![]() |
I think people ought to be able to believe what they wish, and be respected by others in the process.
If I gave offense at my take on TPOTC, I apologize. I'm sure that, for the Believer, it must be an awful experience to see the gospels represented in such literal and graphic fashion. |
Quote:
|
I humbly accept this nomination on the grounds that I thought it was one of the most tasteless, yet hysterical, jokes I'd ever heard.
|
I've always liked the one where Jesus keeps calling to John from the cross, and John keeps trying to reach him but is repeatedly beaten by the guards, etc.; finally, John manages to get close to Jesus, and just before the guards drag him away for a final beating, John says, "Yes, Lord?" and Jesus says, "John...I can see my house from up here!"
Btw, I've heard that the Devil in 'PofC' is scary, but I'll bet he/she isn't scarier than Viggo Mortensen in 'The Prophecy'. As The Comic Book Guy might say, "Best Satan ever!" |
I was discussing it with a friend of mine, and I threw out the following idea that seemed to sum up the film pretty well.
The Passion is like a magnification mirror - you take out what you went in with, enhanced by ten. If you had anti-Semitic feelings inside going in, they were on the outside coming out. Same for people alert for - the uncharitable would say "paranoid of" - hints of anti-Semitism. So on and so forth. |
What I loved was that there was all these people protesting the movie before they saw it. I saw it in Teaneck, NJ, a town with a very large Jewish population. People were saying, "Oh, it makes us Jews out to be the evil ones!" I said "Did you see the movie?" "Well, no, but we know without seeing it!" It's amazing that these poeple were that stupid, considering that one of them was a rabbi. Yes, some of the high priests were in on the killing, but several were stongly opposed to it. They were promptly ignored. However, the make-up effects were outstandinig, and the camerawork was able to intensify scenes.
Ever notice on some statues of the Christ, there's a sign above his head that reads "INRI"? That means "I'm Nailed Right In". |
Quote:
Not sure if I even want to see the film, but I thought the reactions were quite interesting. |
I went and saw it with my very Christian husband last weekend and both of us were crying.
It was graphic, it was a difficult thing to watch, but it was also exactly what it was supposed be: one man's vision of an event. Most Fundies are seriously pissed that he drew so much from Anne Emmerich's writings. Mel didn't try to say he didn't. Anything not directly from the bible was directly from Emmerich's writings. Mel is unabashedly Catholic, and so is the movie. IF YOU KNOW WHAT TO LOOK FOR. For me, I don't know anything about the "stations of the cross" so I didn't recognize it when I saw it. Just like any other movie, it's all in what you're looking for. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I dont really think I want to watch this film. ...I find it hard to suspend disbelief as soon as it involves events I was taught by my teachers to view as history and then discovered were actually up for interpretation.....
I find any movie that takes as it's base an assumed existence of God or an assumption of historical accuracy on events that are unproved difficult to get into. Not just the serious stuff. I found that Jim Carey film fell flat for me for the same reason. ....Just the way I am. I dont mind films where the characters hold a religious belief, I can empathise with them and their belief...I just find it hard to get into a film which needs the audience to assume an existence of God or the truth of those events for the plot to work. I am intrigued though to know how you guys got along withthe Aramaic? Did it work? Did it heighten the sense of immersion in a time and place? |
Well, DanaC, I feel that the Aramaic and Latin helped the movie. If it had been done in English, I don't think it would have worked too well. (Remember "Robin Hood" with Kevin Costner? Robin with a California accent? "Dude, he swiped yer girl! What a bummer!") TPOTC uses subtitles, but they're onscreen long enough to read them and not lose track of the movie.
|
I really think it would not have worked any other way. I thought the subtitles would be distracting, but they weren't.
|
Quote:
|
That's true of "Johnny Tremain" as well.
And I suspect you have linked the wrong AIG. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.