![]() |
That sucked, guess I'm not bright, got on the second try, about 10 seconds worth of work, and it wasn't even fun, and it sucked.
Why do I keep clicking on crap like this? |
I still don't have it.
All that I can say is that the number of petals is (as far as I've seen) always even. |
grrrrrraaaaaaarrrrrrggghhhhhh
-sm |
it has taken me 20 min so far, but I stopped playing because of Internet costs. Best guess, It would take me about 1-2 years because, well, my IQ is 136 ( how is it that a circumstance like this makes you feel ashamed of how smart are you:mad: )
|
ok, let me say that i don't believe the "smarter" you are the longer it takes, because the people i see finishing quickly (although i may disagree with them at times) are definitely not ranking low on the intellectual scale. for all of you that in the past have thought i was the world's biggest dumbass - point proven.
i've been going for 45 minutes and i am so f'ing pissed right now. i have never felt more stupid in my entire life. would someone please take pity on me and email me big picture that i am obviously missing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
This still pisses me off...I punched in 2 and clicked, then figured it out......I'm probably the dumbest of the regulars here, and it wasn't fun, wasn't stimulating, the smarter you are crap is crap, and I came back to this thread...that's what really bunches my undies.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ow, my feelings. |
If anyone really wants he answer I'll PM it to them; I do have to agree, it's nothing to do with how smart you are, just your abiliaty to think laterally - something which in itself is a sign of intelligence and creativity. As I said before, being a coder or any job where similar types of thinkig are needed is a massive disadvantage.
If you can't solve it, do this. Stand back, repeat the name out loud to yourself a few times, click roll, get the answer and think for a few minutes... Think about the name. |
Quote:
|
Just shut up before you know who starts a vote for the dumbest thread.:rolleyes:
|
Finally got it, one day later.
What's really bad is that that was the first solution that came to mind, however I took the language of the question too literally. After dismissing my original hypothesis, I went scatter brained and attacked the problem, looking for all sorts of things. I noticed one attribute that kept popping up, but I didn't stop to think out the logical ramifications of that until I left the problem and came back to it. I'm just glad that "rose" isn't a homonym for "rows". |
I guess I'm not a lateral thinker....I got the answer right on the second try but it was pure luck because I don't know what the HELL I'm looking at.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.