![]() |
Quote:
and the band-aid of the guy who doesn't have insurance... and part of the cost for the band-aid of the person who is covered by medicare or medicaid. :/ |
"We might just see how many would survive in the "free market"."
Of course, Lamp, you understand you're confusing 'free market' (unrestrained, unrestricted, transactions between, among, of, individuals) with 'capitalism' (the free market's stunted, retarded, drooling, shitting itself, lil brother, the one that mates with its sister, socialism, spawning even more horrific monsters in the manner of Lilith)...you 'do' get the difference between the two, yes?
Probably not...*shrug* |
Quote:
Also, pay less tax then there's no tax return for them to take. Aim for a $0 tax return. Why are you giving the government a free loan? Especially if you don't support its policies? As long as you don't end up owing tax you're good. |
A little biased perhaps, but made me smile (not saying this is you, philthy)
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net...19415750_n.jpg |
Quote:
We must decide whether we want socialized medicine (ie UK's National Health Service) or a working free market medicine (ie Affordable Health Care currently being implemented). Otherwise the best solution is to let people die in the streets if they cannot pay. The current system is why a box of Kleenex must cost maybe $125. Due to a perverted and disfuctional system, openly advocated by many with a poltical agenda. Medical services must charge excessively so that the few pay for all others. And to pay for a bloated bureacracy necessary to make cost redirection work. This is the system that extremists want to protect. Medicine is not a charity. It is a business. A service just like any other business whose purpose is the advancement of mankind. Even non-profits must balance the books. |
Quote:
|
Medicare for all!!!!
|
Quote:
|
your phrasing, "we need to X or Y. otherwise, Z." seems to me to imply just those two options... Sorry if I assumed too much?
|
Quote:
No way around it. Either a hospital knows it will be paid. Or can refuse service. 'Refuse service' is only 'not an option' when one is entertaining emotions. Refusing service is a viable option considered when one is actually confronting the problem That option should be default should we choose to ignore the problem. No other business would offer services that cannot be paid for. Nor should any business be expected to. Especially when all other options are viable and proven. That means I stated no preference for any. I even think leaving people to die on the street is a viable option. Because it solves the problem. |
Quote:
as far as aiming for a zero tax return, yeah, i see that approach. i like it actually, however having dealt with the IRS in the past, it's better to feed the mafia and get a return than to wind up owing it. ETA - good comic monie, loved it! |
Quote:
i'm kidding!!!!!! seriously, now i know we've had our differences before and i want to keep this as civil as possible. if you, for example, had a great job but now you're either unemployed or underemployed and you get sick -no insurance anymore - and could die from your ailment .....you're basically saying put me out in the street for "bring out your dead" instead of help me? nah man, i get what you mean, a darwinism effect if you will, but dude, really. humane. i remind you of the hippocratic oath: Quote:
|
I think tw is being hyperbolic to satirize conservatives who really DO believe that if you get sick and can't pay for it you SHOULD just die.
edit: i take that back. I hope that. I have no idea what sort of android or savant or whatever tw is... i can NEVER tell when he's being facetious or if he even ever is. |
Quote:
but have special supports and advantages that other forms of business do not have. Medicine, and especially hospitals, survive in part, on the charity of the public. As such, they have advantages because certain things (obligations) are expected of them. What other free-market, service-business gets tax-free properties, donations from the public, support by religious organizations, volunteers, governmental reimbursement at rates that vary by location, grants to employees for working in relatively isolated communities, county- or volunteer-provided supplemental assistance such as ambulance services, etc. And in some communities are allowed monopolistic business practices. Likewise, there is state-support Schools of Medicine and Nursing to train hospital employees that cause the tax payers far more than what the tuition and student loans. TW, As you said in another post, "I never said...." I too never said anything like "no hospital has gone bankrupt". Of course some have, and physicians and hospital staff have been fired. I too can give a specific examples of a hospital that fired it's entire janitorial staff so aides and voluteers would do that work, and in the same month increased the CEO's salary by $100,000. I agree with you that Medicine is not a charity, but it can not be a free-market business either. Of course, they have to balance their books. But if when a hospital is in the red at the end of the fiscal year, they can have a campaign asking for public donations to balance their books. And, they can go to state and federal agencies asking for "emergency funds" How many truly free-market businesses can compete on such unequal playing fields ? As said before, hospitals have a special place in society, and as such, have some special (non-emotional) expectations and obligations to serve the public. ETA: I forgot to mention "training hospitals" Some hospitals get special compensations from governments by providing "training" to medical personnel. As such, they are often (very often) getting high-trained employees for below-market salaries. |
Quote:
Does not matter if the building is tax free. It is still a business. It must pay its bills. It must pay its employees. Or it must cease to exist even if desperately needed. Why are so many churches closing? As with any business, even if needed. It must cease to exist if the bills are not paid. Without a system where customers can pay, then a hospital should be expected to refuse service. Otherwise medicine gets denied to so many more. Free market is the American way in any and every business. But to not fix the system only perverts a free market. Customers did not die because hospitals are evil. They died because we did not fix what is obviously a worst system in the world. Adversarial politicians caused those deaths by wanting bad economics and a political agenda. Americans pay double what anyone else in the world pays because we think it is fair to seek medical services without paying. Foolishly think charity is a permanent solution. How to guarantee no medical services? Americans are somewhere down between 25 and 50 on the list of successful medicine. American medicine is that poor. Costs twice as much as any other nation. Deaths directly traceable to economic mismanagement. Facetious is that reality if it also was not so sad. If we do not have a workable solution, then the most honest and decent people have no other option. Deny service to anyone who cannot pay. That is free markets gone bad because so many leaders would exercise a political agenda rather than address a problem. People are already dying because bills cannot be paid. If our system cannot guarantee payment, then the Hypocratic oath is violated. Nothing works if the bills are not paid. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.