debate is fine, scrunchy. But you came on here and made disparaging remarks right out of the gate without letting anyone get to know you first. Perhaps you lurked for a while and have formed some opinions about some of us, but you need to understand that to us, you're a stranger. When a stranger comes at you, and you have no way of knowing whether or not they're being sarcastic, serious, or just plain rude, you tend to fire back twice as hard as you would to a familiar person.. First impressions matter, and so far it seems to me that you come looking for a fight.

I beg to differ lumber. I have lurked here for a while, and interpretted the board as head on debate.
My first post was to the France did something right for once! thread, and in it I replied to onyncougar
I usually use a uk site called ukshout.com and on that site, the above reply would be acceptable. However the response here was a torrent of personal abuse, and I quote

Now you tell me who was the one who was personally abusive?

It seems to me that some like to dish out the insults, but whine when they get them in return.

People like onyxcougar cant take an alternative viewpoint , they can only spew bile. Although this doesnt surprise me, most of his ilk can only hideaway on one sided sites. I've seen it on ukshout, they kick their ball off the park and storm off in a in a volley of insults.

Onyx you stay hiding on your little protected site, but dont expect me to fuck off, I've got balls unlike you, you eunuch.

:finger:

You pointed your criticism directly at her in your response to her comment about the French. You lose.

I'd back OJ Simpson before I backed Dubya. I was just pointing out the fact that even his writers can't come up with anything original. Republicant's often steal from those who are truly libertarian so they can hide the fact that they are fascists.

Yeah, well, perhaps cougar was a tad escalative in her reply, but when your argument begins with "yawn." you imply that you've heard this before and the person you're yawing at has nothing to offer, thereby invalidating their opinion. rude at best.

Regardless, I was actually referring to your calling me "nazi boy" over a wisecrack i made about the palestine situation. I was not offended, make no mistake. If you had known who you were talking to ( and if youve lurked for even a week, you've seen something i've written) you'd know that i am nothing of the sort.

I enjoy a nice flamefest as much as the next guy, and if you'd like to trade insults, I even created an insult thread that we could duke it out in if you feel froggy. My point is that if you care to fit in or have your pov taken seriously at all, you may want to get to know us and let us get to know you before you throw the first stone.

and if youve lurked for even a week, you've seen something i've written

Ahem... a whole week? ;)

Ditto fuckwad.

Insignificant? LOL well you're talking to me......what does that make you?



You're on? LOL you are fucking moronic, when did I ever tell you you were on that board?

You wouldnt last there two minutes, as previously stated people like yourself hide away with your own ilk.

And you wont find me trolling there, as those fuckwads like yourself run from there. As soon as your fuckwad compatriots left I decided to wander off too and find their like elsewhere.

Now off you go and lie on your back like a good little mattress, that's a certain way to get the attention you clearly crave.

ok, an hour

Scrunchy appears not to have read Dale Carnegie lately.

Scrunchy

fitting name ,
it's the sound all that sand in his vigina makes .:rolleyes:

Onyx if you have nothing to add to the debate, except your frustrated whining please leave, no one is forcing you to read it.

Now do the rest of you agree with Shrub that there is no neutral ground between good and evil, freedom and slavery, and life and death.

Isnt this a rather simplistic viewpoint, or do you agree with Shrub's assessment?

Somebody wrote a line in a speech that he read. Get over it.

Sure there's a middle ground: indifference.