not enough to cause a major slowness. Curious; maybe relevant; but currently not significant.

tw 12-10-2008 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juniper (Post 512454)
It was fairly obvious that the only problem was the LCD screen, because the phone was otherwise operational.

LCD screens I had seen had speciality screws or other unique hardware. For example, one scree was a 'three star' equivalent to the standard four star phillips. Did not know LCD screens were that easily replaced or cost so little now. What vintage (year) phone?

Juniper 12-10-2008 05:20 PM

It's new - was purchased this past summer. All it had was a pop clip.

tw 12-10-2008 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juniper (Post 512454)
I didn't put memory cards in my PC so I would know how to fix other things in the future, like the cell phone. I did it so I could have a faster PC without paying someone else to do it.

But now you are walking away with knowledge about how simple memory installation is, concepts such as number of pins, speed, voltage, ... basically the repair shop no longer has a fool to take to the cleaners. Or that knowledge carries over into getting a TV fixed, buying household appliances, etc.- generally becoming a more informed consumer.

Or having learned about upping memory, you now have a better grasp of how much faster a machine becomes - or when it is faster.

Of course, since the memory upgrade went OK, you did not learn even more. We tend to learn more from our destructive mistakes. Either about how easily we do stupid things, or how reliable or consistent we really are. Why did they have everyone climb that rope in gym class? There really are adults who had to be taught how to screw in a screw. They never fixed anything. They never learned by doing. Simply climbing that rope is a lesson that we actually can do more than we had thought.

Juniper 12-11-2008 02:31 AM

I FIGURED IT OUT. I DID IT! WAHOOOO!

1.) slow scrolling problem = video driver issue

My 17" LCD monitor croaked. I replaced it temporarily with a 14" CRT monitor, but at the same time was having other issues with the PC's memory AND the Firefox graphics. So I figured it was a memory problem and went down that road. Turns out I just needed to update my display driver for the new monitor. I have since found an old 17" CRT monitor, so I'm using that instead with an updated driver. Bingo, no more scrolling problems.

And since I ran various diagnostics and got rid of stuff I didn't need, my PC does run faster. Bonus!

2.) Firefox graphics issue -- update "Walnut." I updated Firefox to the latest version but didn't bother updating the "Walnut" add-on, figuring it was just something extra to bog down my already burdened memory. I thought all it did was put a wood-grain frame around the window. Wrong! Suddenly everything is once again displaying as it should.

Good grief, I feel stupid. :)

Flint 12-11-2008 08:03 AM

Is topmost even a word? . . . :hide:

Juniper 12-11-2008 10:15 AM

The Oxford English Dictionary says yes, actually.

Quote:

topmost, a.

Uppermost, highest. Also absol., highest part.

1697 DRYDEN Æneid VII. 99 A swarm of bees..Upon the topmost branch in clouds alight. 1768 TUCKER Lt. Nat. (1834) I. 668 An ambition of..gaining the topmost summit of it. 1807 CRABBE Par. Reg. I. 442 Susan..had some pride Among our topmost people to preside. 1827-35 WILLIS Scholar of Thebet Ben Khorat 228 Wisdom sits alone, Topmost in heaven. 1875 MORRIS Æn. XII. 493 The eager-driven spear Smote on his helm, and shore away the topmost of his crest. 1899 E. J. CHAPMAN Drama of Two Lives 17 The topmost peaks were still aflame With the red sunset's dying glow.

xoxoxoBruce 12-11-2008 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 512446)
snip~ I periodically fix other's computers for peanuts or nothing. Why? Many times to simply learn that what I knew still applies to current technology. That is the only reason I fix their machines. ~snip

I believe you.

lookout123 12-11-2008 10:51 AM

I think he does it to steal their pron.

Pie 12-11-2008 03:11 PM

Way to go, Juni! Want to come over and help me diagnose the very nice / POS vista machine I inherited this summer?

tw 12-12-2008 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pie (Post 512722)
the very nice / POS vista machine

... often called a cash register?

Juniper 12-12-2008 06:43 AM

Um...that's piece of shit, not point of sale.

At least I think so...right? :shrug:

Pie 12-12-2008 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juniper (Post 512890)
Um...that's piece of shit, not point of sale.

Yep. I was trying (somewhat incoherently) to say that the machine itself is pretty nice, but it's running vista, so it blue-screens every 15 minutes or so. I have a lead that it's a driver problem, but I haven't had the time/energy/inclination to chase it down. I just curse it, mutter darkly about Ballmer, and go back to my XP/Ubuntu box.

tw 12-12-2008 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pie (Post 512972)
... , so it blue-screens every 15 minutes or so. I have a lead that it's a driver problem, but I haven't had the time/energy/inclination to chase it down.

Those numbers and statements on the BSOD suggest where the problem is. Some just don't understand them; therefore assume the numbers and words mean nothing. BSOD screen is a useful indication of where a solution lies.

Pie 12-12-2008 01:44 PM

Hey tw, do me a favor and go sod off. I know that. I just haven't bothered.

Spare me your sanctimonious lecture.

Juniper 12-12-2008 02:07 PM

Hey Pie, did you know you can Alt-Tab and get to another window?
Did you know that Ctrl-C copies highlighted text?
Did you know that you can hit Ctrl-Print Screen and do a screen capture?

Just offering some pointers. You know, to help out. :blah:

Shawnee123 12-12-2008 02:09 PM

Did you know the human head weighs eight pounds?

lol

lumberjim 12-12-2008 02:23 PM

pah....on average, maybe. I'm good for a cool dozen, easy

Pie 12-12-2008 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juniper (Post 513099)
Just offering some pointers. You know, to help out. :blah:

:giggle:

fargon 12-12-2008 03:55 PM

We just did a system restore, it only cost me all my pictures and music. And now my machine screams. It is a Compaq Presario I bought at Wal-Mart back in '05, it has Windows XP Home as an O/S and works better than any of the new machines I have seen latly. Vista SUX and needs to be replaced. My next machine will be a Mac.

Flint 12-12-2008 04:00 PM

Don't go that route! Eschew Vista, sure, but go Linux.

Juniper 12-12-2008 04:23 PM

I don't understand why you'd want a machine that screams. Wouldn't all that caterwauling get annoying after a while? I prefer my PC to be nice and quiet. Unless it's playing music or something. Hm.

My laptop runs on Linux. So far so good. It has Open Office which seems to be very nicely compatible with MS Office for file sharing purposes. It's a lot more secure against viruses and other nasties.

Anyway...I just installed that 1GB memory card UT encouraged me to order. Yippee! No more "Memory is low" messages.

Yes, TW, it works just fine alongside my 512MB card. :p

dar512 12-12-2008 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 513147)
Don't go that route! Eschew Vista, sure, but go Linux.

Or BSD. BSD has better documentation than most Linuces (faux plural for Linux).

dar512 12-12-2008 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pie (Post 513089)
Spare me your sanctimonious lecture.

Love it.

Reverend TW. The Polonius of Technology.

busterb 12-12-2008 05:54 PM

Oh-Boy!! What I learned reading this thread. :bolt:

classicman 12-12-2008 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pie (Post 513089)
Hey tw, do me a favor and go sod off. I know that. I just haven't bothered.

Spare me your sanctimonious lecture.

I never thought of you as that selfish Pie. :rolleyes:

Pie 12-12-2008 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 513184)
I never thought of you as that selfish Pie. :rolleyes:

Really, I'm more of a shellfish Pie.

tw 12-13-2008 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juniper (Post 513154)
I don't understand why you'd want a machine that screams.

Its a virtual scream. Does not wake up the neighbors or bring the police.

Juniper 12-13-2008 12:17 PM

http://www.getreligion.org/wp-conten...the_scream.jpg

skysidhe 12-23-2008 11:43 AM

My pc screamed until we took a can of air to its innards.

Undertoad 12-23-2008 02:13 PM

One can is never enough. I use 4.

tw 12-23-2008 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 516166)
One can is never enough. I use 4.

UT is a severe disciplinarian. Gives a whole new meaning to canning a computer.

Clodfobble 12-23-2008 02:48 PM

That's just because he turns the first three upside down and huffs them.

Undertoad 12-23-2008 02:58 PM

They freeze up fast. Man you should have seen the dust cloud generated by the machines in the supermarkets. Supermarkets are a dust factory. We would take the systems out to the dock and make sure we had good wind conditions before blowing them out.

Flint 12-23-2008 03:16 PM

Computers in hospitals, where the linen is always being changed, become full of incredible dust bunnies.
You can't just blow the stuff out, it would be re-absorbed by other equipment! You use a little vacuum.

Pie 12-23-2008 03:46 PM

Vacuums are great Van de Graaff generators...
:shocking:

tw 12-24-2008 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pie (Post 516187)
Vacuums are great Van de Graaff generators...

Do we need any more Van de Graaffs?

Flint 01-01-2009 10:18 PM

Obviously, a special vacuum cleaner designed for cleaning computers. If you just blow the dust out with canned air, it will be re-absorbed either by the exact same computer or another one in the same area.

Reason for posting is that I bought some RAM from crucial.com - thanks for the tip. Used their scan utility, $60 for (2) 1GB sticks. Shipped pretty quick, the only surprise was that it was packed in a bare envelope with no padding, only a clamshell around each stick.

xoxoxoBruce 01-02-2009 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 518233)
Obviously, a special vacuum cleaner designed for cleaning computers. If you just blow the dust out with canned air, it will be re-absorbed either by the exact same computer or another one in the same area.

Oh yes, gotta take it outside to blow it out... plus you'd be breathing that shit too.:yelsick:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.